skills/building-soc-escalation-matrix/SKILL.md
Build a structured SOC escalation matrix defining severity tiers, response SLAs, tiered escalation paths, and notification procedures for security incidents, using context-driven criteria that combine business risk, asset criticality, and data sensitivity. Use when designing or revising how a SOC triages and escalates incidents across analyst tiers.
npx skillsauth add mukul975/cyber-skills building-soc-escalation-matrixInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
A SOC escalation matrix defines how security incidents move through the organization based on severity, impact, and response requirements. Modern SOCs use context-driven escalation combining business risk, asset criticality, and data sensitivity rather than purely severity-based models. Organizations using AI and automation in their SOC cut detection-and-containment lifecycle to approximately 161 days, an 80-day improvement over the 241-day industry average.
| Attribute | Value | |---|---| | Impact | Active data breach, ransomware spreading, critical systems compromised | | Business Impact | Revenue loss, regulatory exposure, customer data at risk | | Initial Response | 15 minutes | | Escalation to Tier 2 | Immediate | | Escalation to Management | 30 minutes | | Resolution Target | 4 hours | | Communication | Every 30 minutes to stakeholders | | Examples | Active ransomware, confirmed data exfiltration, domain admin compromise |
| Attribute | Value | |---|---| | Impact | Confirmed compromise, limited scope, no active exfiltration | | Business Impact | Potential revenue impact, contained risk | | Initial Response | 30 minutes | | Escalation to Tier 2 | 30 minutes if unresolved | | Escalation to Management | 2 hours | | Resolution Target | 8 hours | | Communication | Every 2 hours to SOC management | | Examples | Compromised user account, malware on single endpoint, insider threat indicator |
| Attribute | Value | |---|---| | Impact | Suspicious activity requiring investigation | | Business Impact | Low immediate risk | | Initial Response | 4 hours | | Escalation to Tier 2 | 8 hours if unresolved | | Resolution Target | 24 hours | | Communication | Daily status update | | Examples | Policy violation, failed brute force, suspicious email report |
| Attribute | Value | |---|---| | Impact | Informational alerts, routine security events | | Business Impact | Minimal | | Initial Response | 8 hours | | Escalation | Only if pattern emerges | | Resolution Target | 72 hours | | Communication | Weekly summary | | Examples | Vulnerability scan findings, expired certificates, policy exceptions |
Asset Criticality
Low Medium High Critical
Severity Low P4 P4 P3 P3
Medium P4 P3 P2 P2
High P3 P2 P2 P1
Critical P2 P1 P1 P1
| Trigger | Action | |---|---| | Ransomware detected on any endpoint | P1 - Immediate Tier 3 + Management | | Domain admin account compromise | P1 - Immediate Tier 3 + Management | | Active data exfiltration to external IP | P1 - Immediate Tier 3 + Management | | Critical infrastructure (DC, SCADA) alert | P1 - Immediate Tier 2 minimum | | Executive account anomaly | P2 - Immediate Tier 2 | | Multiple hosts with same malware | P1 - Immediate Tier 2 |
| Condition | Action | |---|---| | P2 unresolved after 4 hours | Escalate to Tier 3 | | P3 unresolved after 12 hours | Escalate to Tier 2 | | Any incident unresolved past SLA | Escalate to SOC Manager | | P1 unresolved after 2 hours | Escalate to CISO |
SUBJECT: [P1 CRITICAL] Security Incident - {Incident_ID}
Incident Summary:
- Type: {incident_type}
- Affected Systems: {systems}
- Affected Users: {users}
- Current Status: {status}
- Assigned To: {analyst}
Impact Assessment:
- Business Impact: {impact}
- Data at Risk: {data_risk}
- Containment Status: {containment}
Next Actions:
- {action_1}
- {action_2}
Next Update: {time} (30-minute intervals)
Bridge Line: {conference_details}
# XSOAR escalation playbook trigger
trigger:
condition: incident.severity == "critical" AND incident.asset_criticality == "high"
action:
- assign_tier: 3
- notify: [soc_manager, ciso]
- create_war_room: true
- start_bridge: true
- set_sla: 4h
auto_escalation_rules:
- name: P2 Time-Based Escalation
condition: incident.severity == "high" AND incident.age > 4h AND incident.status != "resolved"
action:
- escalate_tier: 3
- notify: soc_manager
- add_comment: "Auto-escalated due to SLA breach"
development
Detect Pass-the-Hash (T1550.002) attacks by analyzing NTLM authentication patterns, flagging Type 3 logons using NTLM where Kerberos would be expected, and correlating with credential-dumping indicators. Use when threat hunting for lateral movement via stolen NTLM hashes, triaging EDR/SIEM alerts on suspicious NTLM logons, scoping compromise during incident response, or validating detection coverage in a purple team exercise.
testing
Detect and respond to OAuth token theft and replay in Microsoft Entra ID (Azure AD), covering access token theft, refresh token replay, Primary Refresh Token (PRT) abuse, pass-the-cookie attacks, and Token Protection conditional access policies. Use for impossible-travel or anomalous token-usage alerts, suspected session hijacking, sign-in log analysis, or configuring token-binding defenses in Azure/M365.
development
Detect NTLM relay attacks (T1557.001) by correlating Windows Event 4624 LogonType 3 for IP-to-hostname mismatches, identifying Responder/LLMNR poisoning artifacts, auditing SMB/LDAP signing, and flagging NTLMv2-to-NTLMv1 downgrades. Use for hunting credential relay in NTLM-enabled AD, investigating auth-source anomalies, building SIEM correlation rules, or responding to PetitPotam/DFSCoerce/PrinterBug alerts.
data-ai
Detect network reconnaissance and port scanning using Suricata and Snort IDS signatures, threshold-based detection rules, and traffic anomaly analysis to identify Nmap, Masscan, and custom scanning activity.