external/cc-skills-golang/golang-grpc/SKILL.md
Provides gRPC usage guidelines, protobuf organization, and production-ready patterns for Golang microservices. Use when implementing, reviewing, or debugging gRPC servers/clients, writing proto files, setting up interceptors, handling gRPC errors with status codes, configuring TLS/mTLS, testing with bufconn, or working with streaming RPCs.
npx skillsauth add seikaikyo/dash-skills golang-grpcInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Persona: You are a Go distributed systems engineer. You design gRPC services for correctness and operability — proper status codes, deadlines, interceptors, and graceful shutdown matter as much as the happy path.
Modes:
Dependencies:
brew install protobufgo install google.golang.org/protobuf/cmd/protoc-gen-go@latestgo install google.golang.org/grpc/cmd/protoc-gen-go-grpc@latestTreat gRPC as a pure transport layer — keep it separate from business logic. The official Go implementation is google.golang.org/grpc.
This skill is not exhaustive. Please refer to library documentation and code examples for more information. For Go package docs, symbols, versions, importers, and known vulnerabilities, → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-pkg-go-dev skill (godig) — prefer it over Context7 for Go package facts. To navigate this library's usage in your own code (definitions, call sites, diagnostics), → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-gopls skill (gopls). Context7 remains a fallback for docs not indexed on pkg.go.dev.
| Concern | Package / Tool |
| --- | --- |
| Service definition | protoc or buf with .proto files |
| Code generation | protoc-gen-go, protoc-gen-go-grpc |
| Error handling | google.golang.org/grpc/status with codes |
| Rich error details | google.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/rpc/errdetails |
| Interceptors | grpc.ChainUnaryInterceptor, grpc.ChainStreamInterceptor |
| Middleware ecosystem | github.com/grpc-ecosystem/go-grpc-middleware |
| Testing | google.golang.org/grpc/test/bufconn |
| TLS / mTLS | google.golang.org/grpc/credentials |
| Health checks | google.golang.org/grpc/health |
Organize by domain with versioned directories (proto/user/v1/). Always use Request/Response wrapper messages — bare types like string cannot have fields added later. Generate with buf generate or protoc.
Proto & code generation reference
grpc_health_v1) — Kubernetes probes need it to determine readinessGracefulStop() with a timeout fallback to Stop() — drains in-flight RPCs while preventing hangssrv := grpc.NewServer(
grpc.ChainUnaryInterceptor(loggingInterceptor, recoveryInterceptor),
)
pb.RegisterUserServiceServer(srv, svc)
healthpb.RegisterHealthServer(srv, health.NewServer())
go srv.Serve(lis)
// On shutdown signal:
stopped := make(chan struct{})
go func() { srv.GracefulStop(); close(stopped) }()
select {
case <-stopped:
case <-time.After(15 * time.Second):
srv.Stop()
}
func loggingInterceptor(ctx context.Context, req any, info *grpc.UnaryServerInfo, handler grpc.UnaryHandler) (any, error) {
start := time.Now()
resp, err := handler(ctx, req)
log.Printf("method=%s duration=%s code=%s", info.FullMethod, time.Since(start), status.Code(err))
return resp, err
}
context.WithTimeout) — without one, a slow upstream hangs goroutines indefinitelyround_robin with headless Kubernetes services via dns:/// schememetadata.NewOutgoingContextconn, err := grpc.NewClient("dns:///user-service:50051",
grpc.WithTransportCredentials(creds),
grpc.WithDefaultServiceConfig(`{
"loadBalancingPolicy": "round_robin",
"methodConfig": [{
"name": [{"service": ""}],
"timeout": "5s",
"retryPolicy": {
"maxAttempts": 3,
"initialBackoff": "0.1s",
"maxBackoff": "1s",
"backoffMultiplier": 2,
"retryableStatusCodes": ["UNAVAILABLE"]
}
}]
}`),
)
client := pb.NewUserServiceClient(conn)
Always return gRPC errors using status.Error with a specific code — a raw error becomes codes.Unknown, telling the client nothing actionable. Clients use codes to decide retry vs fail-fast vs degrade.
| Code | When to Use |
| -------------------- | ------------------------------------------- |
| InvalidArgument | Malformed input (missing field, bad format) |
| NotFound | Entity does not exist |
| AlreadyExists | Create failed, entity exists |
| PermissionDenied | Caller lacks permission |
| Unauthenticated | Missing or invalid token |
| FailedPrecondition | System not in required state |
| ResourceExhausted | Rate limit or quota exceeded |
| Unavailable | Transient issue, safe to retry |
| Internal | Unexpected bug |
| DeadlineExceeded | Timeout |
// ✗ Bad — caller gets codes.Unknown, can't decide whether to retry
return nil, fmt.Errorf("user not found")
// ✓ Good — specific code lets clients act appropriately
if errors.Is(err, ErrNotFound) {
return nil, status.Errorf(codes.NotFound, "user %q not found", req.UserId)
}
return nil, status.Errorf(codes.Internal, "lookup failed: %v", err)
For field-level validation errors, attach errdetails.BadRequest via status.WithDetails.
| Pattern | Use Case | | --- | --- | | Server streaming | Server sends a sequence (log tailing, result sets) | | Client streaming | Client sends a sequence, server responds once (file upload, batch) | | Bidirectional | Both send independently (chat, real-time sync) |
Prefer streaming over large single messages — avoids per-message size limits and lowers memory pressure.
func (s *server) ListUsers(req *pb.ListUsersRequest, stream pb.UserService_ListUsersServer) error {
for _, u := range users {
if err := stream.Send(u); err != nil {
return err
}
}
return nil
}
Use bufconn for in-memory connections that exercise the full gRPC stack (serialization, interceptors, metadata) without network overhead. Always test that error scenarios return the expected gRPC status codes.
Testing patterns and examples
credentials.PerRPCCredentials and validate tokens in an auth interceptor| Setting | Purpose | Typical Value |
| --- | --- | --- |
| keepalive.ServerParameters.Time | Ping interval for idle connections | 30s |
| keepalive.ServerParameters.Timeout | Ping ack timeout | 10s |
| grpc.MaxRecvMsgSize | Override 4 MB default for large payloads | 16 MB |
| Connection pooling | Multiple conns for high-load streaming | 4 connections |
Most services do not need connection pooling — profile before adding complexity.
| Mistake | Fix |
| --- | --- |
| Returning raw error | Becomes codes.Unknown — client can't decide whether to retry. Use status.Errorf with a specific code |
| No deadline on client calls | Slow upstream hangs indefinitely. Always context.WithTimeout |
| New connection per request | Wastes TCP/TLS handshakes. Create once, reuse — HTTP/2 multiplexes RPCs |
| Reflection enabled in production | Lets attackers enumerate every method. Enable only in dev/staging |
| codes.Internal for all errors | Wrong codes break client retry logic. Unavailable triggers retry; InvalidArgument does not |
| Bare types as RPC arguments | Can't add fields to string. Wrapper messages allow backwards-compatible evolution |
| Missing health check service | Kubernetes can't determine readiness, kills pods during deployments |
| Ignoring context cancellation | Long operations continue after caller gave up. Check ctx.Err() |
samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-context skill for deadline and cancellation patternssamber/cc-skills-golang@golang-error-handling skill for gRPC error to Go error mappingsamber/cc-skills-golang@golang-observability skill for gRPC interceptors (logging, tracing, metrics)samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-testing skill for gRPC testing with bufconndevelopment
拋棄式 HTML mockup 比稿:產出 2 到 3 個設計立場不同的變體(密度 / 版式 / 強調軸,不是換色),各附取捨說明,最後給有立場的對比結論。適用:「畫個草圖」「比較 A 版 B 版」「先看方向再做」「給我看幾種做法」。要 production 元件或設計已定案時不適用。
tools
需求不明時的意圖萃取訪談:一次一題、每題附上自己的猜測、聽出「真正想要 vs 覺得應該要」,直到能預測使用者反應(約 95% 信心)才動工。適用:需求缺少對象 / 動機 / 成功標準 / 約束,或使用者點名「訪談我」「先確認一下」「我們確定嗎」。明確自足的指示、純資訊查詢、機械性操作不適用。
development
對非平凡決策啟動新鮮 context 對抗審查(找碴不背書),在修正還便宜的時候抓出錯誤方向。適用:高風險改動(production、資安敏感邏輯、不可逆操作)、不熟的程式碼、要宣稱「這樣是安全的 / 可行的」之前。機械性操作與一行修改不適用。
testing
Reference for writing and editing agent skills well — the vocabulary and principles that make a skill predictable. Consult when authoring, reviewing, or pruning a SKILL.md.