skills/bug-receipt/SKILL.md
Close bugs and incidents with an auditable BUG RECEIPT and VERIFIED, PARTIAL, or BLOCKED status. Use for defect repair, regression proof, production incidents, and issue closeout.
npx skillsauth add williamlimasilva/.copilot bug-receiptInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
For every bug or incident closeout decision, return the complete receipt below as the entire user-facing result, even when the user requests a concise reply or does not name this format. Concision shortens field values; it never removes or renames a row. Do not replace the receipt with prose.
BUG RECEIPT · VERIFIED | PARTIAL | BLOCKED
Problem <observed defect and intended behavior>
Baseline <failing interaction or command and decisive result; or not run>
Root cause <proven mechanism; or unproven hypothesis>
Change <responsible change; or none>
Proof <supplied or executed check: result; include every decisive layer>
Gaps <none; or exact missing proof and single next experiment/package>
Source executed now | supplied | mixed
Use not run, unproven, or none explicitly. Never omit a row to make the receipt look complete.
Before editing, record the observed problem, intended behavior, strongest direct check, and evidence source: executed now, supplied, or mixed. Never imply that supplied evidence was executed in the current run.
Reproduce the failure with the narrowest safe check when possible. If reproduction is unavailable, preserve the evidence obtained and cap the result at PARTIAL or BLOCKED.
Do not convert a plausible patch, stale log, source read, or passing build into proof of the user-visible behavior.
Run only checks required by the affected contract:
Use these decisive boundaries:
| Surface | Required direct proof | | --- | --- | | Logic or failing test | Original failing input or focused test now passes | | UI behavior | Real interaction plus relevant console and network observation | | API or integration | Request, response, and responsible service behavior | | Persistence | Write/read or reload round trip through the real owner path | | Race or lifecycle | Repeated concurrent trigger; zero-or-one success; affected-row and transaction evidence; final invariant | | Cross-system blocker | One sanitized failing request/response with timestamp or request ID, edge and application logs, and identity-provider logs when the trace reaches that owner |
VERIFIED: observed baseline, concrete cause, responsible change, all declared checks passed, no material gap.PARTIAL: useful evidence exists, but a required proof layer is missing or inconclusive.BLOCKED: a specific external condition prevents reproduction, repair, or proof.For PARTIAL or BLOCKED, name the single minimal experiment or correlated evidence package that closes the decisive gap. Never invent a command, observation, count, location, or result.
For a machine-readable receipt or CI integration, read references/receipt-contract.md and conform to its JSON fields and status invariants.
When a JSON artifact is requested, start from assets/receipt.template.json, write it to a task-owned path, and validate it with node scripts/validate-receipt.mjs <receipt.json> from this skill directory. Do not commit the generated receipt unless the user requests it.
Originally published at https://github.com/lMysticl/bug-receipt under the MIT License.
development
Anxiety-aware, evidence-driven collaboration for stalled or high-stakes work when a user says uncertainty, repeated setbacks, or lack of visible progress is causing significant anxiety or distress. Use immediately when explicitly invoked; when this fit is only inferred from the user's own account, ask permission before applying it. Preserve the user's ideal and turn grounded perspective-taking into persistent, bounded problem solving. Do not use to diagnose, provide therapy, manufacture certainty, or lower goals for reassurance.
development
Build, review, debug, package, and test Roslyn diagnostic analyzers, code fix providers, and incremental source generators. Use for DiagnosticAnalyzer, CodeFixProvider, IIncrementalGenerator, IOperation analysis, Microsoft.CodeAnalysis dependency pinning, Roslyn test harnesses, C#/VB tests, and analyzer NuGet packaging.
testing
Migrates a project that uses checked-in .designer.cs files behind .resx to using a source-generator instead
development
Polish any GitHub repository's surface — labels (emoji rating tiers, P0–P3 priority, impact severity), issue forms, PR template, CI workflows, CODEOWNERS, rulesets, docs. Repo meta & config only — no code logic touched. Use when creating a new repo or polishing an existing one.