external/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills/skills/implementing-cisa-zero-trust-maturity-model/SKILL.md
Assess, gap-analyze, and progressively implement the CISA Zero Trust Maturity Model v2.0 across five pillars (Identity, Devices, Networks, Applications & Workloads, Data) and three cross-cutting capabilities (Visibility/Analytics, Automation/Orchestration, Governance), from Traditional through Optimal maturity. Use for a federal/enterprise ZTMM assessment, phased roadmap, or mapping controls to NIST SP 800-207 and EO 14028.
npx skillsauth add seikaikyo/dash-skills implementing-cisa-zero-trust-maturity-modelInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
The CISA Zero Trust Maturity Model (ZTMM) Version 2.0, released in April 2023, provides federal agencies and organizations with a structured roadmap for adopting zero trust architecture. The model defines five core pillars -- Identity, Devices, Networks, Applications & Workloads, and Data -- each progressing through four maturity stages: Traditional, Initial, Advanced, and Optimal. Three cross-cutting capabilities (Visibility and Analytics, Automation and Orchestration, and Governance) span all pillars. This skill covers assessment, gap analysis, and progressive implementation across all pillars and maturity levels.
Identity refers to attributes that uniquely describe an agency user or entity, including non-person entities (NPEs) such as service accounts and machine identities.
Traditional Stage:
Initial Stage:
Advanced Stage:
Optimal Stage:
Devices include any hardware, software, or firmware asset that connects to a network -- servers, laptops, mobile phones, IoT devices, and network equipment.
Traditional Stage:
Initial Stage:
Advanced Stage:
Optimal Stage:
Networks encompass all communications media including internal networks, wireless, and the internet.
Traditional Stage:
Initial Stage:
Advanced Stage:
Optimal Stage:
Applications and workloads include agency systems, programs, and services running on-premises, on mobile devices, and in cloud environments.
Traditional Stage:
Initial Stage:
Advanced Stage:
Optimal Stage:
Data encompasses all structured and unstructured information, at rest, in transit, and in use.
Traditional Stage:
Initial Stage:
Advanced Stage:
Optimal Stage:
Maturity Progression:
Traditional -> Manual log review, limited SIEM
Initial -> Centralized logging, basic SIEM correlation
Advanced -> UEBA, automated threat detection, data lake analytics
Optimal -> AI/ML-driven continuous monitoring, predictive analytics
Maturity Progression:
Traditional -> Manual incident response, ad-hoc scripts
Initial -> Basic SOAR playbooks, automated alerting
Advanced -> Integrated SOAR with multi-pillar orchestration
Optimal -> Fully autonomous response, self-healing infrastructure
Maturity Progression:
Traditional -> Ad-hoc policies, manual compliance checks
Initial -> Documented zero trust strategy, basic policy framework
Advanced -> Policy-as-code, continuous compliance monitoring
Optimal -> Dynamic policy engine, real-time governance decisions
# Example: CISA ZTMM Maturity Assessment Scoring
class ZTMMAssessment:
PILLARS = ['Identity', 'Devices', 'Networks', 'Applications', 'Data']
STAGES = ['Traditional', 'Initial', 'Advanced', 'Optimal']
CROSS_CUTTING = ['Visibility_Analytics', 'Automation_Orchestration', 'Governance']
def __init__(self):
self.scores = {}
def assess_pillar(self, pillar, capabilities):
"""
Assess a pillar against ZTMM criteria.
capabilities: dict of capability_name -> maturity_stage
"""
stage_values = {stage: i for i, stage in enumerate(self.STAGES)}
scores = [stage_values.get(stage, 0) for stage in capabilities.values()]
avg_score = sum(scores) / len(scores) if scores else 0
overall_stage = self.STAGES[int(avg_score)]
self.scores[pillar] = {
'capabilities': capabilities,
'average_score': avg_score,
'overall_stage': overall_stage
}
return self.scores[pillar]
def generate_roadmap(self):
"""Generate prioritized improvement roadmap."""
roadmap = []
for pillar, data in self.scores.items():
for capability, stage in data['capabilities'].items():
stage_idx = self.STAGES.index(stage)
if stage_idx < 3: # Not yet Optimal
next_stage = self.STAGES[stage_idx + 1]
roadmap.append({
'pillar': pillar,
'capability': capability,
'current': stage,
'target': next_stage,
'priority': 3 - stage_idx # Higher priority for lower maturity
})
return sorted(roadmap, key=lambda x: x['priority'], reverse=True)
| CISA ZTMM Pillar | OMB M-22-09 Requirement | NIST 800-207 Section | |---|---|---| | Identity | MFA for agency staff | 3.1.1 | | Devices | EDR for federal endpoints | 3.1.2 | | Networks | Encrypt DNS traffic | 3.1.3 | | Applications | Application security testing | 3.1.4 | | Data | Data categorization | 3.1.5 |
tools
Conduct comprehensive GDPR compliance assessments by evaluating data processing activities against EU Regulation 2016/679, including Article 30 records of processing, lawful basis validation, data subject rights implementation, Data Protection Impact Assessments (DPIAs) under Article 35, breach notification procedures, international transfer safeguards (SCCs, adequacy decisions), and technical/organizational measures under Article 32. Use when processing personal data of EU residents, preparing for supervisory authority audits, implementing privacy-by-design for new systems, scoping compliance gaps for M&A due diligence, assessing third-party processors, or responding to data subject access requests at scale. Incorporates 2026 guidance from ICO, EDPB, and post-Data (Use and Access) Act 2025 UK-GDPR considerations. Do not use for implementing specific Article 32 controls — use implementing-gdpr-data-protection-controls; or for DSAR automation — use implementing-gdpr-data-subject-access-request.
tools
Parse Windows forensic artifacts—$MFT/$J (MFTECmd), Prefetch (PECmd), registry hives (RECmd), shellbags, and Amcache—into normalized CSV/JSON with Eric Zimmerman's EZ Tools, then load results into Timeline Explorer for analysis. Use during DFIR/incident-response investigations, after triage collection (e.g. with KAPE), to establish program execution, file/folder access, and persistence evidence from acquired forensic images.
development
Build automated multi-turn adversarial attacks against conversational LLM targets using Microsoft PyRIT's RedTeamingOrchestrator, CrescendoOrchestrator (gradual escalation), and TreeOfAttacksWithPruningOrchestrator (adaptive branching), with scorer feedback loops and persisted conversation memory. Use when single-shot LLM scanning is insufficient and you need multi-turn, scorer-driven AI red-team campaigns against a chatbot or agent.
testing
Stand up MISP, enable and cache curated threat feeds (CIRCL, abuse.ch, Feodo Tracker), apply warninglists to suppress false positives, query indicators with PyMISP, and export attributes as auto-generated Suricata/Sigma/Wazuh detection rules. Use when maturing a MISP instance to actively drive detection, curating threat feeds with quality controls, or automating IOC-to-detection pipelines for the SIEM/IDS.