external/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills/skills/building-vulnerability-scanning-workflow/SKILL.md
Builds a structured vulnerability scanning workflow using tools like Nessus, Qualys, and OpenVAS to discover, prioritize, and track remediation of security vulnerabilities across infrastructure. Use when SOC teams need to establish recurring vulnerability assessment processes, integrate scan results with SIEM alerting, and build remediation tracking dashboards.
npx skillsauth add seikaikyo/dash-skills building-vulnerability-scanning-workflowInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Use this skill when:
Do not use for penetration testing or active exploitation — vulnerability scanning identifies weaknesses, penetration testing validates exploitability.
Create scan policies covering all asset types:
Nessus Scan Configuration (API):
import requests
nessus_url = "https://nessus.company.com:8834"
headers = {"X-ApiKeys": f"accessKey={access_key};secretKey={secret_key}"}
# Create scan policy
policy = {
"uuid": "advanced",
"settings": {
"name": "SOC Weekly Infrastructure Scan",
"description": "Weekly credentialed scan of all server and workstation segments",
"scanner_id": 1,
"policy_id": 0,
"text_targets": "10.0.0.0/16, 172.16.0.0/12",
"launch": "WEEKLY",
"starttime": "20240315T020000",
"rrules": "FREQ=WEEKLY;INTERVAL=1;BYDAY=SA",
"enabled": True
},
"credentials": {
"add": {
"Host": {
"Windows": [{
"domain": "company.local",
"username": "nessus_svc",
"password": "SCAN_SERVICE_PASSWORD",
"auth_method": "Password"
}],
"SSH": [{
"username": "nessus_svc",
"private_key": "/path/to/nessus_key",
"auth_method": "public key"
}]
}
}
}
}
response = requests.post(f"{nessus_url}/scans", headers=headers, json=policy,
verify=not os.environ.get("SKIP_TLS_VERIFY", "").lower() == "true") # Set SKIP_TLS_VERIFY=true for self-signed certs in lab environments
scan_id = response.json()["scan"]["id"]
print(f"Scan created: ID {scan_id}")
Qualys VMDR Scan via API:
import qualysapi
conn = qualysapi.connect(
hostname="qualysapi.qualys.com",
username="api_user",
password="API_PASSWORD"
)
# Launch vulnerability scan
params = {
"action": "launch",
"scan_title": "Weekly_Infrastructure_Scan",
"ip": "10.0.0.0/16",
"option_id": "123456", # Scan profile ID
"iscanner_name": "Internal_Scanner_01",
"priority": "0"
}
response = conn.request("/api/2.0/fo/scan/", params)
print(f"Scan launched: {response}")
Download results and apply risk-based prioritization:
import requests
import csv
# Export Nessus results
response = requests.get(
f"{nessus_url}/scans/{scan_id}/export",
headers=headers,
params={"format": "csv"},
verify=not os.environ.get("SKIP_TLS_VERIFY", "").lower() == "true", # Set SKIP_TLS_VERIFY=true for self-signed certs in lab environments
)
# Parse and prioritize
vulns = []
reader = csv.DictReader(response.text.splitlines())
for row in reader:
cvss = float(row.get("CVSS v3.0 Base Score", 0))
asset_criticality = get_asset_criticality(row["Host"]) # From asset inventory
# Risk-based priority calculation
risk_score = cvss * asset_criticality_multiplier(asset_criticality)
# Boost score if actively exploited (check CISA KEV)
if row.get("CVE") in cisa_kev_list:
risk_score *= 1.5
vulns.append({
"host": row["Host"],
"plugin_name": row["Name"],
"severity": row["Risk"],
"cvss": cvss,
"cve": row.get("CVE", "N/A"),
"risk_score": round(risk_score, 1),
"asset_criticality": asset_criticality,
"kev": row.get("CVE") in cisa_kev_list
})
# Sort by risk score
vulns.sort(key=lambda x: x["risk_score"], reverse=True)
CISA KEV (Known Exploited Vulnerabilities) Check:
import requests
kev_response = requests.get(
"https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/feeds/known_exploited_vulnerabilities.json"
)
kev_data = kev_response.json()
cisa_kev_list = {v["cveID"] for v in kev_data["vulnerabilities"]}
# Check if vulnerability is actively exploited
def is_actively_exploited(cve_id):
return cve_id in cisa_kev_list
Apply SLA-based remediation timelines:
| Priority | CVSS Range | Asset Type | SLA | Examples | |----------|-----------|------------|-----|---------| | P1 Critical | 9.0-10.0 + KEV | All assets | 24 hours | Log4Shell, EternalBlue on prod servers | | P2 High | 7.0-8.9 or 9.0+ non-KEV | Business-critical | 7 days | RCE without known exploit | | P3 Medium | 4.0-6.9 | Business-critical | 30 days | Authenticated privilege escalation | | P4 Low | 0.1-3.9 | Standard | 90 days | Information disclosure, low-impact DoS | | P5 Informational | 0.0 | Development | Next cycle | Best practice findings, config hardening |
Correlate vulnerability scan data with SIEM alerts to detect active exploitation:
index=vulnerability sourcetype="nessus:scan"
| eval vuln_key = Host.":".CVE
| join vuln_key type=left [
search index=ids_ips sourcetype="snort" OR sourcetype="suricata"
| eval vuln_key = dest_ip.":".cve_id
| stats count AS exploit_attempts, latest(_time) AS last_exploit_attempt by vuln_key
]
| where isnotnull(exploit_attempts)
| eval risk = "CRITICAL — Vulnerability being actively exploited"
| sort - exploit_attempts
| table Host, CVE, plugin_name, cvss_score, exploit_attempts, last_exploit_attempt, risk
Alert when KEV vulnerabilities are detected on critical assets:
index=vulnerability sourcetype="nessus:scan" severity="Critical"
| lookup cisa_kev_lookup.csv cve_id AS CVE OUTPUT kev_status, due_date
| where kev_status="active"
| lookup asset_criticality_lookup.csv ip AS Host OUTPUT criticality
| where criticality IN ("business-critical", "mission-critical")
| table Host, CVE, plugin_name, cvss_score, kev_status, due_date, criticality
Splunk Dashboard for Vulnerability Metrics:
-- Open vulnerabilities by severity
index=vulnerability sourcetype="nessus:scan" status="open"
| stats count by severity
| eval order = case(severity="Critical", 1, severity="High", 2, severity="Medium", 3,
severity="Low", 4, 1=1, 5)
| sort order
-- SLA compliance tracking
index=vulnerability sourcetype="nessus:scan" status="open"
| eval sla_days = case(
severity="Critical", 1,
severity="High", 7,
severity="Medium", 30,
severity="Low", 90
)
| eval days_open = round((now() - first_detected) / 86400)
| eval sla_status = if(days_open > sla_days, "OVERDUE", "Within SLA")
| stats count by severity, sla_status
-- Remediation trend over 90 days
index=vulnerability sourcetype="nessus:scan"
| eval is_open = if(status="open", 1, 0)
| eval is_closed = if(status="fixed", 1, 0)
| timechart span=1w sum(is_open) AS opened, sum(is_closed) AS remediated
Create tickets automatically for high-priority findings:
import requests
servicenow_url = "https://company.service-now.com/api/now/table/incident"
headers = {
"Content-Type": "application/json",
"Authorization": f"Bearer {snow_token}"
}
for vuln in vulns:
if vuln["risk_score"] >= 8.0:
ticket = {
"short_description": f"[VULN] {vuln['cve']} — {vuln['plugin_name']} on {vuln['host']}",
"description": (
f"Vulnerability: {vuln['plugin_name']}\n"
f"CVE: {vuln['cve']}\n"
f"CVSS: {vuln['cvss']}\n"
f"Host: {vuln['host']}\n"
f"Asset Criticality: {vuln['asset_criticality']}\n"
f"CISA KEV: {'YES' if vuln['kev'] else 'NO'}\n"
f"Risk Score: {vuln['risk_score']}\n"
f"Remediation SLA: {'24 hours' if vuln['kev'] else '7 days'}"
),
"urgency": "1" if vuln["kev"] else "2",
"impact": "1" if vuln["asset_criticality"] == "business-critical" else "2",
"assignment_group": "IT Infrastructure",
"category": "Vulnerability"
}
response = requests.post(servicenow_url, headers=headers, json=ticket)
print(f"Ticket created: {response.json()['result']['number']}")
| Term | Definition | |------|-----------| | CVSS | Common Vulnerability Scoring System — standardized severity rating (0-10) for vulnerabilities | | CISA KEV | Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog — CISA-maintained list of vulnerabilities with confirmed active exploitation | | Credentialed Scan | Vulnerability scan using authenticated access for deeper detection than network-only scanning | | Asset Criticality | Business impact classification determining remediation priority (mission-critical, business-critical, standard) | | Remediation SLA | Service Level Agreement defining maximum time allowed to patch vulnerabilities by severity | | EPSS | Exploit Prediction Scoring System — ML-based probability score predicting likelihood of exploitation |
VULNERABILITY SCAN REPORT — Weekly Summary
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Scan Date: 2024-03-16 02:00 UTC
Scan Scope: 10.0.0.0/16 (1,247 hosts scanned)
Duration: 4h 23m
Coverage: 98.7% (16 hosts unreachable)
Findings:
Severity Count New CISA KEV
Critical 23 5 3
High 187 34 12
Medium 892 78 0
Low 1,456 112 0
Info 3,891 201 0
Top Priority (P1 — 24hr SLA):
CVE-2024-21762 FortiOS RCE 3 hosts KEV: YES
CVE-2024-1709 ConnectWise RCE 1 host KEV: YES
CVE-2024-3400 Palo Alto PAN-OS RCE 2 hosts KEV: YES
SLA Compliance:
Critical: 82% within SLA (4 overdue)
High: 91% within SLA (17 overdue)
Medium: 88% within SLA (107 overdue)
Tickets Created: 39 (ServiceNow)
development
拋棄式 HTML mockup 比稿:產出 2 到 3 個設計立場不同的變體(密度 / 版式 / 強調軸,不是換色),各附取捨說明,最後給有立場的對比結論。適用:「畫個草圖」「比較 A 版 B 版」「先看方向再做」「給我看幾種做法」。要 production 元件或設計已定案時不適用。
tools
需求不明時的意圖萃取訪談:一次一題、每題附上自己的猜測、聽出「真正想要 vs 覺得應該要」,直到能預測使用者反應(約 95% 信心)才動工。適用:需求缺少對象 / 動機 / 成功標準 / 約束,或使用者點名「訪談我」「先確認一下」「我們確定嗎」。明確自足的指示、純資訊查詢、機械性操作不適用。
development
對非平凡決策啟動新鮮 context 對抗審查(找碴不背書),在修正還便宜的時候抓出錯誤方向。適用:高風險改動(production、資安敏感邏輯、不可逆操作)、不熟的程式碼、要宣稱「這樣是安全的 / 可行的」之前。機械性操作與一行修改不適用。
testing
Reference for writing and editing agent skills well — the vocabulary and principles that make a skill predictable. Consult when authoring, reviewing, or pruning a SKILL.md.