external/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills/skills/building-soc-escalation-matrix/SKILL.md
Build a structured SOC escalation matrix defining severity tiers, response SLAs, escalation paths, and notification procedures for security incidents.
npx skillsauth add seikaikyo/dash-skills building-soc-escalation-matrixInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
A SOC escalation matrix defines how security incidents move through the organization based on severity, impact, and response requirements. Modern SOCs use context-driven escalation combining business risk, asset criticality, and data sensitivity rather than purely severity-based models. Organizations using AI and automation in their SOC cut detection-and-containment lifecycle to approximately 161 days, an 80-day improvement over the 241-day industry average.
| Attribute | Value | |---|---| | Impact | Active data breach, ransomware spreading, critical systems compromised | | Business Impact | Revenue loss, regulatory exposure, customer data at risk | | Initial Response | 15 minutes | | Escalation to Tier 2 | Immediate | | Escalation to Management | 30 minutes | | Resolution Target | 4 hours | | Communication | Every 30 minutes to stakeholders | | Examples | Active ransomware, confirmed data exfiltration, domain admin compromise |
| Attribute | Value | |---|---| | Impact | Confirmed compromise, limited scope, no active exfiltration | | Business Impact | Potential revenue impact, contained risk | | Initial Response | 30 minutes | | Escalation to Tier 2 | 30 minutes if unresolved | | Escalation to Management | 2 hours | | Resolution Target | 8 hours | | Communication | Every 2 hours to SOC management | | Examples | Compromised user account, malware on single endpoint, insider threat indicator |
| Attribute | Value | |---|---| | Impact | Suspicious activity requiring investigation | | Business Impact | Low immediate risk | | Initial Response | 4 hours | | Escalation to Tier 2 | 8 hours if unresolved | | Resolution Target | 24 hours | | Communication | Daily status update | | Examples | Policy violation, failed brute force, suspicious email report |
| Attribute | Value | |---|---| | Impact | Informational alerts, routine security events | | Business Impact | Minimal | | Initial Response | 8 hours | | Escalation | Only if pattern emerges | | Resolution Target | 72 hours | | Communication | Weekly summary | | Examples | Vulnerability scan findings, expired certificates, policy exceptions |
Asset Criticality
Low Medium High Critical
Severity Low P4 P4 P3 P3
Medium P4 P3 P2 P2
High P3 P2 P2 P1
Critical P2 P1 P1 P1
| Trigger | Action | |---|---| | Ransomware detected on any endpoint | P1 - Immediate Tier 3 + Management | | Domain admin account compromise | P1 - Immediate Tier 3 + Management | | Active data exfiltration to external IP | P1 - Immediate Tier 3 + Management | | Critical infrastructure (DC, SCADA) alert | P1 - Immediate Tier 2 minimum | | Executive account anomaly | P2 - Immediate Tier 2 | | Multiple hosts with same malware | P1 - Immediate Tier 2 |
| Condition | Action | |---|---| | P2 unresolved after 4 hours | Escalate to Tier 3 | | P3 unresolved after 12 hours | Escalate to Tier 2 | | Any incident unresolved past SLA | Escalate to SOC Manager | | P1 unresolved after 2 hours | Escalate to CISO |
SUBJECT: [P1 CRITICAL] Security Incident - {Incident_ID}
Incident Summary:
- Type: {incident_type}
- Affected Systems: {systems}
- Affected Users: {users}
- Current Status: {status}
- Assigned To: {analyst}
Impact Assessment:
- Business Impact: {impact}
- Data at Risk: {data_risk}
- Containment Status: {containment}
Next Actions:
- {action_1}
- {action_2}
Next Update: {time} (30-minute intervals)
Bridge Line: {conference_details}
# XSOAR escalation playbook trigger
trigger:
condition: incident.severity == "critical" AND incident.asset_criticality == "high"
action:
- assign_tier: 3
- notify: [soc_manager, ciso]
- create_war_room: true
- start_bridge: true
- set_sla: 4h
auto_escalation_rules:
- name: P2 Time-Based Escalation
condition: incident.severity == "high" AND incident.age > 4h AND incident.status != "resolved"
action:
- escalate_tier: 3
- notify: soc_manager
- add_comment: "Auto-escalated due to SLA breach"
development
拋棄式 HTML mockup 比稿:產出 2 到 3 個設計立場不同的變體(密度 / 版式 / 強調軸,不是換色),各附取捨說明,最後給有立場的對比結論。適用:「畫個草圖」「比較 A 版 B 版」「先看方向再做」「給我看幾種做法」。要 production 元件或設計已定案時不適用。
tools
需求不明時的意圖萃取訪談:一次一題、每題附上自己的猜測、聽出「真正想要 vs 覺得應該要」,直到能預測使用者反應(約 95% 信心)才動工。適用:需求缺少對象 / 動機 / 成功標準 / 約束,或使用者點名「訪談我」「先確認一下」「我們確定嗎」。明確自足的指示、純資訊查詢、機械性操作不適用。
development
對非平凡決策啟動新鮮 context 對抗審查(找碴不背書),在修正還便宜的時候抓出錯誤方向。適用:高風險改動(production、資安敏感邏輯、不可逆操作)、不熟的程式碼、要宣稱「這樣是安全的 / 可行的」之前。機械性操作與一行修改不適用。
testing
Reference for writing and editing agent skills well — the vocabulary and principles that make a skill predictable. Consult when authoring, reviewing, or pruning a SKILL.md.