skills/building-vulnerability-exception-tracking-system/SKILL.md
Build a vulnerability exception and risk acceptance tracking system covering approval workflows, compensating controls documentation, and automatic expiration for vulnerabilities that miss SLA remediation timelines. Use when standing up a governance process for risk acceptance and exception approvals to support PCI DSS, SOC 2, or NIST CSF compliance.
npx skillsauth add mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills building-vulnerability-exception-tracking-systemInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
A vulnerability exception tracking system manages cases where vulnerabilities cannot be remediated within SLA timelines. It provides structured workflows for requesting exceptions, documenting compensating controls, obtaining risk acceptance approvals, and automatically expiring exceptions when their validity period ends. This ensures organizations maintain visibility into accepted risks while complying with frameworks like PCI DSS, SOC 2, and NIST CSF.
flask, sqlalchemy, requests, jinja2| Category | Description | Max Duration | Approver Level | |----------|------------|-------------|----------------| | Remediation Delay | Patch available but deployment blocked | 30 days | Team Lead + Security | | No Fix Available | Vendor has not released a patch | 90 days | Security Director | | Business Critical | System cannot be patched without outage | 60 days | VP Engineering + CISO | | False Positive | Finding is not a real vulnerability | Permanent | Security Analyst | | Compensating Control | Alternative mitigation in place | 180 days | Security Architect |
exception_schema = {
"cve_id": "CVE-2024-XXXX",
"finding_id": "unique-finding-reference",
"asset_hostname": "prod-db-01.corp.local",
"severity": "high",
"cvss_score": 8.1,
"category": "remediation_delay",
"justification": "Database upgrade required before patch can be applied",
"compensating_controls": [
"WAF rule blocking exploit pattern deployed",
"Network segmentation restricting access to trusted VLANs only",
"Enhanced monitoring via Splunk alert for exploitation indicators"
],
"requested_expiration": "2024-06-15",
"requestor_email": "[email protected]",
"approver_emails": ["[email protected]", "[email protected]"],
"risk_rating": "medium",
}
CREATE TABLE vulnerability_exceptions (
id SERIAL PRIMARY KEY,
cve_id VARCHAR(20) NOT NULL,
finding_id VARCHAR(100) NOT NULL,
asset_hostname VARCHAR(255),
severity VARCHAR(20),
cvss_score DECIMAL(3,1),
category VARCHAR(50) NOT NULL,
justification TEXT NOT NULL,
compensating_controls TEXT,
status VARCHAR(20) DEFAULT 'pending',
requested_by VARCHAR(255) NOT NULL,
approved_by VARCHAR(255),
requested_at TIMESTAMP DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP,
approved_at TIMESTAMP,
expires_at TIMESTAMP NOT NULL,
expired BOOLEAN DEFAULT FALSE,
risk_rating VARCHAR(20),
review_notes TEXT,
created_at TIMESTAMP DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP,
updated_at TIMESTAMP DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP
);
CREATE TABLE exception_audit_log (
id SERIAL PRIMARY KEY,
exception_id INTEGER REFERENCES vulnerability_exceptions(id),
action VARCHAR(50) NOT NULL,
actor VARCHAR(255) NOT NULL,
details TEXT,
created_at TIMESTAMP DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP
);
CREATE INDEX idx_exception_status ON vulnerability_exceptions(status);
CREATE INDEX idx_exception_expires ON vulnerability_exceptions(expires_at);
CREATE INDEX idx_exception_cve ON vulnerability_exceptions(cve_id);
from flask import Flask, request, jsonify
from datetime import datetime, timezone
import json
app = Flask(__name__)
@app.route("/api/exceptions", methods=["POST"])
def create_exception():
data = request.json
required = ["cve_id", "finding_id", "category", "justification", "expires_at", "requestor_email"]
for field in required:
if field not in data:
return jsonify({"error": f"Missing required field: {field}"}), 400
# Validate expiration does not exceed category maximum
max_days = {"remediation_delay": 30, "no_fix": 90, "business_critical": 60,
"false_positive": 365, "compensating_control": 180}
# Insert into database and notify approvers
return jsonify({"status": "pending", "id": "exc-12345"})
@app.route("/api/exceptions/<exc_id>/approve", methods=["POST"])
def approve_exception(exc_id):
approver = request.json.get("approver_email")
notes = request.json.get("notes", "")
# Update status to approved, record approver and timestamp
return jsonify({"status": "approved"})
@app.route("/api/exceptions/<exc_id>/reject", methods=["POST"])
def reject_exception(exc_id):
reviewer = request.json.get("reviewer_email")
reason = request.json.get("reason")
# Update status to rejected, record reviewer and reason
return jsonify({"status": "rejected"})
# Check for expired exceptions daily
python3 scripts/process.py --check-expirations
# Generate monthly exception report
python3 scripts/process.py --report --output exception_report.json
For each exception, compensating controls must address:
tools
Executes authorized phishing simulation campaigns to assess an organization's susceptibility to email-based social engineering attacks. The tester designs realistic phishing scenarios, builds credential harvesting infrastructure, sends targeted phishing emails, and tracks open rates, click-through rates, and credential submission rates to measure human security awareness. Activates for requests involving phishing simulation, social engineering assessment, email security testing, or security awareness measurement.
development
Drive a federal system through the NIST Risk Management Framework (SP 800-37 Rev 2) to an Authorization to Operate (ATO): Prepare, Categorize (FIPS 199), Select a control baseline (FIPS 200 / SP 800-53 Rev 5), Implement, Assess (SP 800-53A), Authorize, and Monitor continuously. Use when a system needs an ATO or a renewal, when working a FISMA/FedRAMP authorization package, when building or reviewing an SSP, SAR, or POA&M, when categorizing a system as Low/Moderate/High impact, when selecting or tailoring a control baseline, or when standing up continuous monitoring (ConMon) after authorization. Covers ATO, conditional ATO (cATO), and the artifacts assessors expect. Keywords: NIST RMF, 800-37, ATO, authorization to operate, FISMA, FedRAMP, SSP, SAR, POA&M, FIPS 199, FIPS 200, 800-53, 800-53A, control baseline, security categorization, continuous monitoring, authorizing official, system boundary, ongoing authorization.
development
Executes authorized attack simulations against Active Directory environments to identify misconfigurations, weak credentials, dangerous privilege paths, and exploitable trust relationships that could lead to domain compromise. The tester uses BloodHound for attack path analysis, Mimikatz for credential extraction, and Impacket for protocol-level attacks including Kerberoasting, AS-REP Roasting, and delegation abuse. Activates for requests involving Active Directory pentest, AD attack simulation, domain compromise testing, or Kerberos attack assessment.
tools
Evaluates and selects Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) products based on organizational requirements including feed integration capability, STIX/TAXII support, workflow automation, analyst interface, and total cost of ownership. Use when conducting a TIP procurement, migrating between TIP solutions, or assessing whether the current TIP meets program maturity requirements. Activates for requests involving ThreatConnect, MISP, OpenCTI, Anomali, EclecticIQ, or TIP procurement decisions.