skills/sales-compete/SKILL.md
Runs competitive displacement campaigns — find competitor customers, identify those ready to switch, and build targeted outreach with displacement-specific messaging. Use when you know prospects are using a competitor and want to win them over, need to find companies likely to switch, losing deals to a specific competitor, or displacement outreach isn't landing. Do NOT use for general prospect list building (use /sales-prospect-list) or general outreach writing (use /sales-cadence).
npx skillsauth add sales-skills/sales sales-competeInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Help the user find competitor customers, identify those ready to switch, and build targeted outreach with displacement-specific messaging. This skill is platform-agnostic but references Apollo.io's technographic and intent data as the primary source. The same frameworks apply to ZoomInfo, G2, BuiltWith, HG Insights, or any technographic/intent provider.
If references/learnings.md exists, read it first for accumulated knowledge.
Ask the user:
Which competitor are you targeting?
What do you sell, and what's the primary displacement angle?
What data sources do you have access to?
What's your ICP? (Overlay on top of the competitor's installed base — not every competitor customer is a good fit for you)
If the user's request already provides most of this context, skip directly to the relevant step. Lead with your best-effort answer using reasonable assumptions (stated explicitly), then ask only the most critical 1-2 clarifying questions at the end — don't gate your response behind gathering complete context.
Use technographic filters to find companies using the competitor's product:
Don't target the entire installed base — narrow to your ICP:
| Data source | Accuracy | Lag | Best for | |---|---|---|---| | Apollo technographic | 70-80% | 3-6 months | Broad installed base discovery | | BuiltWith/HG Insights | 80-90% | 1-3 months | Web/SaaS technology detection | | G2 visitor data | High intent signal | Real-time | Active evaluators | | CRM win/loss data | 100% (your data) | Current | Known competitive encounters |
Platform-specific detail (e.g. LeadMagic's ad-intelligence + technographics endpoints) lives in references/platforms.md — read it when the user names a specific tool.
Layer signals on top of the installed base to identify companies ready to switch:
| Signal | Source | Readiness level | What it means | |---|---|---|---| | Researching alternatives | Intent data (Apollo/Bombora), G2 comparison views | Very high | Actively evaluating — act fast | | New leader hired | Job change alerts (Apollo, LinkedIn) | High | New VP/CTO in first 90 days = re-evaluation window | | Contract renewal timing | Industry knowledge, sales intel | High | 60-90 days before renewal is the sweet spot | | Hiring for roles your product replaces | Job postings (Apollo, LinkedIn) | Medium-high | Building capacity = potential dissatisfaction with current tool | | Competitor mentioned in negative context | G2 reviews, Reddit, social | Medium | Public dissatisfaction, but may not be actively looking | | Funding event | Apollo, Crunchbase | Medium | New budget to re-evaluate stack | | Technographic change | Apollo, BuiltWith | Medium | Removing adjacent tools may signal broader stack re-evaluation |
Multiple signals compound readiness. Score each prospect:
| Signals present | Priority | Action | |---|---|---| | 3+ signals (e.g., new CTO + researching alternatives + contract renewal) | Immediate | Direct outreach, top of queue | | 2 signals (e.g., new leader + hiring) | High | Prioritized outreach within 1-2 weeks | | 1 strong signal (researching alternatives) | Medium-high | Standard outreach cadence | | 1 weak signal (funding, tech change) | Medium | Add to nurture, monitor for additional signals | | ICP fit only, no signals | Low | Long-term nurture, not active outreach |
| Tier | Criteria | Volume target | Outreach approach | |---|---|---|---| | Tier 1 — Active | ICP fit + 2+ displacement signals | 10-15% of base | Hyper-personalized, multi-channel, reference specific signals | | Tier 2 — Primed | ICP fit + 1 signal or very strong fit | 25-35% of base | Personalized at segment level, competitor-aware messaging | | Tier 3 — Latent | ICP fit, no active signal | 50-60% of base | Nurture content, thought leadership, not direct displacement pitch |
For each Tier 1 prospect, identify the specific displacement angle:
| Prospect situation | Messaging angle | |---|---| | New leader (first 90 days) | "As you evaluate your stack..." — frame as helping them succeed in their new role | | Researching alternatives | "I noticed companies like yours are evaluating [category]..." — don't reveal your data source | | Hiring for roles your product addresses | "I see you're scaling [function]..." — position as enabling growth, not replacing tools | | Negative competitor reviews | "Many [competitor] customers tell us..." — reference common pain points, not specific reviews | | Contract renewal approaching | "Before you renew..." — create urgency around the renewal window |
For the outreach team, create a quick-reference battle card:
Design signal-specific outreach strategies:
/sales-cadence for detailed design/sales-cadence/sales-cadenceThis skill covers a strategy domain across many platforms. Before pointing the user to any specific platform skill (any /sales-{platform} listed in ### Related skills, e.g., /sales-leadmagic), read that platform skill's actual SKILL.md first. The 1-line description in ### Related skills is enough to identify a candidate — it's not enough to commit to it or to write a prompt that invokes it well.
How to read it:
~/.claude/skills/{skill-name}/SKILL.md exists locally, Read it.sales-* skills, WebFetch directly from this repo: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/sales-skills/sales/main/skills/{skill-name}/SKILL.md — e.g., for sales-mailshake: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/sales-skills/sales/main/skills/sales-mailshake/SKILL.md.sales-* skills (third-party), look up {org}/{repo} in ~/.claude/skills/sales-do/references/skill-sources.md if installed and fetch the same skills/{skill-name}/SKILL.md path under that repo.After reading, ground your recommendation in something concrete from the SKILL.md (its scope, a sub-flow, its argument-hint shape, or a "Do NOT use for..." negative trigger). Align any generated invocation with the platform skill's argument-hint. If the platform skill turns out not to fit the user's situation, swap to another or handle the question here directly rather than recommending a poor fit.
/sales-prospect-list — Build general prospect lists (non-competitive)/sales-cadence — Design the multi-channel sequence for displacement outreach/sales-intent — Interpret buying signals beyond competitive displacement/sales-leadmagic — LeadMagic competitive ad intelligence, technographics, and company enrichment/sales-do — Not sure which skill to use? The router matches any sales objective to the right skill. Install: npx skills add sales-skills/sales --skill sales-doDon't trash-talk the competitor in outreach. Lead with your value, not their flaws. Negative selling triggers defensiveness — especially if the prospect chose the competitor and feels personally attached to the decision.
Don't assume technographic data is real-time. Tech installs in Apollo and similar tools can be 3-6 months stale. A company may have already switched away from the competitor, or the install may be a free tier/trial they never actually use. Always validate with additional signals.
Don't target the entire installed base. Most competitor users are happy — or at least not unhappy enough to switch. Blasting 10,000 competitor customers with "switch to us" messages wastes effort and damages your brand. Focus on those with displacement signals.
Don't forget switching costs. The prospect isn't just evaluating your product vs. the competitor — they're evaluating your product vs. the competitor PLUS the pain of migrating. Address migration support, onboarding help, and data transfer upfront or the prospect won't engage.
Self-improving: If you discover something not covered here, append it to references/learnings.md with today's date.
User says: "Help me take customers away from Datadog" Skill does:
User says: "I know 50 companies use [competitor]. Which ones should I target first?" Skill does:
User says: "A competitor's customer just hired a new CTO. How do I approach?" Skill does:
Cause: Competitor's technology isn't well-tracked in your data provider, or they use a private/custom deployment Solution: Try multiple data sources (Apollo + BuiltWith + G2). Use competitor name in intent topics as an alternative signal. Check CRM win/loss data for known competitive encounters.
Cause: Messaging is too aggressive ("switch from X") or too generic (doesn't address the prospect's specific situation) Solution: Revisit messaging angles — lead with the prospect's pain, not your product. Test whether softening the competitive angle improves response rates. Consider whether the intent signal was false positive.
Cause: They may genuinely be happy, or they're brushing you off because the pitch wasn't relevant Solution: Shift from displacement to education — share thought leadership that makes them question whether "happy" means "optimal," then address the loyalty objection specifically.
tools
Wizlogo (wizlogo.com) platform help — a budget online logo maker (template/style-variation, marketed as "AI") plus a hub of FREE branding tools (business-name, blog-name and slogan generators, business-card maker, invoice generator, color converter, domain search). The pricing traps: the FREE logo is PERSONAL-USE-ONLY; the two cheap paid tiers are RASTER PNG/JPG only — Single (~€39.99 one-time) and Unlimited (~€3.99 per WEEK, recurring) — and VECTOR (SVG/PDF/EPS) is gated to the ~€299.99 Enterprise tier, which also bundles human designer edits and a social kit. Transparent PNG is on all paid plans. Use when making a Wizlogo logo, understanding free-vs-paid or personal-vs-commercial use, which tier unlocks vector/SVG for print, the weekly-subscription billing trap, its free name/slogan generators, or whether it has an API (UI-only — no public API, webhooks, Zapier or MCP). Do NOT use to just generate the business name (use /sales-namelix) or to compare/validate branding tools (use /sales-idea-validation).
tools
VistaPrint platform help (vistaprint.com, a Cimpress company) — the small-business design + print + digital-marketing platform: a free AI Logomaker (4 generations, 60 more after free sign-up) exporting SVG/PNG/PDF at 4000x4000 with no watermark, a free Brand Kit, business cards/flyers/signage/apparel/promo print, and a website builder. THE RIGHTS TRAP: VistaPrint states NO intellectual-property rights transfer on an AI-generated logo — you get usage rights but CANNOT register it for trademark or copyright; only its human designer service transfers full IP. Use when making a VistaPrint logo, asking if you own or can trademark it, running out of AI logo credits, printed colors not matching the screen, bleed/DPI/font file-prep rejections, or asking whether VistaPrint has an API (the consumer site does not — automation runs through the parent Cimpress Open partner-fulfilment API). Do NOT use for Vista Social scheduling (use /sales-vistasocial) or comparing logo tools market-wide (use /sales-idea-validation).
tools
Turbologo (turbologo.com) platform help — a budget AI/DIY logo maker: enter a business name + industry, pick icons and colors, and it proposes logo concepts you refine in an in-browser editor, then pay a one-time fee to download (designing is free, previews are watermarked, downloading is the paywall). Vector SVG/PDF is gated to the mid tier and up; the top tier adds a brand kit (business cards, letterheads, email signatures, social assets). Use when generating a logo in Turbologo, choosing which download tier to buy, vector SVG vs raster PNG, removing the free watermark, the time-limited edit-after-purchase window, pay-to-download pricing questions, whether an AI logo is yours to trademark, or whether Turbologo has an API to bulk-generate logos (it is UI-only — no public API, webhooks, Zapier, or MCP). Do NOT use to generate the business name (use /sales-namelix), compare or validate branding tools across the market (use /sales-idea-validation), or build wider marketing creative (use /sales-canva).
tools
Online Logo Maker (onlinelogomaker.com) platform help — a long-standing free/freemium DIY logo maker: build the mark yourself from icons, shapes, text, and fonts — MANUAL/template-based, NOT enter-a-name-get-AI-concepts. The free pack downloads a LOW-RES 300px PNG with a background; vector SVG, transparent PNG, and 2000px high-res are gated to a one-time lifetime Premium pack (not a subscription). The free tier's commercial-use rights are disputed by reviewers — clean ownership effectively needs Premium, and a shared-icon mark can be non-distinctive. Use for building/editing a logo here, free download vs Premium, vector SVG or transparent PNG, one-time pricing, commercial-use/trademark terms, near-namesake confusion (NOT LogoMaker.com / LogoMakr / Logomakerr.ai), or whether it has an API (UI-only — no API, webhooks, Zapier, MCP). Do NOT use to generate the business name (use /sales-namelix), compare branding tools across the market (use /sales-idea-validation), or build wider creative (use /sales-canva).