
Internal helper for /think Step 11. Renders SOW.md + Spec.md as an integrated Astro view and returns a dev server URL.
Scan ADR Decision sections against current code and report drift with modification direction and priority. Do NOT use for repos without ADRs (use audit-adr-gaps instead).
Internal helper for /think Step 11. Renders SOW.md + Spec.md as an integrated Astro view and returns a dev server URL.
Extract repository spec while detecting bugs, spec gaps, and consistency drift via dual-purpose documentation. OUTCOME.md-axis question-driven exploration with ephemeral output. Do NOT use for code review (use /audit or /polish), feature implementation (use /code), planning only (use /think), or single-bug fix (use /fix).
Web search, page fetch, and GitHub repo exploration via scout CLI.
Root cause analysis with 5 Whys.
Independent outcome-based assertion with Codex + audit reviewers. Emits ternary Ready / Ready (caveat) / NotReady gate from reconciled static + dynamic evidence. Do NOT use for quick code review (use /polish) or static-only audit (use /audit).
Extract repository spec while detecting bugs, spec gaps, and consistency drift via dual-purpose documentation. OUTCOME.md-axis question-driven exploration with ephemeral output. Do NOT use for code review (use /audit or /polish), feature implementation (use /code), planning only (use /think), or single-bug fix (use /fix).
Independent outcome-based assertion with Codex + audit reviewers. Emits ternary Ready / Ready (caveat) / NotReady gate from reconciled static + dynamic evidence. Do NOT use for quick code review (use /polish) or static-only audit (use /audit).
Two-phase challenge to a proposal/design/plan/analysis. Phase 1 grills the user with one-question-at-a-time interviews to surface assumptions and trade-offs. Phase 2 spawns critic-design with the surfaced material as devil's advocate input. Do NOT use for code review findings (use /audit) or outcome assertion (use /assert which has built-in adversarial testing).
TDD with RGRC cycle and Baby Steps.
Probe project and technical questions. Findings are positions to be challenged with explicit sources, not conclusions. Phase 5 advisor pass argues against the synthesis before it lands. Do NOT use for design planning or SOW/Spec generation (use /think instead).
Create Architecture Decision Records (ADR) in MADR v4 format with auto-numbering.
Two-phase challenge to a proposal/design/plan/analysis. Phase 1 grills the user with one-question-at-a-time interviews to surface assumptions and trade-offs. Phase 2 spawns critic-design with the surfaced material as devil's advocate input. Do NOT use for code review findings (use /audit) or outcome assertion (use /assert which has built-in adversarial testing).
Design exploration with built-in adversarial challenge (Step 4: critic-design). Generates SOW and Spec from approaches that survive the challenge. Do NOT use for codebase investigation without planning intent (use /research instead).
Probe project and technical questions. Findings are positions to be challenged with explicit sources, not conclusions. Phase 5 advisor pass argues against the synthesis before it lands. Do NOT use for design planning or SOW/Spec generation (use /think instead).
OWASP Top 10 security review. Do NOT use for readability (use-context-reviewer-readability), type errors (use-context-reviewer-strictness), or test design (use-context-reviewer-testability).
Rapidly fix small bugs and minor improvements in development environment. Do NOT use for new feature implementation or large-scale changes (use /code instead).
Internal helper for /pr. Reads PR body (Preview URL + How to Test), drives agent-browser to capture a screenshot (1 step) or a video (2+ steps), and returns the artifact path for manual attachment on GitHub web UI.
Workflow orchestration for /code.
Discover undocumented design decisions and challenge each candidate via critic-design before promotion. Rank by impact and reversibility, produce ADR promotion candidates. Treat each candidate as a position arguing for ADR status, not a fact to be filed. Pairs with audit-adr-drift, which scans existing ADRs for drift against code.
Scan ADR Decision sections against current code and report drift with modification direction and priority. Do NOT use for repos without ADRs (use audit-adr-gaps instead).
Analyze Git changes and suggest appropriate branch names.
Analyze Git diff and generate Conventional Commits format messages.
Silent failure detection. Use when: silent failure, empty catch, エラーハンドリング, 握りつぶし, swallowed error. Do NOT use for security (reviewing-security), readability (reviewing-readability), or type safety (reviewing-type-safety).
React/Next.js performance rules from Vercel Engineering. Triggers on: React components, Next.js pages, data fetching, bundle optimization.
CLI tools guide (git, gh, npm). Use when: git操作, gh コマンド, npm スクリプト, HEREDOC コミット, CHANGELOG.
SOW/Spec cross-document consistency validation. Use when: 整合性チェック, consistency check, spec validation, 仕様検証.
PR screening review before human review. Use when: スクリーニングレビュー, PRレビュー支援, レビュー前チェック, PR screening, pre-review.
File-by-file read-through diagnostic to surface anomalies that fixed checklists miss. Use when: 通読, 違和感, 読み通し, 気になるとこ, read-through, anomaly scout, file-by-file review. Do NOT use for full audit (use /audit), PR screening (use /preview), or readability review (use reviewing-readability).
Read-through scan wrapper. Invokes scouting-anomalies on a file or glob. Use when user mentions /scout, scout, 通読スキャン, read-through, 違和感拾い, 気になるとこ洗い出し. Do NOT use for full audit (use /audit) or PR screening (use /preview).
Silent failure detection. Use when: silent failure, empty catch, エラーハンドリング, 握りつぶし, swallowed error. Do NOT use for security (reviewing-security), readability (reviewing-readability), or type safety (reviewing-type-safety).
Web app browser verification with screenshots. Reads operation_check.md, executes each step via agent-browser, and generates a self-contained HTML report with Base64-embedded screenshots. Use when: ブラウザ動作確認, スクショレポート, browser verification, screenshot report, operation check. Do NOT use for automated E2E tests (use /code with playwright).
Frontend performance optimization. Use when: performance, Web Vitals, LCP, FID, CLS, パフォーマンス最適化, 速度改善, bundle size.
Storybook integration with spec.md. Auto-generates Stories from Component API. Use when: storybook, stories, props, argTypes, variants, CSF3.
Binary Ready/NotReady gate for SOW/Spec. Use when: 設計書レビュー, 実装可否判定, document gate.
Workflow orchestration for /code, /fix, /audit. Use when: /code ワークフロー, /fix ワークフロー, quality gates, 品質ゲート, RGRC サイクル.
Structured ADR creation in MADR format. Use when: ADR, Architecture Decision, 決定記録, 技術選定, アーキテクチャ決定, deprecation, 非推奨化.
Analyze Git changes and suggest appropriate branch names.
Discover undocumented design decisions and challenge each candidate via critic-design before promotion. Rank by impact and reversibility, produce ADR promotion candidates. Treat each candidate as a position arguing for ADR status, not a fact to be filed. Pairs with audit-adr-drift, which scans existing ADRs for drift against code.
Internal helper for /pr. Reads PR body (Preview URL + How to Test), drives agent-browser to capture a screenshot (1 step) or a video (2+ steps), and returns the artifact path for manual attachment on GitHub web UI.
Orchestrate reviewer agents under adversarial challenge (critic-audit + critic-evidence). Findings are positions to be argued, not facts to be aggregated. Do NOT use for quick PR screening (use /preview instead).
--- name: root-cause-analysis description: Root cause analysis with 5 Whys. Use when: root cause, 5 Whys, なぜなぜ分析, 根本原因, 原因分析, symptom fix, 対症療法. allowed-tools: [Read, Grep, Glob, Task] context: fork user-invocable: false --- # Root Cause Analysis - 5 Whys ## Principle Fix the root cause, not the symptom. Symptom fixes add complexity; root-cause fixes prevent recurrence. ## 5 Whys Process Ask "why" five times, descending through abstraction levels. | Step | Level | | ----
Code readability review. Use when: 可読性, 明確, 命名, 変数名, 関数名, ネスト, 関数設計, コメント, 複雑, Miller's Law, ミラーの法則, 認知負荷, AI-generated, 過剰設計. Do NOT use for security (reviewing-security), type errors (reviewing-type-safety), error handling (reviewing-silent-failures), or test design (reviewing-testability).
Extract ubiquitous language from Slack and generate domain glossary. Use when user mentions 用語集, glossary, ユビキタス言語, ドメイン用語, Slack から用語.
Workflow orchestration for /code, /fix, /audit. Use when: /code ワークフロー, /fix ワークフロー, quality gates, 品質ゲート, RGRC サイクル.
TDD with RGRC cycle and Baby Steps. Use when: TDD, テスト駆動, Red-Green-Refactor, Baby Steps.
--- name: yomu-search description: Semantic code search (concept/identifier/related) for TS/JSX/CSS/HTML/Rust/Markdown via yomu CLI. Use when: concept search, identifier lookup, related code, 意味検索, 概念検索, hooks that do Y, where does X happen, unknown identifier. allowed-tools: [Bash, Read] user-invocable: false --- # yomu-search ## Commands | Purpose | Command | | ----------------- | ---------------------------------------------------
Access Google Sheets and Docs via gcloud CLI. Use when user shares a Google Sheets/Docs URL or mentions スプレッドシート, Sheets, Docs, Google ドキュメント.
--- name: refactor-scout description: Weekly code quality patrol: review target repositories and report refactoring candidates as GitHub issues --- Review repositories and report areas for improvement as GitHub issues. ## Target Repositories | Repository | Branch | |-----------|---------| | thkt/kagami | main | | thkt/recall | main | ## Procedure Execute the following for each repository: ### 1. Clone Repository ```bash gh repo clone {repo} /tmp/refactor-scout-{repo_name} -- --depth 1 --b
Root cause analysis with 5 Whys. Use when: root cause, 5 Whys, なぜなぜ分析, 根本原因, 原因分析, symptom fix, 対症療法.
Fundamental software principles - SOLID, DRY, Occam's Razor, Miller's Law, YAGNI, Readable Code. Use when: 原則, シンプル, 複雑, リファクタリング, 保守性, clean code, best practice.
Framework-agnostic frontend component design patterns. Use when: component patterns, Container/Presentational, フロントエンドパターン, コンポーネント設計.
Slack conversation harvesting and term extraction. Internal module for /glossary. Use when: ユビキタス言語, 用語集, glossary, ドメイン用語.
Enrich a vague prompt by routing to the best skill or injecting relevant rules and constraints. Use when prompt is rough or missing perspective. Examples: "find bugs", "refactor this", "add feature X", プロンプト補完, ブラッシュアップ. Do NOT use when the prompt is already detailed.
Extract ubiquitous language from Slack and generate domain glossary. Use when user mentions 用語集, glossary, ユビキタス言語, ドメイン用語, Slack から用語.
Testable code design review. Use when: テスト容易性, モック, mock-friendly, DI. Do NOT use for type safety (reviewing-type-safety), security (reviewing-security), or readability (reviewing-readability).
Proofread and auto-fix Japanese text using textlint. Use when user mentions 校正して, kousei, textlint, 日本語チェック, 文章チェック.
OWASP Top 10 security review. Use when: security, OWASP, XSS, SQL injection, セキュリティ, 脆弱性, cloud security, AWS, IAM, Terraform, クラウドセキュリティ, インフラ. Do NOT use for readability (reviewing-readability), type errors (reviewing-type-safety), or test design (reviewing-testability).
Independent outcome-based verification with Codex + audit reviewers. Emits binary Ready/NotReady gate from reconciled static + dynamic evidence. Use when user mentions 検証して, verify, 独立検証, outcome verification, gate decision, trust score (legacy), adversarial testing. Do NOT use for quick code review (use /polish) or static-only audit (use /audit).
Tailwind CSS v4 design decisions. Use when: Tailwind, utility-first, container query, design tokens, dark mode strategy.
Start Discord auto-response loop. Use when user mentions watch, discord watch, auto-response.
Structured ADR creation in MADR format. Use when: ADR, Architecture Decision, 決定記録, 技術選定, アーキテクチャ決定, deprecation, 非推奨化.
Slack conversation harvesting and term extraction. Internal module for /glossary. Use when: ユビキタス言語, 用語集, glossary, ドメイン用語.
TDD with RGRC cycle and Baby Steps. Use when: TDD, テスト駆動, Red-Green-Refactor, Baby Steps.
Proofread and auto-fix Japanese text using textlint. Use when user mentions 校正して, kousei, textlint, 日本語チェック, 文章チェック.
OWASP Top 10 security review. Use when: security, OWASP, XSS, SQL injection, セキュリティ, 脆弱性, cloud security, AWS, IAM, Terraform, クラウドセキュリティ, インフラ. Do NOT use for readability (reviewing-readability), type errors (reviewing-type-safety), or test design (reviewing-testability).
Code readability review. Use when: 可読性, 明確, 命名, 変数名, 関数名, ネスト, 関数設計, コメント, 複雑, Miller's Law, ミラーの法則, 認知負荷, AI-generated, 過剰設計. Do NOT use for security (reviewing-security), type errors (reviewing-type-safety), error handling (reviewing-silent-failures), or test design (reviewing-testability).
Tailwind CSS v4 design decisions. Use when: Tailwind, utility-first, container query, design tokens, dark mode strategy.
TypeScript type safety review. Do NOT use for testability (use-context-reviewer-testability), security (use-context-reviewer-security), or readability (use-context-reviewer-readability).
Frontend performance optimization.
Semantic code search (concept/identifier/related) for TS/JSX/CSS/HTML/Rust/Markdown via yomu CLI.
OWASP Top 10 security review. Do NOT use for readability (use-context-reviewer-readability), type errors (use-context-reviewer-strictness), or test design (use-context-reviewer-testability).
AI screening review for PRs - preliminary check before human review. Do NOT use for deep multi-reviewer code quality audits (use /audit instead).
Silent failure detection. Do NOT use for security (use-context-reviewer-security), readability (use-context-reviewer-readability), or type safety (use-context-reviewer-strictness).
Empirical prompt tuning loop. Dispatch fresh subagents against skill/agent/command prompts, collect ambiguities, patch one at a time.
Code readability review. Do NOT use for security (use-context-reviewer-security), type errors (use-context-reviewer-strictness), error handling (use-context-reviewer-silence), or test design (use-context-reviewer-testability).
Silent failure detection. Do NOT use for security (use-context-reviewer-security), readability (use-context-reviewer-readability), or type safety (use-context-reviewer-strictness).
Testable code design review. Do NOT use for type safety (use-context-reviewer-strictness), security (use-context-reviewer-security), or readability (use-context-reviewer-readability).
TypeScript type safety review. Do NOT use for testability (use-context-reviewer-testability), security (use-context-reviewer-security), or readability (use-context-reviewer-readability).
Code readability review. Do NOT use for security (use-context-reviewer-security), type errors (use-context-reviewer-strictness), error handling (use-context-reviewer-silence), or test design (use-context-reviewer-testability).
SOW/Spec cross-document consistency validation.
--- name: yomu-search description: Semantic code search (concept/identifier/related) for TS/JSX/CSS/HTML/Rust/Markdown via yomu CLI. Use when: concept search, identifier lookup, related code, 意味検索, 概念検索, hooks that do Y, where does X happen, unknown identifier. allowed-tools: [Bash, Read] user-invocable: false --- # yomu-search ## Commands | Purpose | Command | | ----------------- | ---------------------------------------------------
--- name: root-cause-analysis description: Root cause analysis with 5 Whys. Use when: root cause, 5 Whys, なぜなぜ分析, 根本原因, 原因分析, symptom fix, 対症療法. allowed-tools: [Read, Grep, Glob, Task] context: fork user-invocable: false --- # Root Cause Analysis - 5 Whys ## Principle Fix the root cause, not the symptom. Symptom fixes add complexity; root-cause fixes prevent recurrence. ## 5 Whys Process Ask "why" five times, descending through abstraction levels. | Step | Level | | ----
Web search, page fetch, and GitHub repo exploration via scout CLI. Use when: web search, page fetch, deep research, GitHub repo exploration, latest docs, release notes, library docs, external info, WebFetch alternative, WebSearch alternative, 最新ドキュメント, リリースノート, 外部情報.
Web search, page fetch, and GitHub repo exploration via scout CLI. Use when: web search, page fetch, deep research, GitHub repo exploration, latest docs, release notes, library docs, external info, WebFetch alternative, WebSearch alternative, 最新ドキュメント, リリースノート, 外部情報.
--- name: recall-search description: Search past Claude Code/Codex sessions via recall CLI. Use when: 前に, あの時, また同じ, あの件, past decisions, recurring mistake, module first contact, BACKLOG task pickup, temporal reference, structural echo, vague back-reference. allowed-tools: [Bash, Read] user-invocable: false --- # recall-search ## Triggers (call without deliberation) | Trigger | Signal | | -------------------- | ----------------------------------
--- name: recall-search description: Search past Claude Code/Codex sessions via recall CLI. Use when: 前に, あの時, また同じ, あの件, past decisions, recurring mistake, module first contact, BACKLOG task pickup, temporal reference, structural echo, vague back-reference. allowed-tools: [Bash, Read] user-invocable: false --- # recall-search ## Triggers (call without deliberation) | Trigger | Signal | | -------------------- | ----------------------------------
--- name: google-workspace description: Access Google Sheets and Docs via gcloud CLI. Use when: Google Sheets/Docs URL, スプレッドシート, Sheets, Docs, Google ドキュメント. allowed-tools: [Bash, Read] user-invocable: false --- # Google Workspace ## Commands | Type | URL Pattern | Default | Structured | | ------ | --------------------------------- | ----------------------- | ----------------------------------------------- | | Sheet
--- name: google-workspace description: Access Google Sheets and Docs via gcloud CLI. Use when: Google Sheets/Docs URL, スプレッドシート, Sheets, Docs, Google ドキュメント. allowed-tools: [Bash, Read] user-invocable: false --- # Google Workspace ## Commands | Type | URL Pattern | Default | Structured | | ------ | --------------------------------- | ----------------------- | ----------------------------------------------- | | Sheet
Create Architecture Decision Records (ADR) in MADR v4 format with auto-numbering.
Implement code following TDD/RGRC cycle with real-time test feedback. Vertical slices only (one test then one impl, never bulk tests then bulk impl). Do NOT use for small bug fixes or error resolution (use /fix instead).
Implement code following TDD/RGRC cycle with real-time test feedback. Vertical slices only (one test then one impl, never bulk tests then bulk impl). Do NOT use for small bug fixes or error resolution (use /fix instead).
TDD with RGRC cycle and Baby Steps.
Light adversarial probe + cleanup. Codex + CodeRabbit + Antigravity findings are challenged by critic-audit, not aggregated as facts. Do NOT use for deep multi-reviewer audits (use /audit).
AI screening review for PRs - preliminary check before human review. Do NOT use for deep multi-reviewer code quality audits (use /audit instead).
Large-scale parallel implementation with multi-agent swarm. Architect + QA + Implementer(s) collaborate via peer DM.
Comprehensive feature development with exploration, architecture, TDD, and quality gates. Do NOT use for implementation without planning (use /code), bug fixes (use /fix), or planning only without implementation (use /think).
Generate GitHub Issue with structured title and body. Premise check + critic-design challenge verify drafted claims before posting.
Generate GitHub Issue with structured title and body. Premise check + critic-design challenge verify drafted claims before posting.
Semantic code search (concept/identifier/related) for TS/JSX/CSS/HTML/Rust/Markdown via yomu CLI.
Explore codebase structure via iterative SQL queries against yomu's indexed SQLite DB. Do NOT use for concept/semantic search (use use-cli-yomu) or literal string search (use ugrep).
Rapidly fix small bugs and minor improvements in development environment. Do NOT use for new feature implementation or large-scale changes (use /code instead).
Empirical prompt tuning loop. Dispatch fresh subagents against skill/agent/command prompts, collect ambiguities, patch one at a time.
Read and write Heptabase cards, journals, notes, tags, and AI Tutor data via heptabase CLI. All output is JSON.
Analyze Git diff and generate Conventional Commits format messages.
Comprehensive feature development with exploration, architecture, TDD, and quality gates. Do NOT use for implementation without planning (use /code), bug fixes (use /fix), or planning only without implementation (use /think).
Large-scale parallel implementation with multi-agent swarm. Architect + QA + Implementer(s) collaborate via peer DM.
Access Google Sheets and Docs via gcloud CLI.
Access Google Sheets and Docs via gcloud CLI.
GitHub CLI (gh) guide.
GitHub CLI (gh) guide.
Git CLI guide.
Git CLI guide.
Read and write Heptabase cards, journals, notes, tags, and AI Tutor data via heptabase CLI. All output is JSON.
npm scripts and CHANGELOG tools.
npm scripts and CHANGELOG tools.
Web search, page fetch, and GitHub repo exploration via scout CLI.
Frontend performance optimization.
Analyze branch changes and generate PR description.
Search past Claude Code/Codex sessions via recall CLI.
Search past Claude Code/Codex sessions via recall CLI.
SOW/Spec cross-document consistency validation.
Testable code design review. Do NOT use for type safety (use-context-reviewer-strictness), security (use-context-reviewer-security), or readability (use-context-reviewer-readability).
Root cause analysis with 5 Whys.
Workflow orchestration for /code.
Analyze branch changes and generate PR description.
--- name: refactor-scout description: Weekly code quality patrol: review target repositories and report refactoring candidates as GitHub issues --- Review repositories and report areas for improvement as GitHub issues. ## Target Repositories | Repository | Branch | |-----------|---------| | thkt/kagami | main | | thkt/recall | main | ## Procedure Execute the following for each repository: ### 1. Clone Repository ```bash gh repo clone {repo} /tmp/refactor-scout-{repo_name} -- --depth 1 --b
Access Google Sheets and Docs via gcloud CLI. Use when user shares a Google Sheets/Docs URL or mentions スプレッドシート, Sheets, Docs, Google ドキュメント.
Root cause analysis with 5 Whys. Use when: root cause, 5 Whys, なぜなぜ分析, 根本原因, 原因分析, symptom fix, 対症療法.
Fundamental software principles - SOLID, DRY, Occam's Razor, Miller's Law, YAGNI, Readable Code. Use when: 原則, シンプル, 複雑, リファクタリング, 保守性, clean code, best practice.
Framework-agnostic frontend component design patterns. Use when: component patterns, Container/Presentational, フロントエンドパターン, コンポーネント設計.
Enrich a vague prompt by routing to the best skill or injecting relevant rules and constraints. Use when prompt is rough or missing perspective. Examples: "find bugs", "refactor this", "add feature X", プロンプト補完, ブラッシュアップ. Do NOT use when the prompt is already detailed.
Binary Ready/NotReady gate for SOW/Spec. Use when: 設計書レビュー, 実装可否判定, document gate.
Storybook integration with spec.md. Auto-generates Stories from Component API. Use when: storybook, stories, props, argTypes, variants, CSF3.
Frontend performance optimization. Use when: performance, Web Vitals, LCP, FID, CLS, パフォーマンス最適化, 速度改善, bundle size.
Web app browser verification with screenshots. Reads operation_check.md, executes each step via agent-browser, and generates a self-contained HTML report with Base64-embedded screenshots. Use when: ブラウザ動作確認, スクショレポート, browser verification, screenshot report, operation check. Do NOT use for automated E2E tests (use /code with playwright).
Testable code design review. Use when: テスト容易性, モック, mock-friendly, DI. Do NOT use for type safety (reviewing-type-safety), security (reviewing-security), or readability (reviewing-readability).
TypeScript type safety review. Use when: type safety, any, 型安全, 型カバレッジ, strict mode. Do NOT use for testability (reviewing-testability), security (reviewing-security), or readability (reviewing-readability).
Read-through scan wrapper. Invokes scouting-anomalies on a file or glob. Use when user mentions /scout, scout, 通読スキャン, read-through, 違和感拾い, 気になるとこ洗い出し. Do NOT use for full audit (use /audit) or PR screening (use /preview).
File-by-file read-through diagnostic to surface anomalies that fixed checklists miss. Use when: 通読, 違和感, 読み通し, 気になるとこ, read-through, anomaly scout, file-by-file review. Do NOT use for full audit (use /audit), PR screening (use /preview), or readability review (use reviewing-readability).
PR screening review before human review. Use when: スクリーニングレビュー, PRレビュー支援, レビュー前チェック, PR screening, pre-review.
CLI tools guide (git, gh, npm). Use when: git操作, gh コマンド, npm スクリプト, HEREDOC コミット, CHANGELOG.
SOW/Spec cross-document consistency validation. Use when: 整合性チェック, consistency check, spec validation, 仕様検証.
React/Next.js performance rules from Vercel Engineering. Triggers on: React components, Next.js pages, data fetching, bundle optimization.
Independent outcome-based verification with Codex + audit reviewers. Emits binary Ready/NotReady gate from reconciled static + dynamic evidence. Use when user mentions 検証して, verify, 独立検証, outcome verification, gate decision, trust score (legacy), adversarial testing. Do NOT use for quick code review (use /polish) or static-only audit (use /audit).
Start Discord auto-response loop. Use when user mentions watch, discord watch, auto-response.
Discover undocumented design decisions and challenge each candidate via critic-design before promotion. Rank by impact and reversibility, produce ADR promotion candidates. Treat each candidate as a position arguing for ADR status, not a fact to be filed.
Orchestrate reviewer agents under adversarial challenge (critic-audit + critic-evidence). Findings are positions to be argued, not facts to be aggregated. Do NOT use for quick PR screening (use /preview instead).
Light adversarial probe + cleanup. Codex + CodeRabbit + Antigravity findings are challenged by critic-audit, not aggregated as facts. Do NOT use for deep multi-reviewer audits (use /audit).
Surface the current session's tentative reflection (realization / judgment / counterfactual) and optionally promote it to the durable knowledge store. Escape hatch for when Stop hook reflection extraction failed.
Explore codebase structure via iterative SQL queries against yomu's indexed SQLite DB. Do NOT use for concept/semantic search (use use-cli-yomu) or literal string search (use ugrep).
Surface the current session's tentative reflection (realization / judgment / counterfactual) and optionally promote it to the durable knowledge store. Escape hatch for when Stop hook reflection extraction failed.
Design exploration with built-in adversarial challenge (Step 4: critic-design). Generates SOW and Spec from approaches that survive the challenge. Do NOT use for codebase investigation without planning intent (use /research instead).
Discover undocumented design decisions and challenge each candidate via critic-design before promotion. Rank by impact and reversibility, produce ADR promotion candidates. Treat each candidate as a position arguing for ADR status, not a fact to be filed.
TypeScript type safety review. Use when: type safety, any, 型安全, 型カバレッジ, strict mode. Do NOT use for testability (reviewing-testability), security (reviewing-security), or readability (reviewing-readability).