skills/deploying-decoy-files-for-ransomware-detection/SKILL.md
Deploys canary files (honeytokens) across file systems to detect ransomware encryption activity in real time. Uses strategically placed decoy documents monitored via file integrity monitoring or OS-level watchdogs to trigger alerts when ransomware modifies or encrypts them. Activates for requests involving ransomware canary deployment, honeyfile setup, deception-based ransomware detection, or file integrity monitoring for encryption.
npx skillsauth add mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills deploying-decoy-files-for-ransomware-detectionInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Do not use decoy files as the sole ransomware defense. They are a detection mechanism, not a prevention mechanism, and should complement backups, EDR, and access controls.
watchdog library for cross-platform file system monitoringPlan file placement for maximum detection coverage:
Canary File Placement Strategy:
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Naming Convention:
- Use names that sort FIRST and LAST alphabetically in each directory
- Ransomware typically enumerates directories A-Z or Z-A
- Examples: _AAAA_budget_2024.docx, ~zzzz_report_final.xlsx
Placement Locations:
- Root of every file share (\\server\share\_AAAA_canary.docx)
- Desktop, Documents, Downloads on each endpoint
- Department-specific shares (Finance, HR, Legal)
- Backup staging directories
- Home directories of high-privilege accounts
File Types:
- .docx, .xlsx, .pdf (most targeted by ransomware)
- .sql, .bak (database files, high value)
- Mix of file types to detect ransomware that targets specific extensions
Create decoy files with realistic content and metadata:
import os
import time
def create_canary_docx(filepath, content="Q4 Financial Summary - Confidential"):
"""Create a realistic .docx canary file using python-docx."""
from docx import Document
doc = Document()
doc.add_heading("Financial Report - CONFIDENTIAL", level=1)
doc.add_paragraph(content)
doc.add_paragraph(f"Generated: {time.strftime('%Y-%m-%d')}")
doc.save(filepath)
def create_canary_txt(filepath):
"""Create a simple text canary with known content for hash verification."""
content = "CANARY_TOKEN_DO_NOT_MODIFY\n"
content += f"Created: {time.strftime('%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S')}\n"
content += "This file is monitored for unauthorized changes.\n"
with open(filepath, "w") as f:
f.write(content)
Monitor canary files for any modification, rename, or deletion:
from watchdog.observers import Observer
from watchdog.events import FileSystemEventHandler
class CanaryHandler(FileSystemEventHandler):
def __init__(self, canary_paths, alert_callback):
self.canary_paths = set(canary_paths)
self.alert_callback = alert_callback
def on_modified(self, event):
if event.src_path in self.canary_paths:
self.alert_callback("MODIFIED", event.src_path)
def on_deleted(self, event):
if event.src_path in self.canary_paths:
self.alert_callback("DELETED", event.src_path)
def on_moved(self, event):
if event.src_path in self.canary_paths:
self.alert_callback("RENAMED", event.src_path)
Define automated responses when canary files are triggered:
Alert Response Matrix:
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Event: Canary MODIFIED
→ Severity: CRITICAL
→ Action: Alert SOC, identify modifying process (PID), isolate endpoint
Event: Canary DELETED
→ Severity: HIGH
→ Action: Alert SOC, check for ransomware note in same directory
Event: Canary RENAMED (new extension added)
→ Severity: CRITICAL
→ Action: Alert SOC, check extension against known ransomware extensions
→ Automated: Kill modifying process, disable network interface
Event: Multiple canaries triggered within 60 seconds
→ Severity: EMERGENCY
→ Action: Network-wide isolation, activate incident response plan
Test that canary files detect actual ransomware behavior:
# Simulate ransomware encryption (safe test - modifies canary content)
echo "ENCRYPTED_BY_TEST" > /path/to/canary/_AAAA_budget.docx
# Simulate ransomware rename (adds extension)
mv /path/to/canary/report.xlsx /path/to/canary/report.xlsx.locked
# Verify alerts were generated in SIEM/alerting system
| Term | Definition | |------|------------| | Canary File | A decoy file placed in a directory that is monitored for any access or modification, serving as a tripwire for unauthorized activity | | Honeytoken | A broader category of deception artifacts (files, credentials, database records) designed to alert when accessed | | File Integrity Monitoring | Continuous monitoring of file attributes (hash, size, permissions, timestamps) to detect unauthorized changes | | ReadDirectoryChangesW | Windows API for monitoring file system changes in a directory; used by the watchdog library on Windows | | inotify | Linux kernel subsystem for monitoring file system events; provides near-instant notification of file changes |
tools
Executes authorized phishing simulation campaigns to assess an organization's susceptibility to email-based social engineering attacks. The tester designs realistic phishing scenarios, builds credential harvesting infrastructure, sends targeted phishing emails, and tracks open rates, click-through rates, and credential submission rates to measure human security awareness. Activates for requests involving phishing simulation, social engineering assessment, email security testing, or security awareness measurement.
development
Drive a federal system through the NIST Risk Management Framework (SP 800-37 Rev 2) to an Authorization to Operate (ATO): Prepare, Categorize (FIPS 199), Select a control baseline (FIPS 200 / SP 800-53 Rev 5), Implement, Assess (SP 800-53A), Authorize, and Monitor continuously. Use when a system needs an ATO or a renewal, when working a FISMA/FedRAMP authorization package, when building or reviewing an SSP, SAR, or POA&M, when categorizing a system as Low/Moderate/High impact, when selecting or tailoring a control baseline, or when standing up continuous monitoring (ConMon) after authorization. Covers ATO, conditional ATO (cATO), and the artifacts assessors expect. Keywords: NIST RMF, 800-37, ATO, authorization to operate, FISMA, FedRAMP, SSP, SAR, POA&M, FIPS 199, FIPS 200, 800-53, 800-53A, control baseline, security categorization, continuous monitoring, authorizing official, system boundary, ongoing authorization.
development
Executes authorized attack simulations against Active Directory environments to identify misconfigurations, weak credentials, dangerous privilege paths, and exploitable trust relationships that could lead to domain compromise. The tester uses BloodHound for attack path analysis, Mimikatz for credential extraction, and Impacket for protocol-level attacks including Kerberoasting, AS-REP Roasting, and delegation abuse. Activates for requests involving Active Directory pentest, AD attack simulation, domain compromise testing, or Kerberos attack assessment.
tools
Evaluates and selects Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) products based on organizational requirements including feed integration capability, STIX/TAXII support, workflow automation, analyst interface, and total cost of ownership. Use when conducting a TIP procurement, migrating between TIP solutions, or assessing whether the current TIP meets program maturity requirements. Activates for requests involving ThreatConnect, MISP, OpenCTI, Anomali, EclecticIQ, or TIP procurement decisions.