skills/readme-writer/SKILL.md
Write a clear, well-structured README for a software project or open-source repo. Use when asked to write or improve a README, document a project, or make a repo approachable. Produces a complete README — one-line pitch, badges, quickstart, usage, install, contributing, license — that gets someone from landing to running fast.
npx skillsauth add mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills readme-writerInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
The README is a project's front door — most people decide in seconds whether to use or bounce. This skill writes a clear, scannable README that answers what is this, why should I care, how do I run it immediately, then layers in the detail. Structured so a newcomer gets to a working result fast.
Ask for these only if they aren't already provided:
A complete README.md:
One-line pitch — what it does and for whom.
(Badges line — build, version, license — as placeholders to fill.)
Why [project]? — 2–3 sentences or bullets: the problem and what makes this worth using (honest, specific).
Features — the handful that matter, as a tight bullet list.
Quickstart
# install
# minimal working example
…with the expected result shown.
Usage — the common cases, with short code examples. Link out to full docs rather than inlining everything.
Installation — fuller install/requirements if the quickstart was minimal.
Contributing — how to contribute / link to CONTRIBUTING; be welcoming.
License — the license line.
(Adapt sections to the project; omit what doesn't apply. Keep it scannable with clear headings.)
Open-source README best practices (one-line pitch, time-to-first-success quickstart, scannable structure, standard sections).
business
Analyze why deals are won and lost and turn it into an action plan. Use when asked to run a win/loss analysis, review closed-won and closed-lost deals, understand why the team is losing to a competitor, or summarize sales feedback into patterns. Produces a structured win/loss report with themes, win/loss rates by segment and competitor, representative quotes, and prioritized actions for product, marketing, and sales.
development
Route a fuzzy request to the right skill in this library. Use when the user is unsure which skill fits, asks 'which skill should I use for X', describes a task without naming a skill, or when a request could plausibly match several skills. Produces a best-fit recommendation with the inputs to gather, a runner-up with the tie-breaker, and a workflow recipe when the job spans multiple skills.
testing
Triage a vulnerability or scanner finding — assess real severity, exploitability, and how urgently to fix. Use when asked to triage a CVE, prioritize scanner/pentest findings, assess a vuln's risk, or decide what to patch first. Produces a triage verdict: CVSS-informed severity adjusted for your context, exploitability, real risk, a fix/mitigation, and an SLA — so you fix what matters, not just what's red.
development
Stand up a Voice of Customer (VoC) program that turns feedback into action. Use when asked to build a VoC program, design a customer feedback loop, consolidate feedback sources, or set up a closed-loop feedback process. Produces a VoC program design — objectives, feedback sources and channels, a taxonomy, collection and analysis cadence, closed-loop routing, ownership, and success metrics.