external/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills/skills/building-role-mining-for-rbac-optimization/SKILL.md
Apply bottom-up and top-down role mining techniques to discover optimal RBAC roles from existing user-permission assignments, reducing role explosion and enforcing least privilege.
npx skillsauth add seikaikyo/dash-skills building-role-mining-for-rbac-optimizationInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Role mining is the process of analyzing existing user-permission assignments to discover optimal roles for a Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) system. Organizations accumulate excessive permissions over time through job changes, project assignments, and ad-hoc access grants, leading to "role explosion" where thousands of granular roles exist with significant overlap. Role mining uses data analysis -- including clustering algorithms, formal concept analysis, and graph-based methods -- to consolidate permissions into a minimal set of roles that accurately represent business functions while enforcing least privilege.
| Approach | Description | Best For | |----------|-------------|----------| | Bottom-Up | Analyze existing permissions to discover common patterns | Large datasets with organic permission growth | | Top-Down | Design roles from business requirements and job descriptions | Greenfield RBAC or organizational restructuring | | Hybrid | Combine bottom-up analysis with top-down business validation | Most production environments |
1. Permission Clustering: Group users with similar permission sets using k-means or hierarchical clustering. Users in the same cluster share a common role.
2. Formal Concept Analysis (FCA): Mathematical framework that identifies complete set of concepts (user groups sharing exact permission sets) from a binary user-permission matrix.
3. Graph-Based Mining: Model users and permissions as a bipartite graph, then find dense subgraphs representing candidate roles.
4. Boolean Matrix Decomposition: Decompose the user-permission matrix U into U ≈ R × P where R maps users to roles and P maps roles to permissions.
| Metric | Formula | Target | |--------|---------|--------| | Role Count | Total distinct roles after mining | Minimize | | Coverage | Permissions explained by mined roles / Total permissions | > 95% | | Weighted Structural Complexity (WSC) | Sum of role-user + role-permission assignments | Minimize | | Deviation | Extra permissions not covered by assigned roles | < 5% |
Collect the current access state from all identity sources:
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
# Load user-permission assignments
# Format: user_id, permission_id (one row per assignment)
assignments = pd.read_csv("user_permissions.csv")
# Create binary user-permission matrix (UPA matrix)
upa_matrix = assignments.pivot_table(
index="user_id",
columns="permission_id",
aggfunc="size",
fill_value=0
)
upa_matrix = (upa_matrix > 0).astype(int)
print(f"Users: {upa_matrix.shape[0]}")
print(f"Permissions: {upa_matrix.shape[1]}")
print(f"Assignments: {assignments.shape[0]}")
print(f"Density: {upa_matrix.values.sum() / upa_matrix.size:.2%}")
from sklearn.cluster import AgglomerativeClustering
from sklearn.metrics import silhouette_score
def find_optimal_clusters(matrix, max_k=50):
"""Find optimal number of roles using silhouette analysis."""
scores = []
for k in range(2, min(max_k, matrix.shape[0])):
clustering = AgglomerativeClustering(
n_clusters=k, metric="jaccard", linkage="average"
)
labels = clustering.fit_predict(matrix)
score = silhouette_score(matrix, labels, metric="jaccard")
scores.append((k, score))
optimal_k = max(scores, key=lambda x: x[1])[0]
return optimal_k, scores
def mine_roles_clustering(upa_matrix, n_clusters):
"""Mine roles using hierarchical clustering on Jaccard distance."""
clustering = AgglomerativeClustering(
n_clusters=n_clusters, metric="jaccard", linkage="average"
)
user_matrix = upa_matrix.values
labels = clustering.fit_predict(user_matrix)
roles = {}
for cluster_id in range(n_clusters):
cluster_users = upa_matrix.index[labels == cluster_id]
cluster_permissions = upa_matrix.loc[cluster_users]
# Core role = permissions held by >80% of cluster members
permission_frequency = cluster_permissions.mean()
core_permissions = permission_frequency[permission_frequency >= 0.8].index.tolist()
roles[f"Role_{cluster_id}"] = {
"permissions": core_permissions,
"user_count": len(cluster_users),
"users": cluster_users.tolist(),
"coverage": permission_frequency[permission_frequency >= 0.8].mean()
}
return roles, labels
def mine_roles_fca(upa_matrix, min_support=3):
"""Mine roles using Formal Concept Analysis (frequent closed itemsets)."""
from itertools import combinations
users = upa_matrix.index.tolist()
permissions = upa_matrix.columns.tolist()
concepts = []
# Find all maximal permission sets shared by at least min_support users
for size in range(len(permissions), 0, -1):
for perm_combo in combinations(permissions, size):
perm_set = set(perm_combo)
# Find users who have ALL permissions in this set
matching_users = []
for user in users:
user_perms = set(upa_matrix.columns[upa_matrix.loc[user] == 1])
if perm_set.issubset(user_perms):
matching_users.append(user)
if len(matching_users) >= min_support:
# Check if this is a closed concept (no superset with same extent)
is_closed = True
for concept in concepts:
if set(matching_users) == set(concept["users"]) and \
perm_set.issubset(set(concept["permissions"])):
is_closed = False
break
if is_closed:
concepts.append({
"permissions": list(perm_set),
"users": matching_users,
"support": len(matching_users)
})
if len(concepts) > 100: # Limit for performance
break
return concepts
def evaluate_role_set(roles, upa_matrix):
"""Evaluate the quality of a mined role set."""
total_assignments = upa_matrix.values.sum()
covered_assignments = 0
extra_assignments = 0
for role_name, role_data in roles.items():
role_perms = set(role_data["permissions"])
for user in role_data["users"]:
user_perms = set(upa_matrix.columns[upa_matrix.loc[user] == 1])
covered = role_perms.intersection(user_perms)
extra = role_perms - user_perms
covered_assignments += len(covered)
extra_assignments += len(extra)
metrics = {
"total_roles": len(roles),
"total_assignments": total_assignments,
"covered_assignments": covered_assignments,
"coverage_rate": covered_assignments / total_assignments if total_assignments else 0,
"extra_permissions": extra_assignments,
"deviation_rate": extra_assignments / (covered_assignments + extra_assignments) if (covered_assignments + extra_assignments) else 0,
"avg_role_size": np.mean([len(r["permissions"]) for r in roles.values()]),
"avg_users_per_role": np.mean([r["user_count"] for r in roles.values()]),
}
return metrics
After mining candidate roles:
development
拋棄式 HTML mockup 比稿:產出 2 到 3 個設計立場不同的變體(密度 / 版式 / 強調軸,不是換色),各附取捨說明,最後給有立場的對比結論。適用:「畫個草圖」「比較 A 版 B 版」「先看方向再做」「給我看幾種做法」。要 production 元件或設計已定案時不適用。
tools
需求不明時的意圖萃取訪談:一次一題、每題附上自己的猜測、聽出「真正想要 vs 覺得應該要」,直到能預測使用者反應(約 95% 信心)才動工。適用:需求缺少對象 / 動機 / 成功標準 / 約束,或使用者點名「訪談我」「先確認一下」「我們確定嗎」。明確自足的指示、純資訊查詢、機械性操作不適用。
development
對非平凡決策啟動新鮮 context 對抗審查(找碴不背書),在修正還便宜的時候抓出錯誤方向。適用:高風險改動(production、資安敏感邏輯、不可逆操作)、不熟的程式碼、要宣稱「這樣是安全的 / 可行的」之前。機械性操作與一行修改不適用。
testing
Reference for writing and editing agent skills well — the vocabulary and principles that make a skill predictable. Consult when authoring, reviewing, or pruning a SKILL.md.