thkt/use-workflow-spec-validation

Workflow: SOW/Spec Validation

ID System

| Document | Prefix | Links To | | -------- | ------- | ---------------- | | SOW | AC-N | - | | Spec | FR-NNN | Implements: AC-N | | Spec | T-NNN | FR: FR-NNN | | Spec | NFR-NNN | Validates: AC-N | | Spec | AS-NNN | - |

Priority levels (P0/P1/P2) and the Gate rule are defined by the reviewer-spec agent. Each check below assigns priority per finding type.

Checks

Run P0-producing checks (1-3) first. If any P0 is raised, downstream checks may be skipped. The gate will already be NotReady.

1. AC→FR Traceability [P0 candidate]

Each AC-N must have ≥1 FR with Implements: AC-N.

| Finding | Priority | | ------------------------------------ | -------- | | AC has no FR implementing it | P0 | | Orphan FR implements non-existent AC | P1 |

2. FR→Test Coverage [P0 candidate]

Each FR-NNN must have ≥1 T-NNN with matching FR reference.

| Finding | Priority | | ------------------------------- | -------- | | FR has no test scenario | P0 | | Test references non-existent FR | P1 |

3. Traceability Matrix Integrity [P0 candidate]

| Column | Must exist in | | ------ | ------------------------- | | AC | SOW Acceptance Criteria | | FR | Spec Functional Req table | | Test | Spec Test Scenarios | | NFR | Spec NFR table |

| Finding | Priority | | ------------------------------------- | -------- | | Matrix row references non-existent ID | P0 | | Matrix row missing expected column | P1 |

4. Scope↔Implementation [P1 candidate]

SOW In-Scope targets must appear in Spec phases. Extra files → P2.

5. Contradiction Detection [P0/P1 candidate]

Cross-check SOW↔Spec for technology mismatches, numeric conflicts.

| Finding | Priority | | ----------------------------------------- | -------- | | SOW and Spec specify conflicting tech | P0 | | SOW and Spec specify conflicting numerics | P0 | | Terminology used inconsistently | P1 |

6. Ambiguous Expressions [P0 candidate]

| Language | Patterns | | -------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | | JA | 適切に、できる限り、なるべく、ある程度、検討する、考慮する、予定、高速に(数値なし) | | EN | appropriately, as much as possible, reasonable, adequate, TBD, fast(no metric) |

| Finding | Priority | | ----------------------------------------- | -------- | | Ambiguous term inside a SHALL clause (FR) | P0 | | Ambiguous term in NFR Target | P0 | | Ambiguous term elsewhere | P1 |

7. Terminology Consistency [P1 candidate]

Same concept must use same term across documents.

| Finding | Priority | | ----------------------------------------- | -------- | | Synonym mixing (user/member) in same role | P1 | | Abbreviation mixing (DB/database) | P2 |

8. Column Completeness [P0/P1/P2 candidate]

| Finding | Priority | | ---------------------------------------------- | -------- | | AC Observable signal column empty (SOW) | P0 | | In Scope Observable outcome column empty (SOW) | P1 | | NFR Rationale column empty | P1 | | Assumption Impact-if-broken column empty | P1 | | Dependency Purpose column empty | P2 |

Risks column rules (Probability/Mitigation × Impact) are delegated to the reviewer-spec Risks Completeness section.

9. Phase Dependency [P1 candidate]

Implementation table must declare Depends. Empty Depends blocks parallel scheduling judgment.

| Finding | Priority | | -------------------------- | -------- | | Phase Depends column empty | P1 |

10. YAGNI Compliance [P2]

With YAGNI Checklist: verify Spec excludes checked items. Flag over-engineering.

11. Scope Integrity [P0/P1 candidate]

SOW In Scope and Out of Scope must not overlap. ACs must target only In Scope.

| Finding | Priority | | ------------------------------------------- | -------- | | In Scope target also listed in Out of Scope | P0 | | AC references a target absent from In Scope | P1 | | Out of Scope lacks Why not justification | P2 |

Output

Markdown appended to reviewer findings.

## Consistency Findings

| ID      | Priority | Check      | Location                         | CC Impact                          | Fix                                  |
| ------- | -------- | ---------- | -------------------------------- | ---------------------------------- | ------------------------------------ |
| CON-001 | P0/P1/P2 | check name | sow.md:section / spec.md:section | What CC will do when it reads this | Concrete rewrite, not "clarify this" |

Finding format and Gate contribution follow the reviewer-spec agent.