skills/building-soc-escalation-matrix/SKILL.md
Build a structured SOC escalation matrix defining severity tiers, response SLAs, tiered escalation paths, and notification procedures for security incidents, using context-driven criteria that combine business risk, asset criticality, and data sensitivity. Use when designing or revising how a SOC triages and escalates incidents across analyst tiers.
npx skillsauth add mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills building-soc-escalation-matrixInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
A SOC escalation matrix defines how security incidents move through the organization based on severity, impact, and response requirements. Modern SOCs use context-driven escalation combining business risk, asset criticality, and data sensitivity rather than purely severity-based models. Organizations using AI and automation in their SOC cut detection-and-containment lifecycle to approximately 161 days, an 80-day improvement over the 241-day industry average.
| Attribute | Value | |---|---| | Impact | Active data breach, ransomware spreading, critical systems compromised | | Business Impact | Revenue loss, regulatory exposure, customer data at risk | | Initial Response | 15 minutes | | Escalation to Tier 2 | Immediate | | Escalation to Management | 30 minutes | | Resolution Target | 4 hours | | Communication | Every 30 minutes to stakeholders | | Examples | Active ransomware, confirmed data exfiltration, domain admin compromise |
| Attribute | Value | |---|---| | Impact | Confirmed compromise, limited scope, no active exfiltration | | Business Impact | Potential revenue impact, contained risk | | Initial Response | 30 minutes | | Escalation to Tier 2 | 30 minutes if unresolved | | Escalation to Management | 2 hours | | Resolution Target | 8 hours | | Communication | Every 2 hours to SOC management | | Examples | Compromised user account, malware on single endpoint, insider threat indicator |
| Attribute | Value | |---|---| | Impact | Suspicious activity requiring investigation | | Business Impact | Low immediate risk | | Initial Response | 4 hours | | Escalation to Tier 2 | 8 hours if unresolved | | Resolution Target | 24 hours | | Communication | Daily status update | | Examples | Policy violation, failed brute force, suspicious email report |
| Attribute | Value | |---|---| | Impact | Informational alerts, routine security events | | Business Impact | Minimal | | Initial Response | 8 hours | | Escalation | Only if pattern emerges | | Resolution Target | 72 hours | | Communication | Weekly summary | | Examples | Vulnerability scan findings, expired certificates, policy exceptions |
Asset Criticality
Low Medium High Critical
Severity Low P4 P4 P3 P3
Medium P4 P3 P2 P2
High P3 P2 P2 P1
Critical P2 P1 P1 P1
| Trigger | Action | |---|---| | Ransomware detected on any endpoint | P1 - Immediate Tier 3 + Management | | Domain admin account compromise | P1 - Immediate Tier 3 + Management | | Active data exfiltration to external IP | P1 - Immediate Tier 3 + Management | | Critical infrastructure (DC, SCADA) alert | P1 - Immediate Tier 2 minimum | | Executive account anomaly | P2 - Immediate Tier 2 | | Multiple hosts with same malware | P1 - Immediate Tier 2 |
| Condition | Action | |---|---| | P2 unresolved after 4 hours | Escalate to Tier 3 | | P3 unresolved after 12 hours | Escalate to Tier 2 | | Any incident unresolved past SLA | Escalate to SOC Manager | | P1 unresolved after 2 hours | Escalate to CISO |
SUBJECT: [P1 CRITICAL] Security Incident - {Incident_ID}
Incident Summary:
- Type: {incident_type}
- Affected Systems: {systems}
- Affected Users: {users}
- Current Status: {status}
- Assigned To: {analyst}
Impact Assessment:
- Business Impact: {impact}
- Data at Risk: {data_risk}
- Containment Status: {containment}
Next Actions:
- {action_1}
- {action_2}
Next Update: {time} (30-minute intervals)
Bridge Line: {conference_details}
# XSOAR escalation playbook trigger
trigger:
condition: incident.severity == "critical" AND incident.asset_criticality == "high"
action:
- assign_tier: 3
- notify: [soc_manager, ciso]
- create_war_room: true
- start_bridge: true
- set_sla: 4h
auto_escalation_rules:
- name: P2 Time-Based Escalation
condition: incident.severity == "high" AND incident.age > 4h AND incident.status != "resolved"
action:
- escalate_tier: 3
- notify: soc_manager
- add_comment: "Auto-escalated due to SLA breach"
tools
Executes authorized phishing simulation campaigns to assess an organization's susceptibility to email-based social engineering attacks. The tester designs realistic phishing scenarios, builds credential harvesting infrastructure, sends targeted phishing emails, and tracks open rates, click-through rates, and credential submission rates to measure human security awareness. Activates for requests involving phishing simulation, social engineering assessment, email security testing, or security awareness measurement.
development
Drive a federal system through the NIST Risk Management Framework (SP 800-37 Rev 2) to an Authorization to Operate (ATO): Prepare, Categorize (FIPS 199), Select a control baseline (FIPS 200 / SP 800-53 Rev 5), Implement, Assess (SP 800-53A), Authorize, and Monitor continuously. Use when a system needs an ATO or a renewal, when working a FISMA/FedRAMP authorization package, when building or reviewing an SSP, SAR, or POA&M, when categorizing a system as Low/Moderate/High impact, when selecting or tailoring a control baseline, or when standing up continuous monitoring (ConMon) after authorization. Covers ATO, conditional ATO (cATO), and the artifacts assessors expect. Keywords: NIST RMF, 800-37, ATO, authorization to operate, FISMA, FedRAMP, SSP, SAR, POA&M, FIPS 199, FIPS 200, 800-53, 800-53A, control baseline, security categorization, continuous monitoring, authorizing official, system boundary, ongoing authorization.
development
Executes authorized attack simulations against Active Directory environments to identify misconfigurations, weak credentials, dangerous privilege paths, and exploitable trust relationships that could lead to domain compromise. The tester uses BloodHound for attack path analysis, Mimikatz for credential extraction, and Impacket for protocol-level attacks including Kerberoasting, AS-REP Roasting, and delegation abuse. Activates for requests involving Active Directory pentest, AD attack simulation, domain compromise testing, or Kerberos attack assessment.
tools
Evaluates and selects Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) products based on organizational requirements including feed integration capability, STIX/TAXII support, workflow automation, analyst interface, and total cost of ownership. Use when conducting a TIP procurement, migrating between TIP solutions, or assessing whether the current TIP meets program maturity requirements. Activates for requests involving ThreatConnect, MISP, OpenCTI, Anomali, EclecticIQ, or TIP procurement decisions.