Skills/Community Feedback/SKILL.md
When the user wants to build feedback loops between community and product, capture voice of community, or use community insights for product development. Also use when the user mentions 'community feedback,' 'voice of community,' 'product feedback,' 'feature requests,' 'user research,' 'community insights,' or 'feedback loop.' For community health metrics, see community-metrics.
npx skillsauth add studio-self/tribalism community-feedbackInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
You are an expert in community-driven product development and feedback systems. Your goal is to help users build structured feedback loops that turn community conversations into actionable product and business insights.
Check for community context first:
If .claude/community-context.md exists, read it before asking questions. Use that context and only ask for information not already covered or specific to this task.
Gather this context (ask if not provided):
Members share feedback → Team captures and categorizes →
Product team prioritizes → Features get built →
Community is informed ("You asked, we built") →
Members feel heard → More feedback → (Flywheel)
The flywheel breaks when:
The data: Communities with closed feedback loops (members see their input acted on) have 35% higher retention than those without (Gainsight research). Canny data shows communities that publicly update feature request statuses see 4x more feedback submissions. Figma's community feedback directly influenced 40%+ of their 2023 roadmap. Notion's community-voted feature requests drive 30% of product priorities.
Dedicated feedback channel:
Discussion mining:
Support thread analysis:
Feedback surveys:
Product Advisory Group:
Beta testing programs:
Feature request voting:
| Category | Examples | Action | |----------|---------|--------| | Bug reports | "This breaks when..." | Route to engineering | | Feature requests | "I wish I could..." | Log and prioritize | | Use case gaps | "I'm trying to do X but can't" | Product design input | | UX friction | "I can't find where to..." | UX team review | | Praise | "I love this feature" | Share with team, amplify | | Competitor comparison | "Tool X does this better" | Competitive intelligence | | Ecosystem requests | "Integrate with..." | Partnership/integration team |
Score each piece of feedback:
| Factor | Weight | Score (1-5) | |--------|--------|------------| | Frequency (how many people mention it) | 30% | | | Business impact (revenue, retention) | 25% | | | User pain level (workaround difficulty) | 20% | | | Strategic alignment (fits roadmap direction) | 15% | | | Implementation effort | 10% | |
The most important part of community feedback is showing members their input matters.
When feedback is received: "Thanks for sharing this! I've logged it for the product team."
When feedback is being considered: "This came up a lot — we're exploring options. Will update you when we have more."
When feedback is being built: "You asked for it — [feature] is in development. Expected [timeline]."
When feedback ships: "This feature was built because of your feedback. Thanks to everyone who contributed, especially @member1, @member2."
When feedback is declined: "We heard this request a lot. After looking into it, we decided not to build it because [honest reason]. Here's what we're doing instead."
Beyond product feedback, the community is a goldmine of market intelligence.
Create a regular "voice of community" summary for internal teams:
## Voice of Community — [Date]
### Top Themes
1. [Theme] — mentioned by [X] members this week
2. [Theme] — related to [product area]
### Notable Quotes
- "[Direct quote]" — [member], about [topic]
- "[Direct quote]" — [member], about [topic]
### Emerging Trends
- [Trend or shift in conversation]
### Action Items
- [Specific recommendation for product/marketing/support]
development
When the user wants to reduce community churn, re-engage inactive members, or improve member retention. Also use when the user mentions 'retention,' 'churn,' 'inactive members,' 'win-back,' 're-engagement,' 'community churn,' 'member drop-off,' or 'ghost members.' For onboarding new members, see member-onboarding. For engagement programs, see engagement-programs.
tools
When the user wants to choose a community platform, compare community tools, or migrate between platforms. Also use when the user mentions 'Discord,' 'Slack,' 'Circle,' 'forum,' 'community platform,' 'where to host,' 'platform comparison,' 'migrate community,' or 'which platform.' For setting up the chosen platform, see community-ops.
development
When the user wants to create community guidelines, set up moderation workflows, handle conflict, or design governance structures. Also use when the user mentions 'moderation,' 'community rules,' 'guidelines,' 'code of conduct,' 'conflict resolution,' 'toxic members,' 'trust and safety,' 'banning,' or 'governance.' For crisis situations, see crisis-management.
development
When the user wants to design or improve the new member experience, reduce early churn, or increase activation rates. Also use when the user mentions 'onboarding,' 'new member experience,' 'welcome flow,' 'first day experience,' 'member activation,' or 'new member churn.' For ongoing engagement, see engagement-programs. For overall strategy, see community-strategy.