external/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills/skills/performing-nist-csf-maturity-assessment/SKILL.md
The NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0, released in February 2024, provides a comprehensive taxonomy for managing cybersecurity risk through six core Functions - Govern, Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, and Recover. This skill covers conducting a maturity assessment against the CSF using Implementation Tiers to measure organizational cybersecurity posture and create improvement roadmaps.
npx skillsauth add seikaikyo/dash-skills performing-nist-csf-maturity-assessmentInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
The NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0, released in February 2024, provides a comprehensive taxonomy for managing cybersecurity risk through six core Functions: Govern, Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, and Recover. This skill covers conducting a maturity assessment against the CSF, using the four Implementation Tiers (Partial, Risk-Informed, Repeatable, Adaptive) to measure organizational cybersecurity posture and create improvement roadmaps.
| Function | Code | Categories | Purpose | |----------|------|-----------|---------| | Govern | GV | 6 | Establish and monitor cybersecurity risk management strategy | | Identify | ID | 3 | Determine current cybersecurity risk to the organization | | Protect | PR | 5 | Implement safeguards to prevent or reduce risk | | Detect | DE | 2 | Find and analyze possible cybersecurity attacks | | Respond | RS | 4 | Take action regarding detected cybersecurity incidents | | Recover | RC | 2 | Restore capabilities impaired by cybersecurity incidents |
| Tier | Name | Description | |------|------|-------------| | Tier 1 | Partial | Ad hoc, reactive; limited awareness of cybersecurity risk | | Tier 2 | Risk-Informed | Risk-aware but not organization-wide; approved but may not be policy | | Tier 3 | Repeatable | Formal policies; consistently implemented; regularly updated | | Tier 4 | Adaptive | Continuous improvement; real-time risk response; lessons learned integrated |
development
拋棄式 HTML mockup 比稿:產出 2 到 3 個設計立場不同的變體(密度 / 版式 / 強調軸,不是換色),各附取捨說明,最後給有立場的對比結論。適用:「畫個草圖」「比較 A 版 B 版」「先看方向再做」「給我看幾種做法」。要 production 元件或設計已定案時不適用。
tools
需求不明時的意圖萃取訪談:一次一題、每題附上自己的猜測、聽出「真正想要 vs 覺得應該要」,直到能預測使用者反應(約 95% 信心)才動工。適用:需求缺少對象 / 動機 / 成功標準 / 約束,或使用者點名「訪談我」「先確認一下」「我們確定嗎」。明確自足的指示、純資訊查詢、機械性操作不適用。
development
對非平凡決策啟動新鮮 context 對抗審查(找碴不背書),在修正還便宜的時候抓出錯誤方向。適用:高風險改動(production、資安敏感邏輯、不可逆操作)、不熟的程式碼、要宣稱「這樣是安全的 / 可行的」之前。機械性操作與一行修改不適用。
testing
Reference for writing and editing agent skills well — the vocabulary and principles that make a skill predictable. Consult when authoring, reviewing, or pruning a SKILL.md.