skills/sprint-planning/SKILL.md
Structure and facilitate sprint planning sessions. Use when asked to plan a sprint, organise backlog items, assign story points, create sprint goals, or prepare sprint planning agendas. Produces a sprint goal, velocity-calibrated backlog, capacity plan, risk flags, and a structured sprint planning meeting agenda.
npx skillsauth add mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills sprint-planningInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Transform raw backlog items into a structured, achievable sprint with clear goals, velocity-calibrated scope, and team-ready output.
If a professional-brain (brain/) exists, ground in it instead of re-asking for what you already know:
decisions/ (what the team agreed matters), feature entities/, and open hypotheses/ the sprint might test. Run python3 ../professional-brain/scripts/brain_query.py ./brain "<sprint goal>" and carry each fact's provenance tag through.decisions/ record, provenance-tagged. Show it, get a yes, then write with ../professional-brain/scripts/brain_write.py … --commit (append-only, dry-run by default).Once the sprint is agreed, hand it to action-runner: it previews (dry-run, risk-rated), runs only what you approve via the connected action MCP, and records what was done back to the brain. Typical: create a ticket per committed backlog item and set the sprint milestone (🟡). This skill proposes; action-runner gates and runs — never silently.
Ask for (if not already provided):
Use this structure:
"This sprint we will [deliver X outcome] so that [user/business benefit], measured by [success indicator]."
Never write sprint goals as task lists. Always outcome-first.
| Complexity | Points | Description | |---|---|---| | Trivial | 1 | Clearly understood, no unknowns | | Small | 2 | Straightforward, minor effort | | Medium | 3 | Some complexity, clear path | | Large | 5 | Complex, needs design or research | | Very Large | 8 | High uncertainty, may need splitting | | Epic | 13+ | Too large — must be split before sprint |
Flag any item estimated at 8+ and recommend splitting.
Available capacity = (Team size × Sprint days × Focus hours/day) × Availability factor
Focus hours/day: 6 (accounting for meetings, Slack, admin)
Availability factor: 0.7–0.85 depending on holidays/events
Story points to commit = Historical velocity × Availability factor
This skill ships with a stdlib-only Python script that computes capacity instead of estimating it by hand. Use it whenever the team's numbers are known — it applies the availability and 80% commit-ratio rules consistently.
# Quick estimate from flags
python3 scripts/capacity_calculator.py --team 5 --days 10 --velocity 30 --availability 0.8 --carryover 5
# Detailed estimate from per-member availability (JSON via stdin or --input file.json)
echo '{"sprint_days":10,"historical_velocity":40,"carryover_points":8,
"members":[{"name":"Ada","available_days":10},{"name":"Linus","available_days":7}]}' \
| python3 scripts/capacity_calculator.py --input -
The script returns available focus hours, a velocity figure adjusted for real availability, the recommended commitment (capped at 80% of velocity), and the remaining capacity for new work after carry-overs. Run it first, then build the sprint backlog to fit the recommended number. Add --json to pipe the result into other tooling.
Sprint Goal:
[Goal statement]
Team Capacity: [X] story points available (based on [Y] team members, [Z]% availability)
Sprint Backlog:
| Priority | Story | Points | Owner | Acceptance Criteria | |---|---|---|---|---| | 1 | [Story title] | [N] | [Team member] | [When X then Y] |
Carry-Overs from Previous Sprint:
Risks & Dependencies:
Sprint Planning Agenda:
For tool-using or computer-use agents that can reach the team's tracker (Jira, Linear, GitHub Projects). Runtimes without tool access ignore this section and deliver the document. See SKILLSPEC.md §5 for the rules this block follows.
business
Analyze why deals are won and lost and turn it into an action plan. Use when asked to run a win/loss analysis, review closed-won and closed-lost deals, understand why the team is losing to a competitor, or summarize sales feedback into patterns. Produces a structured win/loss report with themes, win/loss rates by segment and competitor, representative quotes, and prioritized actions for product, marketing, and sales.
development
Route a fuzzy request to the right skill in this library. Use when the user is unsure which skill fits, asks 'which skill should I use for X', describes a task without naming a skill, or when a request could plausibly match several skills. Produces a best-fit recommendation with the inputs to gather, a runner-up with the tie-breaker, and a workflow recipe when the job spans multiple skills.
testing
Triage a vulnerability or scanner finding — assess real severity, exploitability, and how urgently to fix. Use when asked to triage a CVE, prioritize scanner/pentest findings, assess a vuln's risk, or decide what to patch first. Produces a triage verdict: CVSS-informed severity adjusted for your context, exploitability, real risk, a fix/mitigation, and an SLA — so you fix what matters, not just what's red.
development
Stand up a Voice of Customer (VoC) program that turns feedback into action. Use when asked to build a VoC program, design a customer feedback loop, consolidate feedback sources, or set up a closed-loop feedback process. Produces a VoC program design — objectives, feedback sources and channels, a taxonomy, collection and analysis cadence, closed-loop routing, ownership, and success metrics.