skills/detecting-indirect-prompt-injection/SKILL.md
Detect and defend against indirect prompt injection hidden in web pages, documents, and images consumed by an agent, via content extraction (HTML/PDF/OCR), normalization, and scanning with LLM Guard's PromptInjection scanner or Hugging Face Prompt Guard 2. Use when an agent ingests untrusted external content and you need to screen it for injected instructions before the LLM processes it.
npx skillsauth add mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills detecting-indirect-prompt-injectionInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Authorized-use-only notice: Scripts in this skill scan untrusted content for injection payloads and run detector models. Run scanning only on data you are authorized to process, and treat any extracted payloads as live untrusted input — never paste them back into a privileged LLM context.
Indirect prompt injection (MITRE ATLAS AML.T0051.001, OWASP LLM01:2025) occurs when an LLM-powered agent ingests external content — a web page it browses, a PDF or email it summarizes, an image it OCRs, a tool result it reads — and that content contains hidden instructions the model then follows as if they came from the developer or user. Because the agent treats all tokens in its context window as equally authoritative, an attacker who controls any consumed artifact can hijack the agent's behavior: exfiltrate conversation history, redirect tool calls, leak secrets, or pivot through connected systems.
Unlike direct injection (the user types the attack), indirect injection arrives through a trusted-looking data channel, which is why naive input filtering misses it. Payloads hide in many forms: HTML comments and display:none/zero-width text on web pages, white-on-white or tiny-font text in PDFs, alt-text and EXIF metadata in images, text rendered into pixels (invisible to OCR-light filters but read by multimodal models), Unicode tag/zero-width characters, and Base64/ROT13 obfuscation. This skill builds a detection pipeline that normalizes and scans every artifact before it reaches the model, combining heuristic/regex detection, dedicated detector models (Meta Prompt Guard 2, ProtectAI's deberta-v3 prompt-injection classifier via LLM Guard), and multimodal extraction for images, and then defines response actions and detection telemetry.
python -m venv .venv && source .venv/bin/activate
# LLM Guard — input/output scanners incl. PromptInjection
pip install llm-guard
# Hugging Face transformers for Prompt Guard 2 / deberta classifiers
pip install transformers torch
# Content extraction: HTML, PDF, images
pip install beautifulsoup4 pypdf pillow pytesseract
# pytesseract requires the Tesseract OCR engine:
# Debian/Ubuntu: sudo apt-get install -y tesseract-ocr
# macOS: brew install tesseract
# Windows: choco install tesseract
meta-llama/Llama-Prompt-Guard-2-86M on Hugging Face, or use the open protectai/deberta-v3-base-prompt-injection-v2 classifier.| ID | Official Name | Relevance | |----|---------------|-----------| | AML.T0051.001 | LLM Prompt Injection: Indirect | The exact technique this skill detects and mitigates | | AML.T0051 | LLM Prompt Injection | Parent technique covering all prompt-injection variants | | AML.T0057 | LLM Data Leakage | Common objective of an indirect injection that this detection prevents | | AML.T0053 | LLM Plugin Compromise | Injected instructions frequently target the agent's tools/plugins |
Pull comments, hidden elements, and metadata that a human never sees but the model does.
# extract_html.py
from bs4 import BeautifulSoup, Comment
def extract_hidden(html: str):
soup = BeautifulSoup(html, "html.parser")
hidden = []
for c in soup.find_all(string=lambda t: isinstance(t, Comment)):
hidden.append(("comment", c.strip()))
for el in soup.select('[style*="display:none"],[style*="visibility:hidden"],[hidden]'):
hidden.append(("css-hidden", el.get_text(strip=True)))
for img in soup.find_all("img"):
if img.get("alt"):
hidden.append(("alt-text", img["alt"]))
return [h for h in hidden if h[1]]
Strip zero-width / Unicode-tag characters and decode common encodings so detectors see the real payload.
# normalize.py
import base64, codecs, re, unicodedata
ZERO_WIDTH = dict.fromkeys(map(ord, ""), None)
TAG_RANGE = range(0xE0000, 0xE0080) # Unicode tag chars used to smuggle text
def normalize(text: str) -> str:
text = text.translate(ZERO_WIDTH)
text = "".join(ch for ch in text if ord(ch) not in TAG_RANGE)
text = unicodedata.normalize("NFKC", text)
for token in re.findall(r"[A-Za-z0-9+/=]{20,}", text):
try:
decoded = base64.b64decode(token).decode("utf-8", "ignore")
if decoded.isprintable():
text += f"\n[decoded-b64] {decoded}"
except Exception:
pass
text += "\n[decoded-rot13] " + codecs.decode(text, "rot_13")
return text
LLM Guard wraps a transformer classifier and returns a risk score per input.
# scan_llmguard.py
from llm_guard.input_scanners import PromptInjection
from llm_guard.input_scanners.prompt_injection import MatchType
scanner = PromptInjection(threshold=0.5, match_type=MatchType.FULL)
def scan(text: str):
sanitized, is_valid, risk = scanner.scan(text)
return {"is_valid": is_valid, "risk": risk} # is_valid=False => injection detected
Run Meta Prompt Guard 2 (or the open ProtectAI deberta classifier) for a second opinion.
# detector_model.py
from transformers import pipeline
# Open classifier (no gating); swap to meta-llama/Llama-Prompt-Guard-2-86M if licensed
clf = pipeline("text-classification",
model="protectai/deberta-v3-base-prompt-injection-v2")
def is_injection(text: str, threshold: float = 0.5) -> bool:
out = clf(text[:512])[0]
return out["label"].upper() == "INJECTION" and out["score"] >= threshold
Multimodal agents read text painted into pixels; OCR it and run the same scanners.
# scan_image.py
from PIL import Image
import pytesseract
def ocr(path: str) -> str:
return pytesseract.image_to_string(Image.open(path))
# Feed ocr(path) through normalize() + scan() + is_injection()
Combine signals into block / sanitize / allow, and log a structured event for the SIEM.
# decide.py
import json, hashlib
from datetime import datetime, timezone
def decide(source, raw, normalized, llmguard_invalid, model_flag):
flagged = llmguard_invalid or model_flag
event = {
"ts": datetime.now(timezone.utc).isoformat(),
"source": source,
"sha256": hashlib.sha256(raw.encode("utf-8", "ignore")).hexdigest(),
"atlas": "AML.T0051.001",
"llmguard_injection": llmguard_invalid,
"model_injection": model_flag,
"decision": "block" if flagged else "allow",
}
print(json.dumps(event))
return event["decision"]
Run the pipeline over a labeled set of clean + injected artifacts, measure precision/recall, and tune threshold to balance false positives against missed injections. Re-test whenever the agent's model or ingestion sources change.
| Tool | Purpose | Source | |------|---------|--------| | LLM Guard | Input/output scanners incl. PromptInjection | https://github.com/protectai/llm-guard | | Meta Prompt Guard 2 | Dedicated jailbreak/injection classifier | https://huggingface.co/meta-llama/Llama-Prompt-Guard-2-86M | | ProtectAI deberta-v3 | Open prompt-injection classifier | https://huggingface.co/protectai/deberta-v3-base-prompt-injection-v2 | | BeautifulSoup4 | HTML parsing / hidden-element extraction | https://www.crummy.com/software/BeautifulSoup/ | | pytesseract / Tesseract | OCR text from images | https://github.com/madmaze/pytesseract | | MITRE ATLAS | AI threat technique taxonomy | https://atlas.mitre.org/ | | OWASP LLM01:2025 | Prompt Injection reference | https://genai.owasp.org/llmrisk/llm01-prompt-injection/ |
| Surface | Hiding technique | Extraction step | |---------|------------------|-----------------| | Web page | HTML comments, display:none, alt-text | BeautifulSoup hidden-element pass | | PDF | white/tiny font, off-page text | pypdf text extraction + normalize | | Image | rendered pixels, EXIF, alt-text | OCR + metadata read | | Any text | zero-width / Unicode-tag chars | normalize() de-obfuscation | | Any text | Base64 / ROT13 encoding | decode pass in normalize() |
tools
Executes authorized phishing simulation campaigns to assess an organization's susceptibility to email-based social engineering attacks. The tester designs realistic phishing scenarios, builds credential harvesting infrastructure, sends targeted phishing emails, and tracks open rates, click-through rates, and credential submission rates to measure human security awareness. Activates for requests involving phishing simulation, social engineering assessment, email security testing, or security awareness measurement.
development
Drive a federal system through the NIST Risk Management Framework (SP 800-37 Rev 2) to an Authorization to Operate (ATO): Prepare, Categorize (FIPS 199), Select a control baseline (FIPS 200 / SP 800-53 Rev 5), Implement, Assess (SP 800-53A), Authorize, and Monitor continuously. Use when a system needs an ATO or a renewal, when working a FISMA/FedRAMP authorization package, when building or reviewing an SSP, SAR, or POA&M, when categorizing a system as Low/Moderate/High impact, when selecting or tailoring a control baseline, or when standing up continuous monitoring (ConMon) after authorization. Covers ATO, conditional ATO (cATO), and the artifacts assessors expect. Keywords: NIST RMF, 800-37, ATO, authorization to operate, FISMA, FedRAMP, SSP, SAR, POA&M, FIPS 199, FIPS 200, 800-53, 800-53A, control baseline, security categorization, continuous monitoring, authorizing official, system boundary, ongoing authorization.
development
Executes authorized attack simulations against Active Directory environments to identify misconfigurations, weak credentials, dangerous privilege paths, and exploitable trust relationships that could lead to domain compromise. The tester uses BloodHound for attack path analysis, Mimikatz for credential extraction, and Impacket for protocol-level attacks including Kerberoasting, AS-REP Roasting, and delegation abuse. Activates for requests involving Active Directory pentest, AD attack simulation, domain compromise testing, or Kerberos attack assessment.
tools
Evaluates and selects Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) products based on organizational requirements including feed integration capability, STIX/TAXII support, workflow automation, analyst interface, and total cost of ownership. Use when conducting a TIP procurement, migrating between TIP solutions, or assessing whether the current TIP meets program maturity requirements. Activates for requests involving ThreatConnect, MISP, OpenCTI, Anomali, EclecticIQ, or TIP procurement decisions.