skills/repo-standardizer/SKILL.md
Polish any GitHub repository's surface — labels (emoji rating tiers, P0–P3 priority, impact severity), issue forms, PR template, CI workflows, CODEOWNERS, rulesets, docs. Repo meta & config only — no code logic touched. Use when creating a new repo or polishing an existing one.
npx skillsauth add williamlimasilva/.copilot repo-standardizerInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Detect a repository's current state, then polish its surface: issue forms, PR template, label taxonomy, CI, CODEOWNERS, rulesets, docs. Works on repo metadata and config files only — code logic is never touched. Idempotent — safe to re-run; fills gaps and reconciles drift without duplicating or clobbering.
Requires:
ghCLI (authenticated),git,jq,python3— verify they exist before starting (which gh git jq python3).
gh auth status 2>/dev/null || echo "NOT_LOGGED_IN"
gh api user -q .login so the user knows which account will act.gh auth login (web/device flow), orexport GH_TOKEN=ghp_xxx — needs repo, workflow (for CI files) and, for org repos, admin:org (or admin:repo_hook / org membership admin) scopes.gh auth login is impossible in this environment (headless), suggest gh auth login --with-token reading from a file the user created.Verify the acting account can write to the target:
# user repos: no extra check needed beyond token scopes
# org repos: must be a member/admin of the org
gh api "orgs/ORG/memberships/$(gh api user -q .login)" -q .role 2>/dev/null || echo "NO_ORG_ACCESS"
admin/member → OK. 404 → stop and ask the user to add the account to the org first.gh repo view OWNER/REPO --json name,owner,visibility,defaultBranchRef,isArchived,isFork \
-q '{name:.name, ownerType:.owner.type, visibility:.visibility, defaultBranch:.defaultBranchRef.name, archived:.isArchived, fork:.isFork}'
| Field | Meaning | Consequence |
|---|---|---|
| ownerType | User = personal, Organization = org | Org repos can also use org-level rulesets; both support repo-level rulesets |
| visibility | PUBLIC / PRIVATE / INTERNAL | Private: skip public-facing docs pressure, keep CI secrets minimal; public: README badges + CONTRIBUTING/SECURITY matter |
| archived / fork | Read-only / fork | Skip write modules; report why |
If the repo was not explicitly named by the user, confirm before touching an org or private repository.
gh label list --repo OWNER/REPO --limit 200
gh api repos/OWNER/REPO/contents/.github -q '.[].path' 2>/dev/null || echo "no .github dir"
gh api repos/OWNER/REPO/contents/.github/workflows -q '.[].name' 2>/dev/null || echo "no workflows"
gh api repos/OWNER/REPO/rulesets -q '.[] | {name:.name, enforcement:.enforcement}' 2>/dev/null || echo "no rulesets"
gh api repos/OWNER/REPO/branches -q '.[].name' 2>/dev/null
for f in README.md CONTRIBUTING.md SECURITY.md LICENSE .gitignore; do
gh api "repos/OWNER/REPO/contents/$f" -q .name 2>/dev/null || echo "missing: $f"
done
Check for these signals (first match wins):
gh api repos/OWNER/REPO/contents/package.json -q .name 2>/dev/null # node → templates/ci-node.yml
gh api repos/OWNER/REPO/contents/pyproject.toml -q .name 2>/dev/null # python → templates/ci-python.yml
gh api repos/OWNER/REPO/contents/go.mod -q .name 2>/dev/null # go → templates/ci-go.yml
gh api repos/OWNER/REPO/contents/Cargo.toml -q .name 2>/dev/null # rust → templates/ci-rust.yml
No signal → propose the generic CI (or ask the user whether CI is wanted at all).
CONTRIBUTING.md and the PR template should be
written in (default: English, or the project's primary language for local
projects). Translate the templates accordingly when generating — never
assume a language.Ask the user whether the repo has any automation bots or AI writers running on it — e.g. dependabot, a Stale bot, ClawSweeper, or an AI coding agent that auto-files PRs / auto-fixes issues.
r:* / clawsweeper:* / triage:* / close:* labels are
signal labels, not categories — a bot reads them and acts (auto-close,
auto-lock, auto-fix, auto-merge). Without running automation those labels
are dead weight, so the answer decides whether the Governance dimension is
added at all (Module A, Step 2).Governance / auto-close rules dimension (add only the
r:* rules matching the project's real reject criteria).r:* / bot labels to a
repo with no automation.applied / skipped / failed checklist.Step 1 — Profile the project (adjust the taxonomy, never copy blindly):
rating: 🧂 unranked krab → rating: 🦪 silver shellfish →
rating: 🦐 gold shrimp → rating: 🦀 challenger crab →
rating: 🐚 platinum hermit → rating: 🦞 diamond lobstergrade: S/A/B/C/D or ★–★★★★★)team: * label
per group (e.g. team: frontend, team: algorithm). No team list → skip.dependencies, security, docs, …).r:* / clawsweeper:* / triage:* /
close:* names are matched literally by automation code (almost always
English). Keep those names in the bot's language — a translated name
breaks the bot. Only their description may use the user's language.Step 2 — Compose categories. Baseline lives in templates/labels.json
(plain names, no emoji); extend or trim per the profile in Step 1.
Emoji policy — rating tiers are the ONLY mandatory-emoji labels. Every
rating:* / issue-rating:* tier MUST carry an emoji with a clear low→high
gradient (e.g. rating: 🦞 diamond lobster). All other labels: emoji is the
agent's call — add icons where they aid scanning, omit them where they
clutter. Consistency rule: within one dimension, either ALL labels carry
an emoji or NONE do — never a mixed half-emoji dimension (e.g. don't ship
🐛 bug next to a plain enhancement).
Every dimension is opt-in except Type. Add a dimension only if the repo actually needs it; skip it otherwise. The menu below mirrors OpenClaw's official label taxonomy (the richest open reference) — cover every dimension that applies, but never force one the repo doesn't use.
Priority uses P0–P3 (OpenClaw's convention — P0 = emergency).
Examples in the tables below show the optional emoji style — apply them
all or none per dimension (baseline ships plain P0–P3):
| Label | Meaning | Color |
|---|---|---|
| 🔴 P0 | Emergency: data loss, security bypass, crash loop, unusable core | b60205 |
| 🟠 P1 | High: blocks planned work, needs attention soon | d93f0b |
| 🟡 P2 | Medium: normal priority | fbca04 |
| 🟢 P3 | Low: nice to have | 1a7f37 |
Dimension menu (write each label in the user's chosen language):
| Dimension | Labels (examples) | Add when |
|---|---|---|
| Type (always) | 🐛 bug ✨ enhancement 📚 documentation ❓ question 🙋 help wanted 🌱 good first issue | always |
| Priority | 🔴 P0 🟠 P1 🟡 P2 🟢 P3 | recommended |
| Status | 🚧 in progress 🧱 blocked ✅ ready to merge 🎉 merged 🚫 wontfix | recommended |
| Impact | impact: security impact: data-loss impact: availability … | recommended; required for security-sensitive repos |
| Rating (PR quality) | rating: 🦞 diamond lobster … themed tiers | PR-quality gate exists |
| Issue rating | issue-rating: 🦞 diamond lobster … | issue-quality gate exists (may fold into Rating) |
| Merge risk | merge-risk: 🚨 security-boundary merge-risk: 🚨 availability … | maintainer review process exists |
| Size | size: XS size: S size: M size: L size: XL | large repo / team estimation |
| Area / module | area: core area: api area: cli … | multi-module project |
| Bug detail | bug: behavior bug: crash | crash-prone / many bug reports |
| Governance / auto-close rules | r: spam r: support r: no-ci-pr … clawsweeper:* triage:* | automation bot enforces close/lock/review rules |
| Close reason | close: duplicate close: superseded close: invalid … | close-automation bot exists |
| Triage | triage: bug triage: blocked triage: needs-review … | triage workflow exists |
| Proof | proof: 🎥 video proof: 📸 screenshot | reproduction evidence required |
| Dependencies | 📦 dependencies | dependabot / dependency PRs |
| Security | 🔒 security | security-sensitive repo |
| Regression | ↩️ regression | stable project (was-working-now-fails) |
| Stale | 🕰️ stale 🚫 no-stale | stale automation exists |
| Team | team: <group> | explicit division of labor |
| Duplicate / invalid | 👯 duplicate 🚫 invalid | active public repo with many issues |
| Channel | channel: discord channel: telegram … | multi-channel product (OpenClaw-style) |
| App / platform | app: ios app: android app: web-ui … | multi-platform app |
| Extensions / plugins | extensions: <name> plugin: <name> | plugin/extension ecosystem |
Governance rules (r: / bot labels) — gated by Preflight step 6. Only
consider this dimension if the user answered "yes" to automation bots / AI
writers; skip it entirely otherwise. Auto-close and bot-state labels are
signal labels, not categories — a bot (or Actions workflow) reads them and
acts (auto-close, auto-lock, auto-fix, auto-merge). They are useless without
the matching automation, so skip them unless a governance bot actually runs
on the repo. If one does, add only the r:* rules matching the project's real
off-topic / reject criteria (e.g. r: spam, r: support, r: no-ci-pr) plus
the bot's own state labels (clawsweeper:*, triage:*, close:*). Never copy
OpenClaw's set verbatim — its rules encode OpenClaw's specific product
boundaries.
Impact dimension — the security "blast radius" judgement (generalized from OpenClaw; trim to the repo's actual failure modes):
| Label | Meaning |
|---|---|
| impact: security | security boundary, credentials, authz, sandbox, sensitive data |
| impact: data-loss | loses/corrupts/drops user, session, or config data |
| impact: availability | crash, hang, restart loop, or process outage |
| impact: auth-provider | auth / routing / model choice / secret resolution breaks |
| impact: session-state | session / memory / state drifts or corrupts (stateful systems) |
| impact: message-loss | messages/events lost, duplicated, or misrouted (messaging systems) |
| impact: ux-blocker | user blocked with no terminal/logs/support (GUI products) |
| impact: ux-friction | confusing flow / support burden (GUI products) |
| impact: other | meaningful impact outside the owned taxonomy |
Step 3 — Color rules (mandatory):
ready to merge / merged / done
→ greens (never gray or red); wontfix → gray; in progress → blue.
Everything else: pick colors that look good together and match the label's
meaning loosely — but prefer variety over strict one-meaning-one-color.rating:* / issue-rating:* label needs a clear low→high emoji gradient
(e.g. rating: 🦞 diamond lobster). Everywhere else, emoji is the agent's
call: use icons where they aid scanning, omit them where they clutter.
Consistency: within one dimension, all labels carry an emoji or none
do — never a mixed half-emoji dimension. If used, the emoji must match
the label's meaning, never decorative-only.LABELS.md (Step 4) describing each label's meaning and the explicit
low→high order, so the ranking is unambiguous.Step 4 — Rating-label docs (only if rating labels exist). Generate
LABELS.md from templates/LABELS.md (or extend an existing docs file):
list every rating label with its meaning and the explicit low→high order,
plus the rest of the taxonomy. Commit and push it together with the labels.
Step 5 — Idempotent upsert. GitHub has no PUT /labels/{name}
endpoint. Upsert = check existence (GET /labels/{name}), then
POST /labels (create) or PATCH /labels/{name} (update). Works for both
map-form and array-form labels.json:
R="repos/OWNER/REPO"
jq -c 'if type == "array" then .[] else to_entries[] | {name: .key} + .value end' templates/labels.json | while read -r l; do
name=$(echo "$l" | jq -r .name); color=$(echo "$l" | jq -r .color); desc=$(echo "$l" | jq -r .description)
enc=$(python3 -c "import urllib.parse,sys;print(urllib.parse.quote(sys.argv[1]))" "$name")
if gh api "$R/labels/$enc" >/dev/null 2>&1; then
gh api -X PATCH "$R/labels/$enc" -f name="$name" -f color="$color" -f description="$desc" --silent && echo "label updated: $name"
else
gh api -X POST "$R/labels" -f name="$name" -f color="$color" -f description="$desc" --silent && echo "label created: $name"
fi
done
Create .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/ with config.yml plus one YAML form per
template (bug / feature / question). Push via a commit:
config.yml (OWNER/REPO in the
Discussions / Security contact URLs) — see Template placeholders.title: prefix
and labels: values stay as-is (they must match the label taxonomy).mkdir -p .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE
cp templates/issue-form-*.yml templates/config.yml .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/
git add .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE && git commit -m "chore: add issue forms" && git push
gh repo clone OWNER/REPO), edit, push.mkdir -p .github
cp templates/PR_TEMPLATE.md .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md
git add .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md && git commit -m "chore: add PR template" && git push
Pick the workflow from the framework detection (templates/ci-*.yml —
they trigger on $default-branch, so they work for any default branch
name). Write to .github/workflows/ci.yml, commit, push. Keep existing
workflows; only add ci.yml if none exists.
Node projects: ci-node.yml installs dependencies lockfile-aware
(npm ci / pnpm install --frozen-lockfile / yarn install --frozen-lockfile, with plain npm install as fallback) — no manual
adjustment needed for pnpm / yarn repos.
Note: pushing workflow files requires a token with the workflow scope; if
the push is rejected with 403, tell the user their token lacks workflow.
Prefer rulesets (modern) over legacy branch protection:
# list existing
gh api repos/OWNER/REPO/rulesets -q '.[].name'
# create (example: protect default branch)
gh api -X POST repos/OWNER/REPO/rulesets --input - <<'EOF'
{
"name": "protect-default-branch",
"target": "branch",
"enforcement": "active",
"conditions": {
"ref_name": {"include": ["refs/heads/DEFAULT_BRANCH"], "exclude": []}
},
"rules": [
{"type": "pull_request", "parameters": {"required_approving_review_count": 1, "dismiss_stale_reviews_on_push": true, "require_code_owner_review": false, "require_last_push_approval": true, "required_review_thread_resolution": true}},
{"type": "required_linear_history"},
{"type": "deletion"},
{"type": "non_fast_forward"},
{"type": "required_signatures"}
]
}
EOF
PUT repos/OWNER/REPO/rulesets/{id} — full replace, include the complete
body (name, enforcement, conditions, rules, bypass_actors). There is no PATCH
for rulesets (PATCH returns 404)."bypass_actors": [{"actor_id": 5, "actor_type": "RepositoryRole", "bypass_mode": "always"}] (id 5 = admin)
so maintainers can push directly to the protected branch; non-admins still
go through pull requests.pull_request parameters are all required in current API versions:
required_approving_review_count, dismiss_stale_reviews_on_push,
require_code_owner_review, require_last_push_approval,
required_review_thread_resolution. Omitting any → HTTP 422.target: "branch" + ref_name.include: refs/heads/<default>; also offer
"tag" rules if tags matter./orgs/{org}/rulesets).README (ask about languages FIRST):
programmingHLS/ccmm):
README.md (usually English).README.<lang>.md (e.g. README.zh.md, README.ja.md).README.md: < English | 简体中文 > (简体中文 links to README.zh.md)README.zh.md: < English | 简体中文 > (English links to README.md)README.md: if missing or bare, generate one from templates/README.md
(badges, install, usage, modules table). Keep the user's existing content if
it is already substantive — only append a badges block. Replace
placeholders (badge URLs, clone URL, owner credit) per Template
placeholders.CONTRIBUTING.md, SECURITY.md, CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md: copy from
templates if missing (write CONTRIBUTING.md in the user-chosen language
from Preflight step 5; replace OWNER/REPO in SECURITY.md's
advisory link per Template placeholders).VISION.md: optional direction doc (modeled on OpenClaw's VISION.md) —
generate a short vision from templates/VISION.md (origin, guiding
principles, current state, direction, contribution rules) if the user
wants one (replace PROJECT_NAME per Template placeholders).THIRD_PARTY_NOTICES.md: add when the project adapts third-party content
(licenses, fonts, code of conduct) — list each source and its license.docs/ARCHITECTURE.md: for non-trivial projects, generate a short
architecture doc (structure, flow, constraints) from the audit.LICENSE: ask the user which license (default MIT) before creating.CHANGELOG.md: create from templates/CHANGELOG.md (Keep a Changelog
format) if missing; log notable changes per release (replace
YYYY-MM-DD in the placeholder date line per Template placeholders).CLAUDE.md (guidance for Claude Code) and an AGENTS.md (guidance
for any AI coding agent) when missing — see templates/CLAUDE.md and
templates/AGENTS.md (replace OWNER/REPO and the i18n placeholder
per Template placeholders).gh label list --repo OWNER/REPO --limit 200 | wc -l
gh api repos/OWNER/REPO/contents/.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE -q '.[].name' 2>/dev/null
gh api repos/OWNER/REPO/contents/.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md -q .name 2>/dev/null
gh api repos/OWNER/REPO/contents/.github/workflows/ci.yml -q .name 2>/dev/null
gh api repos/OWNER/REPO/rulesets -q '.[] | {name:.name, enforcement:.enforcement}'
Report a final table: module | status (applied/skipped/failed) | note.
Templates stay generic — OWNER/REPO, OWNER_USERNAME, PROJECT_NAME,
YYYY-MM-DD are placeholders the agent fills in when copying a template
into the target repo. Unreplaced placeholders ship broken links (badges,
clone URL, discussions, security advisory, CODEOWNERS handle) into the
user's repo.
| Placeholder | Replace with |
|---|---|
| OWNER | target repo owner login (user or org) |
| REPO | target repo name |
| OWNER_USERNAME | owner's default reviewer / team handle |
| PROJECT_NAME | project display name |
| YYYY-MM-DD | current date |
Resolve the values once up front, then substitute in every copied file
(config.yml, README*.md, SECURITY.md, CODEOWNERS, AGENTS.md /
CLAUDE.md, VISION.md, …):
O=OWNER R=REPO N=PROJECT_NAME D=$(date +%F)
sed -i "s|OWNER_USERNAME|$O|g; s|OWNER/REPO|$O/$R|g; s|PROJECT_NAME|$N|g; s|YYYY-MM-DD|$D|g" \
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/config.yml README.md SECURITY.md .github/CODEOWNERS AGENTS.md
OWNER_USERNAME before OWNER/REPO — the former contains the
OWNER prefix, so order matters with naive sed.config.yml, README*.md, SECURITY.md, CODEOWNERS, AGENTS.md /
CLAUDE.md, VISION.md, CHANGELOG.md carry placeholders; the issue
forms, PR template, CI workflows, and CoC are placeholder-free.All templates live in templates/:
labels.json, LABELS.md, config.yml, issue-form-bug.yml,
issue-form-feature.yml, issue-form-question.yml, PR_TEMPLATE.md,
ci-node.yml, ci-python.yml, ci-go.yml, ci-rust.yml, CODEOWNERS,
CONTRIBUTING.md, SECURITY.md, CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md, CLAUDE.md,
AGENTS.md, VISION.md, CHANGELOG.md, templates/README.md,
templates/README.zh.md.
development
Anxiety-aware, evidence-driven collaboration for stalled or high-stakes work when a user says uncertainty, repeated setbacks, or lack of visible progress is causing significant anxiety or distress. Use immediately when explicitly invoked; when this fit is only inferred from the user's own account, ask permission before applying it. Preserve the user's ideal and turn grounded perspective-taking into persistent, bounded problem solving. Do not use to diagnose, provide therapy, manufacture certainty, or lower goals for reassurance.
development
Build, review, debug, package, and test Roslyn diagnostic analyzers, code fix providers, and incremental source generators. Use for DiagnosticAnalyzer, CodeFixProvider, IIncrementalGenerator, IOperation analysis, Microsoft.CodeAnalysis dependency pinning, Roslyn test harnesses, C#/VB tests, and analyzer NuGet packaging.
testing
Migrates a project that uses checked-in .designer.cs files behind .resx to using a source-generator instead
development
Mistake-proof code so misuse cannot be expressed, rather than warning against it. Use when designing an interface, schema, or state machine and the user wants it hard to get wrong ("make invalid states unrepresentable", "so callers cannot screw it up", "type-safe API", "pit of success"); when auditing existing code for footguns ("what could bite us here", "what is easy to misuse", "poka-yoke this repo", "review this diff for ways to get it wrong"); or when a bug has recurred and the fix must close the class rather than the case ("make sure this never happens again", "this is the third time"). Especially for money, auth, permissions, deletion, migrations, and pipelines where failure is silent. Classifies every finding by what happens when the mistake occurs and how the device notices, which is what keeps it from collapsing into generic code review.