external/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills/skills/performing-timeline-reconstruction-with-plaso/SKILL.md
Build comprehensive forensic super-timelines using Plaso (log2timeline) to correlate events across file systems, logs, and artifacts into a unified chronological view.
npx skillsauth add seikaikyo/dash-skills performing-timeline-reconstruction-with-plasoInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
# Install Plaso on Ubuntu/Debian
sudo add-apt-repository ppa:gift/stable
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get install plaso-tools
# Or install via pip
pip install plaso
# Or use Docker (recommended for dependency isolation)
docker pull log2timeline/plaso
# Verify installation
log2timeline.py --version
psort.py --version
# Create output directory
mkdir -p /cases/case-2024-001/timeline/
# Verify the forensic image
img_stat /cases/case-2024-001/images/evidence.dd
# Basic processing of a disk image (all parsers)
log2timeline.py \
--storage-file /cases/case-2024-001/timeline/evidence.plaso \
/cases/case-2024-001/images/evidence.dd
# Process with specific parsers for faster targeted analysis
log2timeline.py \
--parsers "winevtx,prefetch,mft,usnjrnl,lnk,recycle_bin,chrome_history,firefox_history,winreg" \
--storage-file /cases/case-2024-001/timeline/evidence.plaso \
/cases/case-2024-001/images/evidence.dd
# Process with a filter file to focus on specific paths
cat << 'EOF' > /cases/case-2024-001/timeline/filter.txt
/Windows/System32/winevt/Logs
/Windows/Prefetch
/Users/*/NTUSER.DAT
/Users/*/AppData/Local/Google/Chrome
/Users/*/AppData/Roaming/Mozilla/Firefox
/$MFT
/$UsnJrnl:$J
/Windows/System32/config
EOF
log2timeline.py \
--filter-file /cases/case-2024-001/timeline/filter.txt \
--storage-file /cases/case-2024-001/timeline/evidence.plaso \
/cases/case-2024-001/images/evidence.dd
# Using Docker
docker run --rm -v /cases:/cases log2timeline/plaso log2timeline \
--storage-file /cases/case-2024-001/timeline/evidence.plaso \
/cases/case-2024-001/images/evidence.dd
# Process multiple evidence sources into one timeline
log2timeline.py \
--storage-file /cases/case-2024-001/timeline/combined.plaso \
/cases/case-2024-001/images/workstation.dd
log2timeline.py \
--storage-file /cases/case-2024-001/timeline/combined.plaso \
/cases/case-2024-001/images/server.dd
# Export full timeline to CSV (super-timeline format)
psort.py \
-o l2tcsv \
-w /cases/case-2024-001/timeline/full_timeline.csv \
/cases/case-2024-001/timeline/evidence.plaso
# Export with date range filter (focus on incident window)
psort.py \
-o l2tcsv \
-w /cases/case-2024-001/timeline/incident_window.csv \
/cases/case-2024-001/timeline/evidence.plaso \
"date > '2024-01-15 00:00:00' AND date < '2024-01-20 23:59:59'"
# Export in JSON Lines format (for ingestion into SIEM/Timesketch)
psort.py \
-o json_line \
-w /cases/case-2024-001/timeline/timeline.jsonl \
/cases/case-2024-001/timeline/evidence.plaso
# Export with specific source type filters
psort.py \
-o l2tcsv \
-w /cases/case-2024-001/timeline/registry_events.csv \
/cases/case-2024-001/timeline/evidence.plaso \
"source_short == 'REG'"
psort.py \
-o l2tcsv \
-w /cases/case-2024-001/timeline/evtx_events.csv \
/cases/case-2024-001/timeline/evidence.plaso \
"source_short == 'EVT'"
# Export for Timeline Explorer (dynamic CSV)
psort.py \
-o dynamic \
-w /cases/case-2024-001/timeline/timeline_explorer.csv \
/cases/case-2024-001/timeline/evidence.plaso
# Install Timesketch (Docker deployment)
git clone https://github.com/google/timesketch.git
cd timesketch
docker compose up -d
# Import Plaso file into Timesketch via CLI
timesketch_importer \
--host http://localhost:5000 \
--username analyst \
--password password \
--sketch_id 1 \
--timeline_name "Case 2024-001 Workstation" \
/cases/case-2024-001/timeline/evidence.plaso
# Alternatively, import JSONL
timesketch_importer \
--host http://localhost:5000 \
--username analyst \
--sketch_id 1 \
--timeline_name "Case 2024-001" \
/cases/case-2024-001/timeline/timeline.jsonl
# In Timesketch web UI:
# 1. Search for events: "data_type:windows:evtx:record AND event_identifier:4624"
# 2. Apply Sigma analyzers for automated detection
# 3. Star/tag important events
# 4. Create stories documenting the investigation narrative
# 5. Share with team members
# Analyze specific time periods around known events
python3 << 'PYEOF'
import csv
from collections import defaultdict
from datetime import datetime
# Load incident window timeline
events_by_hour = defaultdict(list)
source_counts = defaultdict(int)
with open('/cases/case-2024-001/timeline/incident_window.csv', 'r', errors='ignore') as f:
reader = csv.DictReader(f)
total = 0
for row in reader:
total += 1
timestamp = row.get('datetime', row.get('date', ''))
source = row.get('source_short', row.get('source', 'Unknown'))
description = row.get('message', row.get('desc', ''))
source_counts[source] += 1
# Group by hour for activity patterns
try:
dt = datetime.strptime(timestamp[:19], '%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S')
hour_key = dt.strftime('%Y-%m-%d %H:00')
events_by_hour[hour_key].append({
'time': timestamp,
'source': source,
'description': description[:200]
})
except (ValueError, TypeError):
pass
print(f"Total events in incident window: {total}\n")
print("=== EVENTS BY SOURCE TYPE ===")
for source, count in sorted(source_counts.items(), key=lambda x: x[1], reverse=True):
print(f" {source}: {count}")
print("\n=== ACTIVITY BY HOUR ===")
for hour in sorted(events_by_hour.keys()):
count = len(events_by_hour[hour])
bar = '#' * min(count // 10, 50)
print(f" {hour}: {count:>6} events {bar}")
# Find hours with unusual activity spikes
avg = total / max(len(events_by_hour), 1)
print(f"\n=== ANOMALOUS HOURS (>{avg*3:.0f} events) ===")
for hour in sorted(events_by_hour.keys()):
if len(events_by_hour[hour]) > avg * 3:
print(f" {hour}: {len(events_by_hour[hour])} events (SPIKE)")
PYEOF
| Concept | Description | |---------|-------------| | Super-timeline | Unified chronological view combining all artifact timestamps from multiple sources | | MACB timestamps | Modified, Accessed, Changed (metadata), Born (created) - four key file timestamp types | | Plaso storage file | SQLite-based intermediate format storing parsed events before export | | L2T CSV | Log2timeline CSV format with standardized columns for timeline events | | Parser | Plaso module extracting timestamps from a specific artifact type (e.g., winevtx, prefetch) | | Psort | Plaso sorting and filtering tool for post-processing storage files | | Timesketch | Google open-source collaborative timeline analysis platform | | Pivot points | Known timestamps (e.g., malware execution) used to focus investigation scope |
| Tool | Purpose | |------|---------| | log2timeline (Plaso) | Primary timeline generation engine parsing 100+ artifact types | | psort | Plaso output filtering, sorting, and export utility | | Timesketch | Web-based collaborative forensic timeline analysis platform | | Timeline Explorer | Eric Zimmerman's Windows GUI for CSV timeline analysis | | KAPE | Automated triage collection feeding into Plaso processing | | mactime (TSK) | Simpler timeline generation from Sleuth Kit bodyfiles | | Excel/Sheets | Manual timeline review for small filtered datasets | | Elastic/Kibana | Alternative visualization platform for JSONL timeline data |
Scenario 1: Ransomware Attack Reconstruction Process the full disk image with Plaso, filter to the week before encryption was discovered, identify the initial access vector from browser history and event logs, trace privilege escalation through registry and Prefetch, map lateral movement from network logon events, pinpoint encryption start from MFT timestamps showing mass file modifications.
Scenario 2: Data Theft Investigation Create super-timeline from suspect's workstation, filter for USB device connection events, file access timestamps, and cloud storage browser activity, build a narrative showing data staging, compression, and exfiltration, present timeline to legal team with tagged evidence points.
Scenario 3: Multi-System Breach Analysis Process disk images from all affected systems into a single Plaso storage file, import into Timesketch for collaborative analysis, search for lateral movement patterns across system timelines, identify the patient-zero system and initial compromise vector, map the full attack chain across the environment.
Scenario 4: Insider Threat After-Hours Activity Filter timeline to non-business hours only, identify file access patterns outside normal working times, correlate with authentication events (badge access, VPN logon), search for data access to sensitive directories during these periods, build evidence package for HR/legal.
Timeline Reconstruction Summary:
Evidence Sources:
Disk Image: evidence.dd (500 GB, NTFS)
Plaso Storage: evidence.plaso (2.3 GB)
Processing Statistics:
Total events extracted: 4,567,890
Parsers used: 45 (winevtx, prefetch, mft, usnjrnl, lnk, chrome, firefox, winreg, ...)
Processing time: 3h 45m
Incident Window (2024-01-15 to 2024-01-20):
Events in window: 234,567
Event Sources:
MFT: 89,234
Event Logs: 45,678
USN Journal: 56,789
Registry: 23,456
Prefetch: 1,234
Browser: 5,678
LNK Files: 2,345
Other: 10,153
Key Timeline Events:
2024-01-15 14:32 - Phishing email opened (browser)
2024-01-15 14:33 - Malicious document downloaded
2024-01-15 14:35 - PowerShell executed (Prefetch + Event Log)
2024-01-15 14:36 - C2 connection established (Registry + Event Log)
2024-01-16 02:30 - Mimikatz execution (Prefetch)
2024-01-16 02:45 - Lateral movement to DC (Event Log)
2024-01-17 03:00 - Data exfiltration (MFT + USN Journal)
2024-01-18 03:00 - Log clearing (Event Log)
Exported Files:
Full Timeline: /timeline/full_timeline.csv (4.5M rows)
Incident Window: /timeline/incident_window.csv (234K rows)
Timesketch Import: /timeline/timeline.jsonl
development
拋棄式 HTML mockup 比稿:產出 2 到 3 個設計立場不同的變體(密度 / 版式 / 強調軸,不是換色),各附取捨說明,最後給有立場的對比結論。適用:「畫個草圖」「比較 A 版 B 版」「先看方向再做」「給我看幾種做法」。要 production 元件或設計已定案時不適用。
tools
需求不明時的意圖萃取訪談:一次一題、每題附上自己的猜測、聽出「真正想要 vs 覺得應該要」,直到能預測使用者反應(約 95% 信心)才動工。適用:需求缺少對象 / 動機 / 成功標準 / 約束,或使用者點名「訪談我」「先確認一下」「我們確定嗎」。明確自足的指示、純資訊查詢、機械性操作不適用。
development
對非平凡決策啟動新鮮 context 對抗審查(找碴不背書),在修正還便宜的時候抓出錯誤方向。適用:高風險改動(production、資安敏感邏輯、不可逆操作)、不熟的程式碼、要宣稱「這樣是安全的 / 可行的」之前。機械性操作與一行修改不適用。
testing
Reference for writing and editing agent skills well — the vocabulary and principles that make a skill predictable. Consult when authoring, reviewing, or pruning a SKILL.md.