plugins/pm-dataeng/skills/data-quality-checks/SKILL.md
Design the data quality checks for a table or pipeline across the standard dimensions. Use when asked to add data quality tests, define DQ checks, catch bad data before it hits dashboards, or set up monitoring for a dataset. Produces a checks plan across completeness, validity, uniqueness, freshness, consistency, and accuracy — each with the rule, severity, and where it runs (dbt test / Great Expectations / SQL assertion).
npx skillsauth add mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills data-quality-checksInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Bad data quietly poisons dashboards and models until someone notices the number is wrong. The fix is checks that fail loudly before that — across the standard DQ dimensions. This skill designs them for a specific table/pipeline: the exact rule per dimension, its severity (block vs. warn), and where it runs (dbt test, Great Expectations, or a SQL assertion), so quality is enforced, not hoped for.
Ask for these only if they aren't already provided:
[table]Checks organised by dimension — each with the rule, severity (🔴 block the pipeline / 🟡 warn), and where it runs:
| Dimension | Check | Rule | Severity | Implement as |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Completeness | required fields non-null | not_null on [cols] | 🔴 | dbt test |
| Uniqueness | grain key unique | unique on [key] | 🔴 | dbt test |
| Validity | values in allowed set/range | accepted_values / range | 🟡 | GE / SQL |
| Freshness | data is current | max(loaded_at) within SLA | 🔴 | dbt source freshness |
| Consistency | cross-field / cross-table | e.g. totals reconcile, FK exists | 🟡 | SQL assertion |
| Accuracy | matches a source of truth | reconcile vs. system-of-record | 🟡 | SQL assertion |
Notes:
Data-quality practice — the six DQ dimensions, dbt tests / Great Expectations / source-freshness, severity-tiered enforcement.
business
Analyze why deals are won and lost and turn it into an action plan. Use when asked to run a win/loss analysis, review closed-won and closed-lost deals, understand why the team is losing to a competitor, or summarize sales feedback into patterns. Produces a structured win/loss report with themes, win/loss rates by segment and competitor, representative quotes, and prioritized actions for product, marketing, and sales.
development
Route a fuzzy request to the right skill in this library. Use when the user is unsure which skill fits, asks 'which skill should I use for X', describes a task without naming a skill, or when a request could plausibly match several skills. Produces a best-fit recommendation with the inputs to gather, a runner-up with the tie-breaker, and a workflow recipe when the job spans multiple skills.
testing
Triage a vulnerability or scanner finding — assess real severity, exploitability, and how urgently to fix. Use when asked to triage a CVE, prioritize scanner/pentest findings, assess a vuln's risk, or decide what to patch first. Produces a triage verdict: CVSS-informed severity adjusted for your context, exploitability, real risk, a fix/mitigation, and an SLA — so you fix what matters, not just what's red.
development
Stand up a Voice of Customer (VoC) program that turns feedback into action. Use when asked to build a VoC program, design a customer feedback loop, consolidate feedback sources, or set up a closed-loop feedback process. Produces a VoC program design — objectives, feedback sources and channels, a taxonomy, collection and analysis cadence, closed-loop routing, ownership, and success metrics.