external/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills/skills/hunting-for-beaconing-with-frequency-analysis/SKILL.md
Identify command-and-control beaconing patterns in network traffic by applying statistical frequency analysis, jitter calculation, and coefficient of variation scoring to detect periodic callbacks from compromised endpoints.
npx skillsauth add seikaikyo/dash-skills hunting-for-beaconing-with-frequency-analysisInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
| Concept | Description | |---------|-------------| | T1071.001 | Application Layer Protocol: Web Protocols -- HTTP/HTTPS beaconing | | T1071.004 | Application Layer Protocol: DNS -- DNS-based C2 tunneling | | T1573 | Encrypted Channel -- TLS/SSL encrypted C2 communication | | T1568.002 | Dynamic Resolution: Domain Generation Algorithms | | Coefficient of Variation | Standard deviation divided by mean; values below 0.20 indicate periodicity | | Jitter | Random variation added to beacon interval to evade detection | | RITA Beacon Score | Composite score from connection regularity, data size consistency, and connection count | | JA3/JA4 Fingerprinting | TLS client fingerprinting to identify C2 framework signatures | | Fast-Flux DNS | Rapidly changing DNS resolution used to protect C2 infrastructure |
| Tool | Purpose | |------|---------| | RITA (Real Intelligence Threat Analytics) | Automated beacon scoring from Zeek logs | | AC-Hunter | Commercial threat hunting platform with beacon detection | | Splunk | SPL-based statistical beacon analysis with streamstats | | Elastic Security | ML anomaly detection for periodic network behavior | | Zeek | Network metadata collection (conn.log, dns.log, ssl.log) | | Suricata | Network IDS with JA3/JA4 TLS fingerprint extraction | | FLARE | C2 profile and beacon pattern detection | | VirusTotal | Domain and IP reputation enrichment |
index=proxy OR index=firewall
| where NOT match(dest, "(?i)(microsoft|google|amazonaws|cloudflare|akamai)")
| bin _time span=1s
| stats count by src_ip dest _time
| streamstats current=f last(_time) as prev_time by src_ip dest
| eval interval=_time-prev_time
| stats count avg(interval) as avg_interval stdev(interval) as stdev_interval
min(interval) as min_interval max(interval) as max_interval by src_ip dest
| where count > 50
| eval cv=stdev_interval/avg_interval
| where cv < 0.20 AND avg_interval > 30 AND avg_interval < 86400
| sort cv
| table src_ip dest count avg_interval stdev_interval cv
DeviceNetworkEvents
| where Timestamp > ago(24h)
| where RemoteIPType == "Public"
| summarize ConnectionTimes=make_list(Timestamp), Count=count() by DeviceName, RemoteIP, RemoteUrl
| where Count > 50
| extend Intervals = array_sort_asc(ConnectionTimes)
| mv-apply Intervals on (
extend NextTime = next(Intervals)
| where isnotempty(NextTime)
| extend IntervalSec = datetime_diff('second', NextTime, Intervals)
| summarize AvgInterval=avg(IntervalSec), StdDev=stdev(IntervalSec)
)
| extend CV = StdDev / AvgInterval
| where CV < 0.2 and AvgInterval > 30
| sort by CV asc
title: Potential C2 Beaconing Pattern Detected
status: experimental
logsource:
category: proxy
detection:
selection:
dst_ip|cidr: '!10.0.0.0/8'
timeframe: 24h
condition: selection | count(dst) by src_ip > 50
level: medium
tags:
- attack.command_and_control
- attack.t1071.001
Hunt ID: TH-BEACON-[DATE]-[SEQ]
Source IP: [Internal IP]
Source Host: [Hostname from DHCP/DNS]
Destination: [Domain/IP]
Protocol: [HTTP/HTTPS/DNS]
Beacon Interval: [Average seconds]
Jitter Estimate: [Percentage]
Coefficient of Variation: [CV value]
Connection Count: [Total connections in window]
Data Size CV: [Payload consistency metric]
Domain Age: [Days since registration]
TI Match: [Yes/No -- source]
Risk Score: [0-100]
Risk Level: [Critical/High/Medium/Low]
Indicators: [List of triggered risk factors]
tools
Conduct comprehensive GDPR compliance assessments by evaluating data processing activities against EU Regulation 2016/679, including Article 30 records of processing, lawful basis validation, data subject rights implementation, Data Protection Impact Assessments (DPIAs) under Article 35, breach notification procedures, international transfer safeguards (SCCs, adequacy decisions), and technical/organizational measures under Article 32. Use when processing personal data of EU residents, preparing for supervisory authority audits, implementing privacy-by-design for new systems, scoping compliance gaps for M&A due diligence, assessing third-party processors, or responding to data subject access requests at scale. Incorporates 2026 guidance from ICO, EDPB, and post-Data (Use and Access) Act 2025 UK-GDPR considerations. Do not use for implementing specific Article 32 controls — use implementing-gdpr-data-protection-controls; or for DSAR automation — use implementing-gdpr-data-subject-access-request.
tools
Parse Windows forensic artifacts—$MFT/$J (MFTECmd), Prefetch (PECmd), registry hives (RECmd), shellbags, and Amcache—into normalized CSV/JSON with Eric Zimmerman's EZ Tools, then load results into Timeline Explorer for analysis. Use during DFIR/incident-response investigations, after triage collection (e.g. with KAPE), to establish program execution, file/folder access, and persistence evidence from acquired forensic images.
development
Build automated multi-turn adversarial attacks against conversational LLM targets using Microsoft PyRIT's RedTeamingOrchestrator, CrescendoOrchestrator (gradual escalation), and TreeOfAttacksWithPruningOrchestrator (adaptive branching), with scorer feedback loops and persisted conversation memory. Use when single-shot LLM scanning is insufficient and you need multi-turn, scorer-driven AI red-team campaigns against a chatbot or agent.
testing
Stand up MISP, enable and cache curated threat feeds (CIRCL, abuse.ch, Feodo Tracker), apply warninglists to suppress false positives, query indicators with PyMISP, and export attributes as auto-generated Suricata/Sigma/Wazuh detection rules. Use when maturing a MISP instance to actively drive detection, curating threat feeds with quality controls, or automating IOC-to-detection pipelines for the SIEM/IDS.