sales-skills/sales-call-review
skills/sales-call-review/SKILL.md
Reviews sales calls, extract coaching insights, and score against MEDDPICC/SPIN/Challenger. Use when a rep lost a deal and you want to understand why, call went sideways and need to debrief, not sure if rep is qualifying properly, need to pull action items from a recorded call, rep talking too much and not listening, or need to give structured feedback on a call. Do NOT use for prepping discovery questions (use /sales-discovery), general objection handling strategy (use /sales-objection), or deal-level risk analysis (use /sales-deal-inspect).
$ install --global
skillsauthnpx skillsauth add sales-skills/sales sales-call-reviewInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
Security Scan Results
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
3
Scanners Passed
9
Scanners in report
Clean
TrivyContainer and dependency vulnerability scanner
95%
Clean
SemgrepStatic code analysis for vulnerabilities
95%
Clean
mcp-scan (Snyk)Model Context Protocol security validation
95%
Skipped
Snyk (dep)Open source security scanning
50%
Skipped
Socket.devSupply chain security analysis
50%
Skipped
VirusTotalMulti-engine malware detection
50%
Skipped
CrowdStrikeAdvanced threat intelligence
50%
Skipped
OSV-ScannerOpen Source Vulnerability database check
50%
Skipped
OWASP Dep-Check
50%
Last scanned: Apr 25, 2026, 2:11 AM128.2s3 files scanned
SKILL.md
- name:
- sales-call-review
- description:
- Reviews sales calls, extract coaching insights, and score against MEDDPICC/SPIN/Challenger. Use when a rep lost a deal and you want to understand why, call went sideways and need to debrief, not sure if rep is qualifying properly, need to pull action items from a recorded call, rep talking too much and not listening, or need to give structured feedback on a call. Do NOT use for prepping discovery questions (use /sales-discovery), general objection handling strategy (use /sales-objection), or deal-level risk analysis (use /sales-deal-inspect).
- argument-hint:
- [paste transcript or describe the call — type, participants, outcome]
- license:
- MIT
- version:
- 1.0.0
- tags:
- [sales, coaching, call-recording, conversation-intelligence]
Review a Sales Call
Help the user review a sales call — score it against best practices, identify key moments, extract coaching insights, and plan follow-up actions.
Step 1 — Gather context
If references/learnings.md exists, read it first for accumulated knowledge.
Ask the user:
-
What type of call was this?
- A) Discovery / qualification call
- B) Demo / product presentation
- C) Negotiation / pricing discussion
- D) Follow-up / check-in
- E) Executive briefing
- F) Technical deep-dive
- G) Closing call
- H) Other — describe it
-
What feedback are you focused on?
- A) Overall call quality and coaching points
- B) Specific methodology scoring (MEDDPICC, SPIN, Challenger)
- C) Talk-to-listen ratio and engagement patterns
- D) Objection handling moments
- E) Next steps and commitment quality
- F) All of the above
-
Do you have a transcript or recording?
- A) Yes — I'll paste the transcript
- B) Yes — I'll describe what happened
- C) No — I want a general call review framework to use
- D) I have Salesloft Conversations data (scores, topics, etc.)
-
Who is providing/receiving feedback?
- A) Manager reviewing a rep's call
- B) Rep self-reviewing their own call
- C) Peer review / team coaching session
- D) Preparing feedback for a 1:1
If the user's request already provides most of this context, skip directly to the relevant step. Lead with your best-effort answer using reasonable assumptions (stated explicitly), then ask only the most critical 1-2 clarifying questions at the end — don't gate your response behind gathering complete context.
Step 2 — Call scorecard
Use this scorecard as a framework — adapt the dimensions based on call type and what the user asked to focus on. Not every dimension applies to every call (e.g., objection handling may not come up in a first discovery call).
| Dimension | Score (1-5) | Evidence | Coaching note | |-----------|-------------|----------|---------------| | Opening & rapport | | Did they earn the right to continue in the first 30 seconds? | | | Discovery depth | | Did they uncover real pain, impact, and urgency? Or stayed surface-level? | | | Active listening | | Did they paraphrase, ask follow-ups, and build on what the prospect said? | | | Value articulation | | Did they connect capabilities to the prospect's specific situation? | | | Objection handling | | Did they acknowledge, clarify, and address objections effectively? | | | Next steps | | Did they secure a specific, time-bound commitment? | | | Talk-to-listen ratio | | Target: 40-60% talk for discovery, 60-70% for demos | | | Longest monologue | | Target: under 2 minutes. Long monologues lose prospects. | | | Filler words | | Excessive "um", "like", "you know", "basically" erode credibility | |
Overall score: Average of all dimensions → Rating:
- 4.5-5.0: Exceptional — use as a coaching example
- 3.5-4.4: Strong — one or two areas to sharpen
- 2.5-3.4: Developing — clear coaching priorities
- 1.0-2.4: Needs significant improvement — focus on fundamentals
Methodology-specific scoring layers
MEDDPICC layer (if applicable): | Element | Addressed? | What was uncovered | What's still missing | |---------|-----------|-------------------|---------------------| | Metrics | | | | | Economic Buyer | | | | | Decision Criteria | | | | | Decision Process | | | | | Paper Process | | | | | Implicate the Pain | | | | | Champion | | | | | Competition | | | |
SPIN layer (if applicable): | Question Type | Count | Quality (1-5) | Best example | |--------------|-------|---------------|-------------| | Situation | | | | | Problem | | | | | Implication | | | | | Need-Payoff | | | |
Challenger layer (if applicable):
- Did they teach something the prospect didn't know? (Teach)
- Did they tailor the message to this specific stakeholder? (Tailor)
- Did they maintain control of the conversation and process? (Take Control)
Step 3 — Key moments analysis
Identify and analyze the most important moments:
Best moment
What was the single best thing the rep did on this call? Quote it if possible and explain why it worked.
Missed opportunity
What was the biggest moment they could have capitalized on but didn't? What should they have said or done instead?
Objection moments
For each objection that came up: | Objection | How it was handled | Better approach | Rating (1-5) | |-----------|-------------------|-----------------|---------------|
Buying signals
List any positive signals the prospect gave (verbal or behavioral):
- Asking about implementation timeline
- Mentioning other stakeholders who should see this
- Asking about pricing/packaging
- Describing their current process in detail (shows trust)
Risk signals
List any warning signs:
- Vague commitment to next steps
- "We'll get back to you" without a specific date
- Avoiding budget/authority questions
- Comparing to a competitor without being asked
Step 4 — Coaching recommendations
Provide 3-5 specific, actionable coaching recommendations:
For each recommendation:
- What to improve: Specific skill or behavior
- Why it matters: Impact on deal outcomes
- How to practice: Concrete drill or exercise
- Example: What "great" sounds like for this specific situation
Practice drills
- Discovery depth drill: Take a surface-level answer and practice asking 3 layers deeper. "You mentioned X. Help me understand — what's the impact of that on [metric]? If that continues for another quarter, what happens?"
- Monologue breaker drill: Practice delivering any point in under 60 seconds, then asking a question. Set a timer.
- Objection sparring: Role-play the top 3 objections from this call. Practice acknowledge → clarify → respond → check.
- Next steps drill: Practice ending every conversation with "Based on what we discussed, the logical next step is [specific]. Does [specific date/time] work for you to [specific action]?"
Step 5 — Follow-up action items
Extract concrete action items from the call:
Commitments made
List everything both sides committed to doing, with owners and deadlines.
Unanswered questions
List questions the prospect asked that weren't fully answered, plus questions the rep should have asked but didn't.
Stakeholders to engage
Who was mentioned on the call that needs to be brought into the process? What's the plan to reach them?
Draft follow-up email
Write a follow-up email the rep can send within 24 hours:
- Recap what was discussed (in the prospect's language, not yours)
- Confirm next steps and dates
- Attach anything promised
- Add one piece of value not discussed on the call
- Keep it under 200 words
Next call agenda
If a follow-up call was booked, draft a proposed agenda:
- Recap and confirm any changes since last call
- [Topic based on what was left unresolved]
- [New topic to advance the deal]
- Confirm next steps and timeline
For platform-specific call review guidance (Revenue.io, Seismic, ZoomInfo Chorus, Outdoo, Jiminny, Enthu.AI, NICE CXone, Sybill, Balto, Weflow), see references/platforms.md.
Related skills
/sales-sybill— Sybill platform help (CRM Autofill, Deal Workspace, Ask Sybill, Magic Summaries)/sales-jiminny— Jiminny platform help (coaching-focused conversation intelligence, revenue intelligence, 8 CRM integrations)/sales-gong— Gong platform help (Smart Trackers, coaching scorecards, deal boards, transcript API)/sales-note-taker— Picking an AI note-taker (Fathom, Fireflies, Avoma, Gong, etc.) or wiring its API into CRM/warehouse for transcripts and summaries/sales-salesloft— Salesloft Conversations settings, coaching playlists, recording configuration/sales-discovery— Prep for the next discovery call with better questions/sales-deal-inspect— Assess overall deal health beyond just the call/sales-objection— Deep-dive on objection handling strategies/sales-cadence— Optimize outbound cadences based on call learnings/sales-seismic— Seismic platform help including Meeting Intelligence and content management/sales-zoominfo— ZoomInfo platform help (Chorus conversation intelligence, Momentum deal insights)/sales-salesask— Sales Ask platform help (field + call center AI coaching, Coach Dean active feedback, home services vertical)/sales-outdoo— Outdoo platform help (AI roleplay coaching, conversation intelligence, revenue intelligence, CRM automation, mid-market Gong alternative)/sales-enthu— Enthu.AI platform help (contact center QA with auto-scoring, agent coaching, compliance monitoring, affordable Gong alternative)/sales-revenue-io— Revenue.io platform help (Salesforce-native conversation intelligence, AI scoring with 400+ criteria, Orchestrate tier)/sales-observe-ai— Observe.AI platform help (enterprise contact center QA, 100% auto scoring, Agent Copilot, VoiceAI/ChatAI agents)/sales-nice-cxone— NICE CXone platform help (built-in QM with evaluation forms, screen + voice recording, Interaction Analytics)/sales-balto— Balto platform help (real-time AI coaching for contact centers, automated QA, compliance monitoring)/sales-salesken— Salesken platform help (real-time in-call coaching, QA automation, revenue intelligence, multilingual transcription)/sales-clari-copilot— Clari Copilot platform help (real-time battlecards, live coaching, AI call summaries, deal intelligence)/sales-weflow— Weflow platform help (Salesforce-native Revenue AI with activity capture, conversation intelligence, deal forecasting)/sales-do— Not sure which skill to use? The router matches any sales objective to the right skill. Install:npx skills add sales-skills/sales --skill sales-do
Gotchas
-
Don't score a call without a transcript or detailed description. Claude will confidently generate scores from thin air if given only "it was a discovery call." Push back and ask for specifics — what was said, how it ended, what objections came up.
-
Don't focus only on negatives. Claude tends to generate long lists of improvements. Always lead with the best moment and what went well before coaching points. Reps shut down if feedback feels like a list of failures.
-
Don't apply MEDDPICC scoring to a first discovery call. MEDDPICC elements like Paper Process and Competition are rarely uncovered in a first meeting. Score only the elements that were reasonable to address at this deal stage.
-
Don't ignore talk-to-listen ratio. This is one of the most objective and actionable metrics. If the user provides a transcript, estimate the ratio. If they describe the call, ask about it directly.
-
Don't treat the scorecard as a final verdict. A single call is a snapshot. Frame scores as "on this call" not "this rep is a 2/5 at discovery." Context matters — a rough call with a hostile prospect is different from a rough call with a warm lead.
-
Self-improving: If you discover something not covered here, append it to
references/learnings.mdwith today's date.
Examples
Example 1: Manager reviewing rep's discovery call
User says: "Review this discovery call — I talked for 70% of it, asked about their process, showed a quick demo, and ended with 'I'll send you info and we can reconnect next week.'" Skill does:
- Scores the call on all 9 dimensions (flags high talk ratio, surface discovery, vague next steps)
- Identifies the missed opportunity to dig deeper when the prospect described their process
- Provides 3 coaching recommendations with practice drills
- Drafts a follow-up email and next call agenda Result: Structured coaching feedback the manager can use in their 1:1
Example 2: MEDDPICC scoring
User says: "Score my rep's call using MEDDPICC — they confirmed pain and got metrics, but didn't ask about decision process or economic buyer." Skill does:
- Creates a MEDDPICC extraction table showing Metrics and Implicate the Pain as partially addressed
- Flags Decision Process, Economic Buyer, and Champion as critical gaps
- Provides specific questions for the next call to fill each gap Result: Clear MEDDPICC gap analysis with an actionable next-call plan
Troubleshooting
No transcript available
Solution: Have the rep describe what happened in detail — key moments, objections raised, how the call ended, and what was agreed. The skill can still provide a useful review from a narrative description, though transcript-based reviews are more precise.
Rep is defensive about feedback
Solution: Use the "best moment" analysis first to lead with what went well. Frame coaching points as "opportunities" not "mistakes." Focus on 1-2 highest-impact areas rather than listing every issue. The self-review mode (Step 1, option B) helps reps build self-awareness before receiving external feedback.
Scoring feels subjective
Solution: Ground every score in specific evidence from the call. Use the methodology layers (MEDDPICC, SPIN, Challenger) for more objective, criteria-based assessment. Compare scores across multiple calls to calibrate — a single call review is a snapshot, not a verdict.
Related Skills
sales-skills/sales-upviral
tools
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
UpViral platform help — viral referral marketing and list-building platform (by Emarky) for viral sweepstakes, giveaway/reward campaigns, pre-launch waiting lists, and milestone referral programs, with REST API (app.upviral.com/api/v1/), callback-URL webhooks, PHP SDK, fraud detection (IP-based suspicious-referral flagging), A/B testing, smart leaderboards, unlockable incentives, and 30+ native ESP/CRM integrations (Mailchimp, ActiveCampaign, ConvertKit, AWeber, HubSpot, Klaviyo, Intercom) plus Zapier/Make/Pipedream/Integrately/Pabbly. Use when UpViral campaigns aren't tracking referral points correctly, deciding between Starter $79/mo annual (10K leads, 1 brand, NO API) vs Business $119/mo (25K, 2 brands, API + webhooks unlocked) vs Premium $319/mo (100K, 5 brands, dedicated account manager), the API returns errors because you're on the Starter tier where API/webhooks are gated, building an UpViral→CRM or UpViral→data-warehouse pipeline with add_contact / get_leads / get_leads_points / add_points / get_custom_fields / lists methods (uvapikey + uvmethod form-encoded POST), interpreting fraud flags where same-IP referrals get marked suspicious and you must manually activate/delete/blacklist, setting up the Callback URL (webhook) to fire on reward-unlock events, Zapier New Lead / New Reward Unlocked triggers not firing, ClickFunnels/Shopify/funnel-builder integration breaking, the drag-and-drop page builder showing broken widgets or limited customization, the setup feeling long and complicated for your first campaign, or picking UpViral over Viral Loops / KickoffLabs / Vyper / Prefinery / Gleam / KingSumo / ShortStack for a viral campaign. Do NOT use for general newsletter audience growth strategy across all platforms (use /sales-audience-growth), newsletter monetization (use /sales-newsletter), KickoffLabs-specific help (use /sales-kickofflabs), no-code merge-tag newsletter referrals (use /sales-referralkit), SparkLoop paid recommendations (use /sales-sparkloop), or full-stack multi-level Level-1/2/3 referral/affiliate tracking (use /sales-referralhero).
39SKILL.mdUpdated Jun 4, 2026
sales-skills/sales-referralhero
development
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
ReferralHero platform help — full-stack referral, affiliate, waitlist, contest, and NPS platform with subscriber API, webhooks, Zapier, Mailchimp/Kit/AWeber/Klaviyo/ActiveCampaign/SendLane connectors, coupon codes, multi-level referral tracking (Level 1/2/3), anti-fraud, and 5,000 calls/hour rate limit. Use when ReferralHero campaigns aren't tracking referrals correctly, deciding between PRO $199/mo (10K members, includes API + webhooks) and PREMIUM $399/mo (50K members, adds ReCaptcha + SMS verification), authentication is failing with no_token or X-API-Key header is being ignored, multi-level referral counts (Level 2/3) aren't appearing for downline subscribers, coupon group endpoints return 404 or coupon arrays max out, hitting the 5,000 calls/hour soft limit and getting too_many_calls 429s, the Mailchimp/Kit native integration is double-adding subscribers, webhook payloads aren't firing on confirmation events, importing Stripe customer IDs through transaction tracking, generating reward fulfillment when subscribers cross milestone thresholds (promote/unlock_promoted_reward), comparing ReferralHero against SparkLoop/ReferralKit/Viral Loops/GrowSurf/KickoffLabs for referral marketing, or routing referral data via add_bulk_transactions (500-transaction batch limit). Do NOT use for general newsletter audience growth strategy (use /sales-audience-growth), general newsletter monetization (use /sales-newsletter), no-code newsletter-only referral with merge-tag insertion (use /sales-referralkit), SparkLoop's paid recommendations or partner network (use /sales-sparkloop), or affiliate program strategy across many platforms (use /sales-affiliate-program).
39SKILL.mdUpdated Jun 4, 2026
sales-skills/sales-kickofflabs
tools
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
KickoffLabs platform help — viral marketing platform for pre-launch waitlists, bonus-entry giveaways, milestone-reward referral programs, leaderboard giveaways, and email opt-in bribes with REST API v1 + v2, server-side webhooks (in/out), KOL.js JavaScript library, AnyForm script for custom pages, fraud detection (duplicate_ip / bounced / duplidate_email flags), SMS verification add-on, native ESP integrations (Klaviyo, Mailchimp, ActiveCampaign, Brevo), website builders (Webflow, Wix, Squarespace, Weebly), Shopify, Facebook Audiences, Slack, Zapier. Use when KickoffLabs viral campaigns aren't tracking referrals correctly, deciding between Hobby $13/mo annual (500 leads/mo no A/B no reward emails) vs Premium $48/mo (2.5K + A/B + reward emails + tracking pixels) vs Business $99/mo (10K + custom email templates + custom domains + advanced reporting + 3 team) vs Enterprise $202/mo (25K + 5 team + SMS included), API key getting rejected because you embedded it in client-side JavaScript instead of server-side, can't decide whether to use v1 /subscribe vs v2 /tags/:TAG_ID/lead for lead creation, webhook payloads firing with `__fraudulent` flag and you need to interpret the duplicate_ip/bounced/duplidate_email reason codes (yes, duplidate is spelled that way in their docs), AnyForm script not posting to KickoffLabs vs native API endpoint, leaderboard endpoint returning more than 50 leads is not allowed, social_id (kid in share URLs) attribution chain breaking between v1 and v2, contest score vs lead count metrics in the webhook payload are confusing, SMS Verification only available on Premium+ as $50/mo add-on (Enterprise includes), per-month lead cap auto-upgrades at $8 per 1000 overage leads, picking between KickoffLabs and Viral Loops / UpViral / Prefinery / ReferralCandy / Voucherify for viral campaign type fit, or rate limit per tier (10-100 calls/minute) is hitting on bulk imports. Do NOT use for general newsletter audience growth strategy (use /sales-audience-growth), general newsletter monetization (use /sales-newsletter), no-code merge-tag-only newsletter referrals (use /sales-referralkit), SparkLoop paid recommendations + partner network (use /sales-sparkloop), or full-stack referral/affiliate with multi-level Level-1/2/3 tracking (use /sales-referralhero).
39SKILL.mdUpdated Jun 4, 2026
sales-skills/sales-do
development
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Routes any sales, marketing, ad, or GTM objective to the right specialized skill and outputs the install command for that skill plus a ready-to-paste prompt packed with the user's context. Asks clarifying questions when the objective is ambiguous, then hands back a copy-paste-runnable next step. Covers prospecting, outbound cadences, deals, proposals, forecasting, deliverability, enrichment, intent, content, coaching, CRO, SEO, launch directories, newsletters, email/SMS/push marketing, chatbots, influencer marketing, social media, employee advocacy, media relations, reviews, data hygiene, B2B advertising, retargeting, affiliate, loyalty, digital products, memberships, webinars, checkout, and platform-specific help. Use when the user has a sales or marketing question and isn't sure which skill to use, or wants a multi-skill sequence with a batch install command. Do NOT use to solve problems directly — this skill only routes.
39SKILL.mdUpdated Apr 24, 2026