skills/skill-finish-branch/SKILL.md
Wrap up a branch — run tests, create PR, merge or discard — use when implementation is done
npx skillsauth add nyldn/claude-octopus skill-finish-branchInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Host: Codex CLI — This skill was designed for Claude Code and adapted for Codex. Cross-reference commands use installed skill names in Codex rather than
/octo:*slash commands. Use the active Codex shell and subagent tools. Do not claim a provider, model, or host subagent is available until the current session exposes it. For host tool equivalents, seeskills/blocks/codex-host-adapter.md.
This generated Codex skill preserves an enforced workflow contract from the source skill.
PROHIBITED:
Your first output line MUST be: 🐙 **CLAUDE OCTOPUS ACTIVATED** - Branch Completion
Full ship pipeline: tests → multi-provider review → version bump → changelog → commit → push → PR.
Core principle: Verify tests → Review diff → Bump version → Update changelog → Present options → Execute choice → Clean up.
Before anything else, verify tests pass:
# Detect and run project's test suite
if [[ -f "package.json" ]]; then npm test
elif [[ -f "pytest.ini" ]] || [[ -f "pyproject.toml" ]]; then pytest
elif [[ -f "Cargo.toml" ]]; then cargo test
elif [[ -f "go.mod" ]]; then go test ./...
elif [[ -f "Makefile" ]] && grep -q '^test:' Makefile; then make test
fi
If tests fail: STOP. Show failures. Do not proceed.
If tests pass: Continue to Step 2.
Run a quick multi-provider review of the changes before shipping. This catches issues before they reach PR reviewers.
# Get the diff summary
DIFF_STAT=$(git diff --stat $(git merge-base HEAD main)..HEAD)
DIFF_FILES=$(git diff --name-only $(git merge-base HEAD main)..HEAD)
Always run a quick review — this is automatic, not optional:
# Quick review via orchestrate.sh (uses available providers)
${HOME}/.claude-octopus/plugin/scripts/orchestrate.sh spawn reviewer "Review this diff for bugs, security issues, and code quality problems. Be concise — only flag real issues, not style preferences.
$(git diff $(git merge-base HEAD main)..HEAD | head -500)"
If critical issues found: Present them and ask whether to fix or ship anyway.
If clean: Continue to Step 3. Show a brief ✓ Review clean — no issues found.
# Identify the base branch
BASE_BRANCH=$(git remote show origin 2>/dev/null | grep 'HEAD branch' | awk '{print $NF}')
[[ -z "$BASE_BRANCH" ]] && BASE_BRANCH="main"
# Check for VERSION file
VERSION_FILE=""
for f in VERSION version.txt package.json; do
[[ -f "$f" ]] && VERSION_FILE="$f" && break
done
If a VERSION file or package.json exists, offer to bump:
AskUserQuestion({
questions: [{
question: "Version bump?",
header: "Version",
multiSelect: false,
options: [
{label: "Patch (Recommended)", description: "Bug fixes, minor changes (1.2.3 → 1.2.4)"},
{label: "Minor", description: "New features, backward compatible (1.2.3 → 1.3.0)"},
{label: "Major", description: "Breaking changes (1.2.3 → 2.0.0)"},
{label: "Skip", description: "Don't bump version"}
]
}]
})
If bumping: Update the version file and prepend a changelog entry summarizing the diff:
# Generate changelog entry from commits
COMMITS=$(git log --oneline $(git merge-base HEAD $BASE_BRANCH)..HEAD)
# Prepend to CHANGELOG.md if it exists
Present exactly these 4 options:
✅ Ship ready. Tests passing. Review clean. What would you like to do?
1. **Create PR** (Recommended) - Push and create a Pull Request for review
2. **Merge locally** - Merge back to <base-branch> on this machine
3. **Keep as-is** - Leave the branch, I'll handle it later
4. **Discard** - Delete this work permanently
Which option? (1-4)
Keep options concise. Don't add explanations unless asked.
# Get current branch name
FEATURE_BRANCH=$(git branch --show-current)
BASE_BRANCH="main" # or detected base
# Switch to base branch
git checkout $BASE_BRANCH
# Pull latest
git pull origin $BASE_BRANCH
# Merge feature branch
git merge $FEATURE_BRANCH
# Verify tests on merged result
npm test # or appropriate test command
# If tests pass, delete feature branch
git branch -d $FEATURE_BRANCH
Report:
✅ Merged $FEATURE_BRANCH into $BASE_BRANCH
✅ Tests pass on merged result
✅ Feature branch deleted
Ready to push when you want: git push origin $BASE_BRANCH
# Get branch info
FEATURE_BRANCH=$(git branch --show-current)
# Push branch
git push -u origin $FEATURE_BRANCH
# Create PR with description
gh pr create \
--title "feat: [description]" \
--body "$(cat <<'EOF'
## Summary
- [What changed]
- [Why it changed]
## Test Plan
- [x] Unit tests pass
- [x] Manual verification done
- [ ] Code review needed
EOF
)"
Report:
✅ Branch pushed to origin/$FEATURE_BRANCH
✅ PR created: https://github.com/owner/repo/pull/123
Branch preserved for review process.
✅ Keeping branch $FEATURE_BRANCH as-is.
Current state:
- Branch: $FEATURE_BRANCH
- Commits ahead of $BASE_BRANCH: N
- Tests: Passing
When ready, you can:
- Merge: git checkout main && git merge $FEATURE_BRANCH
- PR: git push -u origin $FEATURE_BRANCH && gh pr create
- Discard: git branch -D $FEATURE_BRANCH
Do NOT clean up anything.
Confirm first (REQUIRED):
⚠️ This will PERMANENTLY delete:
- Branch: $FEATURE_BRANCH
- All commits:
- abc1234 feat: add user validation
- def5678 fix: handle edge case
- ghi9012 test: add integration tests
Type 'discard' to confirm, or anything else to cancel.
Wait for exact confirmation: discard
If confirmed:
# Switch to base branch first
git checkout $BASE_BRANCH
# Force delete the feature branch
git branch -D $FEATURE_BRANCH
# If remote exists, delete it too (with confirmation)
git push origin --delete $FEATURE_BRANCH 2>/dev/null || true
Report:
✅ Branch $FEATURE_BRANCH deleted locally
✅ Remote branch deleted (if existed)
Work has been permanently discarded.
For Options 1, 2, 4: Check if in a worktree and clean up:
# Check if current directory is a worktree
if git worktree list | grep -q "$(pwd)"; then
# Get worktree path
WORKTREE_PATH=$(pwd)
# Switch to main worktree
cd $(git worktree list | head -1 | awk '{print $1}')
# Remove the worktree
git worktree remove "$WORKTREE_PATH"
echo "✅ Worktree cleaned up"
fi
For Option 3: Keep worktree intact.
| Option | Merge | Push | Keep Branch | Cleanup | |--------|-------|------|-------------|---------| | 1. Merge locally | ✓ | - | Delete | ✓ | | 2. Create PR | - | ✓ | Keep | - | | 3. Keep as-is | - | - | Keep | - | | 4. Discard | - | - | Delete | ✓ |
After completing octopus workflows, use this skill:
# After tangle (develop) phase completes successfully
# After ink (deliver) phase validates the work
# User says: "I'm done, create a PR"
# → Invoke finishing-branch skill
# → Verify tests
# → Present options
# → Execute Option 2 (Create PR)
# Run octopus validation before finishing
${HOME}/.claude-octopus/plugin/scripts/orchestrate.sh ink "Validate before merge"
# If validation passes, proceed with finishing-branch
| Action | Why It's Dangerous | |--------|-------------------| | Merge without testing | Ships broken code | | Skip confirmation for discard | Loses work permanently | | Force-push without asking | Destroys history | | Delete remote branch silently | Affects collaborators | | Proceed when tests fail | Corrupts main branch |
| Mistake | Fix | |---------|-----| | Offering options before testing | Always verify tests FIRST | | Auto-merging without asking | Present 4 options, let user choose | | Deleting without confirmation | Require typed "discard" | | Cleaning up worktree on "keep" | Only cleanup for options 1, 2, 4 |
Finishing branch → Tests verified AND user chose option
Otherwise → Not complete
Verify tests. Present options. Execute safely. Clean up appropriately.
testing
Run a configurable multi-LLM council with personas, budget caps, synthesis, veto gates, and optional implementation handoff.
data-ai
Evidence before claims — run verification commands before declaring work complete, fixed, or passing
testing
Evidence before claims — run verification commands before declaring work complete, fixed, or passing
development
Structured four-way AI debates between Claude, Sonnet, Gemini, and Codex — use for critical decisions