mukul975/detecting-azure-lateral-movement
skills/detecting-azure-lateral-movement/SKILL.md
Detect lateral movement in Azure AD/Entra ID environments using Microsoft Graph API audit logs, Azure Sentinel KQL hunting queries, and sign-in anomaly correlation to identify privilege escalation, token theft, and cross-tenant pivoting.
$ install --global
skillsauthnpx skillsauth add mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills detecting-azure-lateral-movementInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
Security Scan Results
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
3
Scanners Passed
9
Scanners in report
Clean
TrivyContainer and dependency vulnerability scanner
95%
Clean
SemgrepStatic code analysis for vulnerabilities
95%
Clean
mcp-scan (Snyk)Model Context Protocol security validation
95%
Skipped
Snyk (dep)Open source security scanning
50%
Skipped
Socket.devSupply chain security analysis
50%
Skipped
VirusTotalMulti-engine malware detection
50%
Skipped
CrowdStrikeAdvanced threat intelligence
50%
Skipped
OSV-ScannerOpen Source Vulnerability database check
50%
Skipped
OWASP Dep-Check
50%
Last scanned: Jun 6, 2026, 5:12 AM286.5s3 files scanned
SKILL.md
- name:
- detecting-azure-lateral-movement
- description:
- Detect lateral movement in Azure AD/Entra ID environments using Microsoft
- domain:
- cybersecurity
- subdomain:
- cloud-security
- version:
- 1.0
- author:
- mahipal
- license:
- Apache-2.0
Detecting Azure Lateral Movement
Overview
Lateral movement in Azure AD/Entra ID differs from on-premises environments. Attackers pivot through OAuth application consent grants, service principal abuse, cross-tenant access policies, and stolen refresh tokens rather than SMB/RDP connections. Detection requires correlating Microsoft Graph API audit logs, Azure AD sign-in logs, and Entra ID protection risk events using KQL queries in Microsoft Sentinel. This skill covers building detection analytics for common Azure lateral movement techniques including application impersonation, mailbox delegation abuse, and conditional access policy bypasses.
When to Use
- When investigating security incidents that require detecting azure lateral movement
- When building detection rules or threat hunting queries for this domain
- When SOC analysts need structured procedures for this analysis type
- When validating security monitoring coverage for related attack techniques
Prerequisites
- Azure subscription with Microsoft Sentinel workspace configured
- Azure AD P2 or Entra ID P2 license for risk-based sign-in detection
- Microsoft Graph API permissions: AuditLog.Read.All, Directory.Read.All, SecurityEvents.Read.All
- Log Analytics workspace ingesting AuditLogs, SigninLogs, and AADServicePrincipalSignInLogs
- Familiarity with KQL (Kusto Query Language)
Steps
Step 1: Configure Log Ingestion
Enable diagnostic settings to stream Azure AD logs to Log Analytics:
- Sign-in logs (interactive and non-interactive)
- Audit logs (directory changes, app consent)
- Service principal sign-in logs
- Provisioning logs
- Risky users and risk detections
Step 2: Build Detection Queries
Create KQL analytics rules in Sentinel for:
- Unusual service principal credential additions
- OAuth application consent grants to unknown apps
- Cross-tenant sign-ins from new tenants
- Token replay from different IP/user-agent combinations
- Mailbox delegation changes (FullAccess, SendAs)
Step 3: Correlate Events
Chain multiple low-confidence indicators into high-confidence lateral movement detections by correlating sign-in anomalies with directory changes within time windows.
Step 4: Automate Response
Create Sentinel playbooks (Logic Apps) to automatically revoke suspicious OAuth grants, disable compromised service principals, and enforce step-up authentication.
Expected Output
JSON report containing detected lateral movement indicators, correlated event chains, affected identities, and recommended containment actions with MITRE ATT&CK technique mappings.
Related Skills
mukul975/executing-phishing-simulation-campaign
tools
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Executes authorized phishing simulation campaigns to assess an organization's susceptibility to email-based social engineering attacks. The tester designs realistic phishing scenarios, builds credential harvesting infrastructure, sends targeted phishing emails, and tracks open rates, click-through rates, and credential submission rates to measure human security awareness. Activates for requests involving phishing simulation, social engineering assessment, email security testing, or security awareness measurement.
30,389SKILL.mdUpdated Aug 21, 2026
mukul975/executing-nist-rmf-authorization-to-operate
development
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Drive a federal system through the NIST Risk Management Framework (SP 800-37 Rev 2) to an Authorization to Operate (ATO): Prepare, Categorize (FIPS 199), Select a control baseline (FIPS 200 / SP 800-53 Rev 5), Implement, Assess (SP 800-53A), Authorize, and Monitor continuously. Use when a system needs an ATO or a renewal, when working a FISMA/FedRAMP authorization package, when building or reviewing an SSP, SAR, or POA&M, when categorizing a system as Low/Moderate/High impact, when selecting or tailoring a control baseline, or when standing up continuous monitoring (ConMon) after authorization. Covers ATO, conditional ATO (cATO), and the artifacts assessors expect. Keywords: NIST RMF, 800-37, ATO, authorization to operate, FISMA, FedRAMP, SSP, SAR, POA&M, FIPS 199, FIPS 200, 800-53, 800-53A, control baseline, security categorization, continuous monitoring, authorizing official, system boundary, ongoing authorization.
30,389SKILL.mdUpdated Aug 21, 2026
mukul975/executing-active-directory-attack-simulation
development
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Executes authorized attack simulations against Active Directory environments to identify misconfigurations, weak credentials, dangerous privilege paths, and exploitable trust relationships that could lead to domain compromise. The tester uses BloodHound for attack path analysis, Mimikatz for credential extraction, and Impacket for protocol-level attacks including Kerberoasting, AS-REP Roasting, and delegation abuse. Activates for requests involving Active Directory pentest, AD attack simulation, domain compromise testing, or Kerberos attack assessment.
30,389SKILL.mdUpdated Aug 21, 2026
mukul975/evaluating-threat-intelligence-platforms
tools
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Evaluates and selects Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) products based on organizational requirements including feed integration capability, STIX/TAXII support, workflow automation, analyst interface, and total cost of ownership. Use when conducting a TIP procurement, migrating between TIP solutions, or assessing whether the current TIP meets program maturity requirements. Activates for requests involving ThreatConnect, MISP, OpenCTI, Anomali, EclecticIQ, or TIP procurement decisions.
30,389SKILL.mdUpdated Aug 21, 2026