external/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills/skills/performing-soc2-type2-audit-preparation/SKILL.md
Automates SOC 2 Type II audit preparation including gap assessment against AICPA Trust Services Criteria (CC1-CC9), evidence collection from cloud providers and identity systems, control testing validation, remediation tracking, and continuous compliance monitoring. Covers all five TSC categories (Security, Availability, Processing Integrity, Confidentiality, Privacy) with automated evidence gathering from AWS, Azure, GCP, Okta, GitHub, and Jira. Use when preparing for or maintaining SOC 2 Type II certification.
npx skillsauth add seikaikyo/dash-skills performing-soc2-type2-audit-preparationInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
boto3, requests, pyyaml dependenciesSOC 2 is built on five Trust Services Categories defined by AICPA. Security (Common Criteria CC1-CC9) is mandatory; the others are selected based on business relevance:
| Category | Criteria | Focus | |----------|----------|-------| | Security (mandatory) | CC1-CC9 | Control environment, risk, access, operations, change management | | Availability | A1 | System uptime and disaster recovery | | Processing Integrity | PI1 | Accurate and complete data processing | | Confidentiality | C1 | Protection of confidential information | | Privacy | P1-P8 | Personal information lifecycle |
CC1 - Control Environment: Board oversight, management structure, integrity and ethical values, HR policies, accountability.
CC2 - Communication and Information: Internal/external communication of security policies, system boundaries, roles, and responsibilities.
CC3 - Risk Assessment: Risk identification, fraud risk analysis, change impact assessment, risk tolerance definition.
CC4 - Monitoring Activities: Ongoing control evaluations, deficiency identification, remediation tracking, internal audit.
CC5 - Control Activities: Policy-to-procedure mapping, technology controls, deployment of controls across the entity.
CC6 - Logical and Physical Access Controls: Authentication, authorization, access provisioning/deprovisioning, physical security, encryption.
CC7 - System Operations: Anomaly detection, incident response, vulnerability management, change detection, event monitoring.
CC8 - Change Management: Change authorization, testing, approval workflows, emergency changes, rollback procedures.
CC9 - Risk Mitigation: Vendor risk management, business continuity, insurance, residual risk acceptance.
Before the audit period begins, perform a readiness assessment 8-12 weeks in advance:
# Define control matrix against CC criteria
gap_assessment = {
"CC1": {
"CC1.1": {
"criteria": "COSO Principle 1: Demonstrates commitment to integrity",
"control": "Code of conduct signed annually by all employees",
"evidence": "Signed acknowledgments in HR system",
"status": "implemented",
"gap": None,
},
"CC1.2": {
"criteria": "COSO Principle 2: Board exercises oversight",
"control": "Quarterly board security reviews",
"evidence": "Board meeting minutes with security agenda items",
"status": "partial",
"gap": "No documented security committee charter",
},
},
}
Collect evidence continuously throughout the audit period from integrated systems:
import boto3
# CC6 Evidence: AWS IAM access controls
iam = boto3.client("iam")
# Collect MFA status for all IAM users
users = iam.list_users()["Users"]
mfa_evidence = []
for user in users:
mfa_devices = iam.list_mfa_devices(UserName=user["UserName"])
mfa_evidence.append({
"user": user["UserName"],
"mfa_enabled": len(mfa_devices["MFADevices"]) > 0,
"created": user["CreateDate"].isoformat(),
})
# CC7 Evidence: AWS CloudTrail logging status
cloudtrail = boto3.client("cloudtrail")
trails = cloudtrail.describe_trails()["trailList"]
logging_evidence = []
for trail in trails:
status = cloudtrail.get_trail_status(Name=trail["TrailARN"])
logging_evidence.append({
"trail": trail["Name"],
"is_logging": status["IsLogging"],
"multi_region": trail.get("IsMultiRegionTrail", False),
"log_validation": trail.get("LogFileValidationEnabled", False),
})
For Type II audits, demonstrate controls operated effectively over the entire audit period:
import requests
# CC8 Evidence: Change management - verify all production changes
# had tickets, approvals, and testing before deployment
headers = {"Authorization": f"token {github_token}"}
prs = requests.get(
"https://api.github.com/repos/org/repo/pulls",
params={"state": "closed", "base": "main", "per_page": 100},
headers=headers,
).json()
change_evidence = []
for pr in prs:
if not pr.get("merged_at"):
continue
reviews = requests.get(pr["url"] + "/reviews", headers=headers).json()
approved = any(r["state"] == "APPROVED" for r in reviews)
change_evidence.append({
"pr_number": pr["number"],
"title": pr["title"],
"merged_at": pr["merged_at"],
"approved": approved,
})
# Flag PRs merged without approval (control exception)
exceptions = [c for c in change_evidence if not c["approved"]]
Set up automated checks that run daily to detect control drift:
# Daily compliance check - run via cron or Lambda
checks = [
{"control": "CC6.1", "check": "All IAM users have MFA enabled"},
{"control": "CC6.6", "check": "No public S3 buckets"},
{"control": "CC7.1", "check": "CloudTrail logging enabled"},
{"control": "CC7.2", "check": "GuardDuty findings under threshold"},
{"control": "CC8.1", "check": "All PRs have required reviews"},
]
for check in checks:
result = run_compliance_check(check["control"])
if not result["passing"]:
send_alert(
channel="#compliance",
message=f"Control drift: {check['control']} - {check['check']}",
details=result["findings"],
)
Organize collected evidence into structured packages per criteria:
evidence_package = {
"audit_period": {"start": "2025-04-01", "end": "2026-03-31"},
"criteria_packages": {
"CC1_Control_Environment": {
"CC1.1": ["signed_acknowledgments.csv"],
"CC1.2": ["board_minutes_q1.pdf", "board_minutes_q2.pdf"],
},
"CC6_Logical_Physical_Access": {
"CC6.1": ["okta_mfa_policy.json", "iam_users_mfa_status.csv"],
"CC6.2": ["access_review_q1.csv", "access_review_q2.csv"],
"CC6.3": ["offboarding_tickets.csv", "terminated_user_audit.csv"],
},
"CC7_System_Operations": {
"CC7.1": ["cloudtrail_config.json", "siem_dashboard.png"],
"CC7.2": ["guardduty_findings_summary.csv"],
"CC7.3": ["vulnerability_scan_reports/"],
},
"CC8_Change_Management": {
"CC8.1": ["merged_prs_with_approvals.csv"],
},
},
}
import boto3
from datetime import datetime, timedelta
iam = boto3.client("iam")
# Find users with no activity in 90 days
inactive_threshold = datetime.utcnow() - timedelta(days=90)
report = iam.get_credential_report()["Content"].decode()
inactive_users = []
for line in report.strip().split("\n")[1:]:
fields = line.split(",")
username = fields[0]
last_used = fields[4]
if last_used not in ("N/A", "no_information"):
last_date = datetime.strptime(last_used, "%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S+00:00")
if last_date < inactive_threshold:
inactive_users.append({"user": username, "last_active": last_used})
import requests
headers = {"Authorization": f"Bearer {scanner_token}"}
scans = requests.get(
"https://scanner.example.com/api/v1/scans",
params={"status": "completed", "since": "2025-04-01"},
headers=headers,
).json()
vuln_evidence = {"scan_count": len(scans), "critical_findings": 0, "high_findings": 0}
for scan in scans:
findings = requests.get(
f"https://scanner.example.com/api/v1/scans/{scan['id']}/findings",
headers=headers,
).json()
vuln_evidence["critical_findings"] += len([f for f in findings if f["severity"] == "critical"])
vuln_evidence["high_findings"] += len([f for f in findings if f["severity"] == "high"])
incidents = requests.get(
"https://pagerduty.com/api/v1/incidents",
params={"since": "2025-04-01", "until": "2026-03-31"},
headers={"Authorization": f"Token token={pd_token}"},
).json()
ir_evidence = {
"total_incidents": len(incidents["incidents"]),
"incidents": [
{
"id": inc["id"],
"title": inc["title"],
"severity": inc["urgency"],
"created": inc["created_at"],
"resolved": inc.get("last_status_change_at"),
}
for inc in incidents["incidents"]
],
}
development
拋棄式 HTML mockup 比稿:產出 2 到 3 個設計立場不同的變體(密度 / 版式 / 強調軸,不是換色),各附取捨說明,最後給有立場的對比結論。適用:「畫個草圖」「比較 A 版 B 版」「先看方向再做」「給我看幾種做法」。要 production 元件或設計已定案時不適用。
tools
需求不明時的意圖萃取訪談:一次一題、每題附上自己的猜測、聽出「真正想要 vs 覺得應該要」,直到能預測使用者反應(約 95% 信心)才動工。適用:需求缺少對象 / 動機 / 成功標準 / 約束,或使用者點名「訪談我」「先確認一下」「我們確定嗎」。明確自足的指示、純資訊查詢、機械性操作不適用。
development
對非平凡決策啟動新鮮 context 對抗審查(找碴不背書),在修正還便宜的時候抓出錯誤方向。適用:高風險改動(production、資安敏感邏輯、不可逆操作)、不熟的程式碼、要宣稱「這樣是安全的 / 可行的」之前。機械性操作與一行修改不適用。
testing
Reference for writing and editing agent skills well — the vocabulary and principles that make a skill predictable. Consult when authoring, reviewing, or pruning a SKILL.md.