openclaw-skills/social-media-analyzer/SKILL.md
Social media campaign analysis and performance tracking. Calculates engagement rates, ROI, and benchmarks across platforms. Use for analyzing social media performance, calculating engagement rate, measuring campaign ROI, comparing platform metrics, or benchmarking against industry standards.
npx skillsauth add seaworld008/commonly-used-high-value-skills social-media-analyzerInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Campaign performance analysis with engagement metrics, ROI calculations, and platform benchmarks.
Analyze social media campaign performance:
| Field | Required | Description | |-------|----------|-------------| | platform | Yes | instagram, facebook, twitter, linkedin, tiktok | | posts[] | Yes | Array of post data | | posts[].likes | Yes | Like/reaction count | | posts[].comments | Yes | Comment count | | posts[].reach | Yes | Unique users reached | | posts[].impressions | No | Total views | | posts[].shares | No | Share/retweet count | | posts[].saves | No | Save/bookmark count | | posts[].clicks | No | Link clicks | | total_spend | No | Ad spend (for ROI) |
Before analysis, verify:
Engagement Rate = (Likes + Comments + Shares + Saves) / Reach × 100
| Metric | Formula | Interpretation | |--------|---------|----------------| | Engagement Rate | Engagements / Reach × 100 | Audience interaction level | | CTR | Clicks / Impressions × 100 | Content click appeal | | Reach Rate | Reach / Followers × 100 | Content distribution | | Virality Rate | Shares / Impressions × 100 | Share-worthiness | | Save Rate | Saves / Reach × 100 | Content value |
| Rating | Engagement Rate | Action | |--------|-----------------|--------| | Excellent | > 6% | Scale and replicate | | Good | 3-6% | Optimize and expand | | Average | 1-3% | Test improvements | | Poor | < 1% | Analyze and pivot |
Calculate return on ad spend:
| Metric | Formula | |--------|---------| | Cost Per Engagement (CPE) | Total Spend / Total Engagements | | Cost Per Click (CPC) | Total Spend / Total Clicks | | Cost Per Thousand (CPM) | (Spend / Impressions) × 1000 | | Return on Ad Spend (ROAS) | Revenue / Ad Spend |
| Action | Value | Rationale | |--------|-------|-----------| | Like | $0.50 | Brand awareness | | Comment | $2.00 | Active engagement | | Share | $5.00 | Amplification | | Save | $3.00 | Intent signal | | Click | $1.50 | Traffic value |
| ROI % | Rating | Recommendation | |-------|--------|----------------| | > 500% | Excellent | Scale budget significantly | | 200-500% | Good | Increase budget moderately | | 100-200% | Acceptable | Optimize before scaling | | 0-100% | Break-even | Review targeting and creative | | < 0% | Negative | Pause and restructure |
| Platform | Average | Good | Excellent | |----------|---------|------|-----------| | Instagram | 1.22% | 3-6% | >6% | | Facebook | 0.07% | 0.5-1% | >1% | | Twitter/X | 0.05% | 0.1-0.5% | >0.5% | | LinkedIn | 2.0% | 3-5% | >5% | | TikTok | 5.96% | 8-15% | >15% |
| Platform | Average | Good | Excellent | |----------|---------|------|-----------| | Instagram | 0.22% | 0.5-1% | >1% | | Facebook | 0.90% | 1.5-2.5% | >2.5% | | LinkedIn | 0.44% | 1-2% | >2% | | TikTok | 0.30% | 0.5-1% | >1% |
| Platform | Average | Good | |----------|---------|------| | Facebook | $0.97 | <$0.50 | | Instagram | $1.20 | <$0.70 | | LinkedIn | $5.26 | <$3.00 | | TikTok | $1.00 | <$0.50 |
See references/platform-benchmarks.md for complete benchmark data.
python scripts/calculate_metrics.py assets/sample_input.json
Calculates engagement rate, CTR, reach rate for each post and campaign totals.
python scripts/analyze_performance.py assets/sample_input.json
Generates full performance analysis with ROI, benchmarks, and recommendations.
Output includes:
See assets/sample_input.json:
{
"platform": "instagram",
"total_spend": 500,
"posts": [
{
"post_id": "post_001",
"content_type": "image",
"likes": 342,
"comments": 28,
"shares": 15,
"saves": 45,
"reach": 5200,
"impressions": 8500,
"clicks": 120
}
]
}
See assets/expected_output.json:
{
"campaign_metrics": {
"total_engagements": 1521,
"avg_engagement_rate": 8.36,
"ctr": 1.55
},
"roi_metrics": {
"total_spend": 500.0,
"cost_per_engagement": 0.33,
"roi_percentage": 660.5
},
"insights": {
"overall_health": "excellent",
"benchmark_comparison": {
"engagement_status": "excellent",
"engagement_benchmark": "1.22%",
"engagement_actual": "8.36%"
}
}
}
The sample campaign shows:
references/platform-benchmarks.md contains:
tools
飞书审批:查询和处理审批待办/已办/实例,搜索可发起审批定义、查看定义详情并发起原生审批实例。当用户要处理审批任务、查看审批实例、搜索或发起审批时使用。审批待办不是飞书任务;非审批类待办走 lark-task。不负责创建审批定义;三方审批定义不走原生提单。
development
Use when a user needs reproducible repository sizing, language composition, file counts, or code-versus-comment ratios with pygount; record exclusions and verify measurement scope before interpreting results.
development
Route a development task to the official Hermes Agent skill, Graphify Codex artifact set, Open GSD Core bundle, or optional GSD Pi bundle without duplicating their installers or state machines.
development
飞书 / Lark 通讯录:按姓名 / 邮箱解析成 open_id,或按 open_id 反查姓名 / 部门 / 邮箱 / 联系方式 / 个人状态 / 签名,以及按关键词搜索当前用户可见的机器人 / 智能体(agent)。当用户提到一个名字要下一步发消息 / 排日程,或拿到 open_id 想查具体信息时使用。不负责部门树遍历、按部门列员工、组织架构图,这类需求走原生 OpenAPI。