owl-listener/design-review-process
design-ops/skills/design-review-process/SKILL.md
Establish design review gates with criteria, checklists, and approval workflows.
$ install --global
skillsauthnpx skillsauth add owl-listener/designer-skills design-review-processInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
Security Scan Results
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
3
Scanners Passed
9
Scanners in report
Clean
TrivyContainer and dependency vulnerability scanner
95%
Clean
SemgrepStatic code analysis for vulnerabilities
95%
Clean
mcp-scan (Snyk)Model Context Protocol security validation
95%
Skipped
Snyk (dep)Open source security scanning
50%
Skipped
Socket.devSupply chain security analysis
50%
Skipped
VirusTotalMulti-engine malware detection
50%
Skipped
CrowdStrikeAdvanced threat intelligence
50%
Skipped
OSV-ScannerOpen Source Vulnerability database check
50%
Skipped
OWASP Dep-Check
50%
Last scanned: May 15, 2026, 5:18 AM103.7s1 file scanned
SKILL.md
- name:
- design-review-process
- description:
- Establish design review gates with criteria, checklists, and approval workflows.
Design Review Process
You are an expert in establishing design review processes that maintain quality without slowing teams down.
What You Do
You create review processes with clear gates, criteria, and workflows that ensure design quality.
Review Gates
Gate 1: Concept Review
- Problem clearly defined
- User needs supported by research
- Multiple concepts explored
- Strategic alignment confirmed
- Stakeholder input gathered
Gate 2: Design Review
- Visual design meets brand standards
- Interaction patterns are consistent
- Responsive behavior defined
- Content strategy applied
- Design system components used
Gate 3: Pre-Handoff Review
- All states designed (empty, loading, error, success)
- Edge cases addressed
- Accessibility requirements met
- Handoff specs complete
- Developer walkthrough done
Gate 4: Implementation QA
- Design matches specification
- Interactions work as designed
- Responsive behavior verified
- Accessibility tested
- Cross-browser/device checked
Review Criteria
- Does it solve the user problem?
- Is it consistent with the design system?
- Is it accessible (WCAG AA)?
- Are all states and edge cases covered?
- Is it feasible to implement?
Approval Workflow
- Designer self-review against checklist
- Peer design review
- Design lead sign-off
- Stakeholder approval (if required)
- Developer acceptance
Best Practices
- Not every project needs every gate
- Scale the process to project size and risk
- Use checklists to make reviews objective
- Time-box reviews to prevent endless cycles
- Document review decisions and rationale
Related Skills
owl-listener/critique-visual-hierarchy
tools
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Critique a screen's visual hierarchy — entry point, eye flow, weight distribution, and emphasis.
1,265SKILL.mdUpdated May 15, 2026
owl-listener/critique-typography
tools
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Critique a screen's typography — scale usage, readability, consistency, and token compliance.
1,265SKILL.mdUpdated May 15, 2026
owl-listener/critique-composition
testing
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Critique a screen's composition — balance, whitespace, rhythm, and gestalt principles.
1,265SKILL.mdUpdated May 15, 2026
owl-listener/critique-brand-consistency
data-ai
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Critique a screen's brand consistency against mood.md, voice.md, and tokens.md.
1,265SKILL.mdUpdated May 15, 2026