plugins/pm-recruiting/skills/interview-question-bank/SKILL.md
Build a structured, role-specific interview question bank with what good answers look like. Use when asked to create interview questions, an interview guide, a structured interview kit, or competency-based questions for a role. Produces questions mapped to the competencies that matter — behavioral (STAR), role/technical, and values — each with what a strong vs. weak answer shows and follow-up probes, for fair, consistent interviews.
npx skillsauth add mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills interview-question-bankInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Unstructured interviews mostly measure who's charming. Structured, competency-based interviews predict performance — the same questions, mapped to what the role needs, scored against what a good answer looks like. This skill builds that question bank so every interviewer assesses the same things, fairly and consistently.
Given "interview questions for a senior PM", build the bank anyway — infer the core competencies for the role and write questions for each, labelling assumptions. Provide "what good looks like" for every question. Never hand back a flat list of questions with no evaluation guidance.
Ask for these only if they aren't already provided (else infer and label):
1. Competency map — the 4–6 competencies to assess and which round/interviewer owns each (avoid everyone asking the same thing).
2. Questions by competency — for each competency, 2–4 questions:
| Question | Type | What a strong answer shows | Red flags | Follow-up probes | |---|---|---|---|---| | "Tell me about a time you…" | Behavioral (STAR) | specifics, their role, the outcome, learning | vague, all "we", no result | "What would you do differently?" |
Include behavioral (past behaviour, STAR-friendly), role/technical (a realistic problem or scenario), and values questions.
3. Scoring — a simple rubric (e.g. 1–4 per competency) and the bar to advance, so scores are comparable across interviewers.
4. Fairness notes — ask every candidate the same core questions; keep questions job-related; avoid questions about protected characteristics (age, family, health, religion, etc.); focus on evidence, not "fit feeling".
Structured-interview practice — competency-based, behaviorally-anchored questions with scoring rubrics and fairness/consistency safeguards.
business
Analyze why deals are won and lost and turn it into an action plan. Use when asked to run a win/loss analysis, review closed-won and closed-lost deals, understand why the team is losing to a competitor, or summarize sales feedback into patterns. Produces a structured win/loss report with themes, win/loss rates by segment and competitor, representative quotes, and prioritized actions for product, marketing, and sales.
development
Route a fuzzy request to the right skill in this library. Use when the user is unsure which skill fits, asks 'which skill should I use for X', describes a task without naming a skill, or when a request could plausibly match several skills. Produces a best-fit recommendation with the inputs to gather, a runner-up with the tie-breaker, and a workflow recipe when the job spans multiple skills.
testing
Triage a vulnerability or scanner finding — assess real severity, exploitability, and how urgently to fix. Use when asked to triage a CVE, prioritize scanner/pentest findings, assess a vuln's risk, or decide what to patch first. Produces a triage verdict: CVSS-informed severity adjusted for your context, exploitability, real risk, a fix/mitigation, and an SLA — so you fix what matters, not just what's red.
development
Stand up a Voice of Customer (VoC) program that turns feedback into action. Use when asked to build a VoC program, design a customer feedback loop, consolidate feedback sources, or set up a closed-loop feedback process. Produces a VoC program design — objectives, feedback sources and channels, a taxonomy, collection and analysis cadence, closed-loop routing, ownership, and success metrics.