plugins/pm-craft/skills/session-handoff/SKILL.md
Write a handoff summary so another agent or person (or a fresh session) can pick up the work with full context. Use when ending a work session, hitting a context limit, switching agents, or pausing a task mid-flight. Produces a structured handoff: what the goal is, what's done, the current state, what's next, and the gotchas — so no context is lost across the boundary.
npx skillsauth add mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills session-handoffInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Work gets dropped at boundaries — a context window fills, a session ends, a task passes to someone else — and the next person (or agent) re-derives everything from scratch. This skill writes a tight handoff that carries the state across that boundary: the goal, what's done, where things stand, the exact next step, and the landmines. Optimised to be the first thing a fresh session reads.
Ask for these only if they aren't already provided (or infer from the session so far):
🎯 Objective — the goal in 1–2 lines, and the definition of done.
✅ Done so far — key work completed and decisions made (with the why for non-obvious calls), as tight bullets.
📍 Current state — exactly where things stand: branch/PR, what runs, what's failing, files touched, any half-finished change.
⏭️ Next step — the very next action, concrete enough to start immediately. Then the following 2–3 steps.
⚠️ Gotchas & dead ends — what was tried and didn't work (so it isn't repeated), constraints, sharp edges, anything surprising.
🔗 Pointers — key files (path:line), commands to run, links (PR, issue, docs) the next person needs.
Keep it skimmable — the next reader should grasp the state in under a minute.
Engineering handoff / pairing-rotation practice and incident-handoff (SBAR-style) structure adapted for agent and human work.
business
Analyze why deals are won and lost and turn it into an action plan. Use when asked to run a win/loss analysis, review closed-won and closed-lost deals, understand why the team is losing to a competitor, or summarize sales feedback into patterns. Produces a structured win/loss report with themes, win/loss rates by segment and competitor, representative quotes, and prioritized actions for product, marketing, and sales.
development
Route a fuzzy request to the right skill in this library. Use when the user is unsure which skill fits, asks 'which skill should I use for X', describes a task without naming a skill, or when a request could plausibly match several skills. Produces a best-fit recommendation with the inputs to gather, a runner-up with the tie-breaker, and a workflow recipe when the job spans multiple skills.
testing
Triage a vulnerability or scanner finding — assess real severity, exploitability, and how urgently to fix. Use when asked to triage a CVE, prioritize scanner/pentest findings, assess a vuln's risk, or decide what to patch first. Produces a triage verdict: CVSS-informed severity adjusted for your context, exploitability, real risk, a fix/mitigation, and an SLA — so you fix what matters, not just what's red.
development
Stand up a Voice of Customer (VoC) program that turns feedback into action. Use when asked to build a VoC program, design a customer feedback loop, consolidate feedback sources, or set up a closed-loop feedback process. Produces a VoC program design — objectives, feedback sources and channels, a taxonomy, collection and analysis cadence, closed-loop routing, ownership, and success metrics.