openclaw-skills/planning-and-task-breakdown/SKILL.md
Breaks work into ordered tasks. Use when you have a spec or clear requirements and need to break work into implementable tasks. Use when a task feels too large to start, when you need to estimate scope, or when parallel work is possible.
npx skillsauth add seaworld008/commonly-used-high-value-skills planning-and-task-breakdownInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Decompose work into small, verifiable tasks with explicit acceptance criteria. Good task breakdown is the difference between an agent that completes work reliably and one that produces a tangled mess. Every task should be small enough to implement, test, and verify in a single focused session.
When NOT to use: Single-file changes with obvious scope, or when the spec already contains well-defined tasks.
Before writing any code, operate in read-only mode:
Do NOT write code during planning. The output is a plan document saved to tasks/plan.md and a task list saved to tasks/todo.md, not implementation.
Map what depends on what:
Database schema
│
├── API models/types
│ │
│ ├── API endpoints
│ │ │
│ │ └── Frontend API client
│ │ │
│ │ └── UI components
│ │
│ └── Validation logic
│
└── Seed data / migrations
Implementation order follows the dependency graph bottom-up: build foundations first.
Instead of building all the database, then all the API, then all the UI — build one complete feature path at a time:
Bad (horizontal slicing):
Task 1: Build entire database schema
Task 2: Build all API endpoints
Task 3: Build all UI components
Task 4: Connect everything
Good (vertical slicing):
Task 1: User can create an account (schema + API + UI for registration)
Task 2: User can log in (auth schema + API + UI for login)
Task 3: User can create a task (task schema + API + UI for creation)
Task 4: User can view task list (query + API + UI for list view)
Each vertical slice delivers working, testable functionality.
Each task follows this structure:
## Task [N]: [Short descriptive title]
**Description:** One paragraph explaining what this task accomplishes.
**Acceptance criteria:**
- [ ] [Specific, testable condition]
- [ ] [Specific, testable condition]
**Verification:**
- [ ] Tests pass: `npm test -- --grep "feature-name"`
- [ ] Build succeeds: `npm run build`
- [ ] Manual check: [description of what to verify]
**Dependencies:** [Task numbers this depends on, or "None"]
**Files likely touched:**
- `src/path/to/file.ts`
- `tests/path/to/test.ts`
**Estimated scope:** [Small: 1-2 files | Medium: 3-5 files | Large: 5+ files]
Arrange tasks so that:
Add explicit checkpoints:
## Checkpoint: After Tasks 1-3
- [ ] All tests pass
- [ ] Application builds without errors
- [ ] Core user flow works end-to-end
- [ ] Review with human before proceeding
| Size | Files | Scope | Example | |------|-------|-------|---------| | XS | 1 | Single function or config change | Add a validation rule | | S | 1-2 | One component or endpoint | Add a new API endpoint | | M | 3-5 | One feature slice | User registration flow | | L | 5-8 | Multi-component feature | Search with filtering and pagination | | XL | 8+ | Too large — break it down further | — |
If a task is L or larger, it should be broken into smaller tasks. An agent performs best on S and M tasks.
When to break a task down further:
tasks/plan.md.tasks/todo.md.Create the tasks/ directory if it does not exist. These paths are the convention expected by the /build command and other downstream tooling.
# Implementation Plan: [Feature/Project Name]
## Overview
[One paragraph summary of what we're building]
## Architecture Decisions
- [Key decision 1 and rationale]
- [Key decision 2 and rationale]
## Task List
### Phase 1: Foundation
- [ ] Task 1: ...
- [ ] Task 2: ...
### Checkpoint: Foundation
- [ ] Tests pass, builds clean
### Phase 2: Core Features
- [ ] Task 3: ...
- [ ] Task 4: ...
### Checkpoint: Core Features
- [ ] End-to-end flow works
### Phase 3: Polish
- [ ] Task 5: ...
- [ ] Task 6: ...
### Checkpoint: Complete
- [ ] All acceptance criteria met
- [ ] Ready for review
## Risks and Mitigations
| Risk | Impact | Mitigation |
|------|--------|------------|
| [Risk] | [High/Med/Low] | [Strategy] |
## Open Questions
- [Question needing human input]
When multiple agents or sessions are available:
| Rationalization | Reality | |---|---| | "I'll figure it out as I go" | That's how you end up with a tangled mess and rework. 10 minutes of planning saves hours. | | "The tasks are obvious" | Write them down anyway. Explicit tasks surface hidden dependencies and forgotten edge cases. | | "Planning is overhead" | Planning is the task. Implementation without a plan is just typing. | | "I can hold it all in my head" | Context windows are finite. Written plans survive session boundaries and compaction. |
Before starting implementation, confirm:
Acceptance criteria are per-task and answer "did we build the right thing?". They sit on top of the project-wide Definition of Done, the standing bar every task clears before it counts as done. See references/definition-of-done.md.
tools
飞书审批:查询和处理审批待办/已办/实例,搜索可发起审批定义、查看定义详情并发起原生审批实例。当用户要处理审批任务、查看审批实例、搜索或发起审批时使用。审批待办不是飞书任务;非审批类待办走 lark-task。不负责创建审批定义;三方审批定义不走原生提单。
development
Use when a user needs reproducible repository sizing, language composition, file counts, or code-versus-comment ratios with pygount; record exclusions and verify measurement scope before interpreting results.
development
Route a development task to the official Hermes Agent skill, Graphify Codex artifact set, Open GSD Core bundle, or optional GSD Pi bundle without duplicating their installers or state machines.
development
飞书 / Lark 通讯录:按姓名 / 邮箱解析成 open_id,或按 open_id 反查姓名 / 部门 / 邮箱 / 联系方式 / 个人状态 / 签名,以及按关键词搜索当前用户可见的机器人 / 智能体(agent)。当用户提到一个名字要下一步发消息 / 排日程,或拿到 open_id 想查具体信息时使用。不负责部门树遍历、按部门列员工、组织架构图,这类需求走原生 OpenAPI。