external/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills/skills/implementing-cisa-zero-trust-maturity-model/SKILL.md
Implement the CISA Zero Trust Maturity Model v2.0 across the five pillars of identity, devices, networks, applications, and data to achieve progressive organizational zero trust maturity.
npx skillsauth add seikaikyo/dash-skills implementing-cisa-zero-trust-maturity-modelInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
The CISA Zero Trust Maturity Model (ZTMM) Version 2.0, released in April 2023, provides federal agencies and organizations with a structured roadmap for adopting zero trust architecture. The model defines five core pillars -- Identity, Devices, Networks, Applications & Workloads, and Data -- each progressing through four maturity stages: Traditional, Initial, Advanced, and Optimal. Three cross-cutting capabilities (Visibility and Analytics, Automation and Orchestration, and Governance) span all pillars. This skill covers assessment, gap analysis, and progressive implementation across all pillars and maturity levels.
Identity refers to attributes that uniquely describe an agency user or entity, including non-person entities (NPEs) such as service accounts and machine identities.
Traditional Stage:
Initial Stage:
Advanced Stage:
Optimal Stage:
Devices include any hardware, software, or firmware asset that connects to a network -- servers, laptops, mobile phones, IoT devices, and network equipment.
Traditional Stage:
Initial Stage:
Advanced Stage:
Optimal Stage:
Networks encompass all communications media including internal networks, wireless, and the internet.
Traditional Stage:
Initial Stage:
Advanced Stage:
Optimal Stage:
Applications and workloads include agency systems, programs, and services running on-premises, on mobile devices, and in cloud environments.
Traditional Stage:
Initial Stage:
Advanced Stage:
Optimal Stage:
Data encompasses all structured and unstructured information, at rest, in transit, and in use.
Traditional Stage:
Initial Stage:
Advanced Stage:
Optimal Stage:
Maturity Progression:
Traditional -> Manual log review, limited SIEM
Initial -> Centralized logging, basic SIEM correlation
Advanced -> UEBA, automated threat detection, data lake analytics
Optimal -> AI/ML-driven continuous monitoring, predictive analytics
Maturity Progression:
Traditional -> Manual incident response, ad-hoc scripts
Initial -> Basic SOAR playbooks, automated alerting
Advanced -> Integrated SOAR with multi-pillar orchestration
Optimal -> Fully autonomous response, self-healing infrastructure
Maturity Progression:
Traditional -> Ad-hoc policies, manual compliance checks
Initial -> Documented zero trust strategy, basic policy framework
Advanced -> Policy-as-code, continuous compliance monitoring
Optimal -> Dynamic policy engine, real-time governance decisions
# Example: CISA ZTMM Maturity Assessment Scoring
class ZTMMAssessment:
PILLARS = ['Identity', 'Devices', 'Networks', 'Applications', 'Data']
STAGES = ['Traditional', 'Initial', 'Advanced', 'Optimal']
CROSS_CUTTING = ['Visibility_Analytics', 'Automation_Orchestration', 'Governance']
def __init__(self):
self.scores = {}
def assess_pillar(self, pillar, capabilities):
"""
Assess a pillar against ZTMM criteria.
capabilities: dict of capability_name -> maturity_stage
"""
stage_values = {stage: i for i, stage in enumerate(self.STAGES)}
scores = [stage_values.get(stage, 0) for stage in capabilities.values()]
avg_score = sum(scores) / len(scores) if scores else 0
overall_stage = self.STAGES[int(avg_score)]
self.scores[pillar] = {
'capabilities': capabilities,
'average_score': avg_score,
'overall_stage': overall_stage
}
return self.scores[pillar]
def generate_roadmap(self):
"""Generate prioritized improvement roadmap."""
roadmap = []
for pillar, data in self.scores.items():
for capability, stage in data['capabilities'].items():
stage_idx = self.STAGES.index(stage)
if stage_idx < 3: # Not yet Optimal
next_stage = self.STAGES[stage_idx + 1]
roadmap.append({
'pillar': pillar,
'capability': capability,
'current': stage,
'target': next_stage,
'priority': 3 - stage_idx # Higher priority for lower maturity
})
return sorted(roadmap, key=lambda x: x['priority'], reverse=True)
| CISA ZTMM Pillar | OMB M-22-09 Requirement | NIST 800-207 Section | |---|---|---| | Identity | MFA for agency staff | 3.1.1 | | Devices | EDR for federal endpoints | 3.1.2 | | Networks | Encrypt DNS traffic | 3.1.3 | | Applications | Application security testing | 3.1.4 | | Data | Data categorization | 3.1.5 |
development
拋棄式 HTML mockup 比稿:產出 2 到 3 個設計立場不同的變體(密度 / 版式 / 強調軸,不是換色),各附取捨說明,最後給有立場的對比結論。適用:「畫個草圖」「比較 A 版 B 版」「先看方向再做」「給我看幾種做法」。要 production 元件或設計已定案時不適用。
tools
需求不明時的意圖萃取訪談:一次一題、每題附上自己的猜測、聽出「真正想要 vs 覺得應該要」,直到能預測使用者反應(約 95% 信心)才動工。適用:需求缺少對象 / 動機 / 成功標準 / 約束,或使用者點名「訪談我」「先確認一下」「我們確定嗎」。明確自足的指示、純資訊查詢、機械性操作不適用。
development
對非平凡決策啟動新鮮 context 對抗審查(找碴不背書),在修正還便宜的時候抓出錯誤方向。適用:高風險改動(production、資安敏感邏輯、不可逆操作)、不熟的程式碼、要宣稱「這樣是安全的 / 可行的」之前。機械性操作與一行修改不適用。
testing
Reference for writing and editing agent skills well — the vocabulary and principles that make a skill predictable. Consult when authoring, reviewing, or pruning a SKILL.md.