external/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills/skills/implementing-llm-guardrails-for-security/SKILL.md
Implements input and output validation guardrails for LLM-powered applications to prevent prompt injection, data leakage, toxic content generation, and hallucinated outputs. Builds a security validation pipeline using NVIDIA NeMo Guardrails Colang definitions, custom Python validators for PII detection and content policy enforcement, and the Guardrails AI framework for structured output validation. The guardrails system intercepts both user inputs (blocking injection attempts, stripping PII, enforcing topic boundaries) and model outputs (detecting hallucinations, filtering toxic content, validating JSON schema compliance). Activates for requests involving LLM output validation, AI content filtering, guardrail implementation, or LLM safety enforcement.
npx skillsauth add seikaikyo/dash-skills implementing-llm-guardrails-for-securityInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Do not use as a replacement for proper authentication, authorization, and network security controls. Guardrails are a defense-in-depth layer, not a perimeter defense. Not suitable for real-time content moderation of user-to-user communication without LLM involvement.
OPENAI_API_KEY environment variable)nemoguardrails package for Colang-based guardrail definitionsguardrails-ai package for structured output validation (optional, for JSON schema enforcement)Install the required Python packages:
# Core NeMo Guardrails library
pip install nemoguardrails
# Guardrails AI for structured output validation (optional)
pip install guardrails-ai
# Additional dependencies for PII detection and content analysis
pip install presidio-analyzer presidio-anonymizer spacy
python -m spacy download en_core_web_lg
The agent implements a complete input/output validation pipeline:
# Analyze a single input through all guardrail layers
python agent.py --input "Tell me how to hack into a system"
# Analyze input with a custom content policy file
python agent.py --input "Some text" --policy policy.json
# Scan a file of prompts through the guardrail pipeline
python agent.py --file prompts.txt --mode full
# Input-only validation (no LLM call, just check if input is safe)
python agent.py --input "Some text" --mode input-only
# Output validation mode (validate a pre-generated LLM response)
python agent.py --input "User question" --response "LLM response to validate" --mode output-only
# PII detection and redaction mode
python agent.py --input "My SSN is 123-45-6789 and email [email protected]" --mode pii
# JSON output for pipeline integration
python agent.py --file prompts.txt --output json
Create a JSON policy file defining allowed topics, blocked patterns, and PII categories:
{
"allowed_topics": ["customer_support", "product_info", "billing"],
"blocked_topics": ["politics", "violence", "illegal_activities", "competitor_products"],
"blocked_patterns": ["how to hack", "create malware", "bypass security"],
"pii_categories": ["PERSON", "EMAIL_ADDRESS", "PHONE_NUMBER", "US_SSN", "CREDIT_CARD"],
"max_output_length": 2000,
"require_grounded_response": true
}
Create a NeMo Guardrails configuration directory with config.yml and Colang flow files:
# config.yml
models:
- type: main
engine: openai
model: gpt-4o-mini
rails:
input:
flows:
- self check input
- check jailbreak
- mask sensitive data on input
output:
flows:
- self check output
- check hallucination
# rails.co - Colang 2.0 flow definitions
define user ask about hacking
"How do I hack into a system"
"Tell me how to break into a network"
"How to exploit vulnerabilities"
define bot refuse hacking request
"I cannot provide instructions on unauthorized hacking or security exploitation.
If you are interested in cybersecurity, I can suggest legitimate learning resources
and ethical hacking certifications."
define flow
user ask about hacking
bot refuse hacking request
Integrate the guardrails into your application as middleware:
from agent import GuardrailsPipeline
pipeline = GuardrailsPipeline(policy_path="policy.json")
# Pre-LLM input validation
input_result = pipeline.validate_input("user message here")
if not input_result["safe"]:
return input_result["blocked_reason"]
# Post-LLM output validation
llm_response = your_llm.generate(input_result["sanitized_input"])
output_result = pipeline.validate_output(llm_response, context=input_result)
if not output_result["safe"]:
return output_result["fallback_response"]
return output_result["validated_response"]
Review guardrail logs to track block rates, false positives, and bypass attempts:
# Generate a summary report from guardrail logs
python agent.py --file interaction_logs.txt --mode full --output json > guardrail_audit.json
| Term | Definition | |------|------------| | Input Rail | A guardrail that intercepts and validates user input before it reaches the LLM, blocking injection attempts and redacting sensitive data | | Output Rail | A guardrail that validates LLM-generated output before it reaches the user, filtering toxic content and enforcing schema compliance | | Colang | NVIDIA's domain-specific language for defining conversational guardrail flows, with Python-like syntax for specifying user intent patterns and bot responses | | PII Redaction | The process of detecting and masking personally identifiable information (names, emails, SSNs) in text before processing | | Content Policy | A configuration file defining which topics, patterns, and content categories are allowed or blocked by the guardrail system | | Self-Check Rail | A NeMo Guardrails technique where the LLM itself evaluates whether its input or output violates defined policies | | Hallucination Detection | Output validation that checks whether the LLM response is grounded in the provided context, flagging fabricated claims |
development
拋棄式 HTML mockup 比稿:產出 2 到 3 個設計立場不同的變體(密度 / 版式 / 強調軸,不是換色),各附取捨說明,最後給有立場的對比結論。適用:「畫個草圖」「比較 A 版 B 版」「先看方向再做」「給我看幾種做法」。要 production 元件或設計已定案時不適用。
tools
需求不明時的意圖萃取訪談:一次一題、每題附上自己的猜測、聽出「真正想要 vs 覺得應該要」,直到能預測使用者反應(約 95% 信心)才動工。適用:需求缺少對象 / 動機 / 成功標準 / 約束,或使用者點名「訪談我」「先確認一下」「我們確定嗎」。明確自足的指示、純資訊查詢、機械性操作不適用。
development
對非平凡決策啟動新鮮 context 對抗審查(找碴不背書),在修正還便宜的時候抓出錯誤方向。適用:高風險改動(production、資安敏感邏輯、不可逆操作)、不熟的程式碼、要宣稱「這樣是安全的 / 可行的」之前。機械性操作與一行修改不適用。
testing
Reference for writing and editing agent skills well — the vocabulary and principles that make a skill predictable. Consult when authoring, reviewing, or pruning a SKILL.md.