external/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills/skills/performing-privileged-account-access-review/SKILL.md
Conduct systematic reviews of privileged accounts to validate access rights, identify excessive permissions, and enforce least privilege across PAM infrastructure.
npx skillsauth add seikaikyo/dash-skills performing-privileged-account-access-reviewInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Privileged Account Access Review is a critical identity governance process that validates whether users with elevated permissions still require their access. This review covers domain admins, service accounts, database administrators, cloud IAM roles, and application-level privileged accounts. Regular access reviews are mandated by SOC 2, PCI DSS, HIPAA, and SOX compliance frameworks, typically required quarterly for high-privilege accounts.
| Category | Examples | Risk Level | Review Frequency | |----------|----------|------------|-----------------| | Domain Admins | Enterprise Admin, Domain Admin, Schema Admin | Critical | Monthly | | Service Accounts | SQL service, backup agents, monitoring agents | High | Quarterly | | Cloud IAM | AWS root, Azure Global Admin, GCP Owner | Critical | Monthly | | Database Admin | DBA accounts, sa/sys accounts | High | Quarterly | | Application Admin | App admin roles, API keys with admin scope | Medium | Semi-annually | | Emergency/Break-glass | Firecall accounts, emergency access | Critical | After each use |
DISCOVER VALIDATE REMEDIATE MONITOR
│ │ │ │
├─ Enumerate all ├─ Verify business ├─ Remove excess ├─ Continuous
│ privileged accounts │ justification │ privileges │ monitoring
│ │ │ │
├─ Identify orphaned ├─ Confirm account ├─ Disable orphaned ├─ Anomaly
│ accounts │ ownership │ accounts │ detection
│ │ │ │
├─ Map permissions to ├─ Check compliance ├─ Enforce password ├─ Session
│ business roles │ with policies │ rotation │ recording
│ │ │ │
└─ Classify by risk └─ Review last usage └─ Implement JIT └─ Audit
level and activity access logging
Enumerate all privileged accounts across the environment:
Active Directory:
Cloud Platforms:
iam:* permissionsDatabases:
Each privileged account must be evaluated against:
For each account, the designated reviewer must:
Decision matrix:
| Condition | Action | |-----------|--------| | Active user, justified privilege | Certify - maintain access | | Active user, excessive privilege | Remediate - reduce to least privilege | | Inactive > 90 days | Disable account, notify owner | | No owner identified | Disable account, escalate to security | | SoD conflict detected | Remediate - reassign or add compensating controls | | Break-glass account | Verify last use was authorized, reset credentials |
After reviews are completed:
Generate review reports including:
development
拋棄式 HTML mockup 比稿:產出 2 到 3 個設計立場不同的變體(密度 / 版式 / 強調軸,不是換色),各附取捨說明,最後給有立場的對比結論。適用:「畫個草圖」「比較 A 版 B 版」「先看方向再做」「給我看幾種做法」。要 production 元件或設計已定案時不適用。
tools
需求不明時的意圖萃取訪談:一次一題、每題附上自己的猜測、聽出「真正想要 vs 覺得應該要」,直到能預測使用者反應(約 95% 信心)才動工。適用:需求缺少對象 / 動機 / 成功標準 / 約束,或使用者點名「訪談我」「先確認一下」「我們確定嗎」。明確自足的指示、純資訊查詢、機械性操作不適用。
development
對非平凡決策啟動新鮮 context 對抗審查(找碴不背書),在修正還便宜的時候抓出錯誤方向。適用:高風險改動(production、資安敏感邏輯、不可逆操作)、不熟的程式碼、要宣稱「這樣是安全的 / 可行的」之前。機械性操作與一行修改不適用。
testing
Reference for writing and editing agent skills well — the vocabulary and principles that make a skill predictable. Consult when authoring, reviewing, or pruning a SKILL.md.