plugins/pm-data/skills/cohort-analysis/SKILL.md
Structure a cohort analysis for retention, LTV, or behavioural patterns. Use when asked to run a cohort analysis, analyse retention by cohort, segment users by behaviour over time, or calculate lifetime value by acquisition period. Produces a complete cohort analysis framework with methodology, cohort definitions, retention curves, and prioritised interventions.
npx skillsauth add mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills cohort-analysisInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
This skill produces a structured cohort analysis covering retention curves, LTV estimation, behavioural segmentation, and actionable interventions. Output is ready to present to product leadership or share with growth and data teams.
Ask the user for these if not provided:
Analysis type: [Retention / LTV / Behavioural / Churn] Cohort definition: [Acquisition month / Signup channel / Plan tier / Feature adoption date] Observation window: [X months / weeks] Primary metric: [Metric name] Date prepared: [Date]
| Cohort | Period | Size | Description | |---|---|---|---| | [Cohort 1] | [Jan 2025] | [N users] | [e.g. Users who signed up in Jan 2025 via organic] | | [Cohort 2] | [Feb 2025] | [N users] | [...] |
Cohort logic:
How to read: Each cell shows what % of the cohort performed the key metric in period N.
| Cohort | Period 0 | Period 1 | Period 2 | Period 3 | Period 6 | Period 12 | |---|---|---|---|---|---|---| | Jan 2025 | 100% | [X%] | [X%] | [X%] | [X%] | [X%] | | Feb 2025 | 100% | [X%] | [X%] | [X%] | [X%] | [X%] | | [Trend] | — | [↑/↓ vs prior] | [...] | [...] | [...] | [...] |
Retention plateau: [At what period does retention flatten? What % does it flatten at?]
Key observations:
ARPU per period: [£/$/€ X per active user per month] Retention curve used: [Which cohort or blended average]
| Period | Retained % | Revenue per user | Cumulative LTV | |---|---|---|---| | Month 1 | [X%] | [£X] | [£X] | | Month 3 | [X%] | [£X] | [£X] | | Month 6 | [X%] | [£X] | [£X] | | Month 12 | [X%] | [£X] | [£X] |
Blended LTV: [£X at 12 months — based on blended retention across cohorts]
LTV by segment: | Segment | LTV (12M) | vs Baseline | |---|---|---| | [Organic] | [£X] | [+X%] | | [Paid] | [£X] | [-X%] | | [Enterprise] | [£X] | [+X%] |
Group cohorts by behaviour patterns, not just acquisition date:
| Segment | Definition | Size | Retention (P6) | LTV (12M) | |---|---|---|---|---| | Power users | [Used core feature ≥ 3x/week in first 30 days] | [X%] | [X%] | [£X] | | Casual users | [Used 1–2x/week in first 30 days] | [X%] | [X%] | [£X] | | Dormant | [Logged in but did not use core feature] | [X%] | [X%] | [£X] | | Never activated | [Signed up but never completed onboarding] | [X%] | [X%] | [£X] |
Activation threshold insight: [What action — taken within the first X days — most strongly predicts retention? This is the "aha moment" to optimise for.]
List the signals that appear before users churn, so teams can intervene:
| Signal | How early does it appear? | Churn correlation | Intervention | |---|---|---|---| | [No login for 7 days] | [7 days before churn] | [Strong] | [Re-engagement email sequence] | | [Support ticket with escalation] | [14 days before churn] | [Moderate] | [CSM outreach within 48 hours] | | [Feature usage dropped >50% WoW] | [10 days before churn] | [Strong] | [In-app nudge with use-case tutorial] |
Compare oldest and newest cohorts to assess whether product improvements are showing up in retention:
| Metric | [Oldest cohort — e.g. Jan 2024] | [Newest cohort — e.g. Jan 2025] | Change | |---|---|---|---| | Period 1 retention | [X%] | [X%] | [↑/↓ X pp] | | Period 3 retention | [X%] | [X%] | [↑/↓ X pp] | | Activation rate | [X%] | [X%] | [↑/↓ X pp] | | Avg. sessions in first 30 days | [X] | [X] | [↑/↓] |
Verdict: [Are more recent cohorts performing better or worse? What shipped in that period that might explain the change?]
Prioritise by impact on retention curve:
| # | Recommendation | Target segment | Expected impact | Effort | Priority | |---|---|---|---|---|---| | 1 | [e.g. Redesign onboarding to hit activation milestone in day 1, not day 7] | [Never-activated segment] | [+X pp P1 retention] | [Medium] | P1 | | 2 | [e.g. Launch re-engagement sequence at day 7 inactivity trigger] | [Dormant segment] | [+X pp P2 retention] | [Low] | P1 | | 3 | [e.g. Introduce power-user features earlier to accelerate habit formation] | [Casual users] | [+X pp P6 LTV] | [High] | P2 |
Provide the core cohort query so data teams can replicate or extend the analysis:
-- Retention cohort query
SELECT
DATE_TRUNC('month', u.created_at) AS cohort_month,
DATE_TRUNC('month', e.event_date) AS activity_month,
DATEDIFF('month', u.created_at, e.event_date) AS period,
COUNT(DISTINCT e.user_id) AS retained_users,
COUNT(DISTINCT c.user_id) AS cohort_size,
ROUND(COUNT(DISTINCT e.user_id) * 100.0 / COUNT(DISTINCT c.user_id), 1) AS retention_rate
FROM users u
JOIN events e ON u.user_id = e.user_id
JOIN (
SELECT user_id, DATE_TRUNC('month', created_at) AS cohort_month
FROM users
WHERE created_at >= '[start_date]'
) c ON u.user_id = c.user_id AND DATE_TRUNC('month', u.created_at) = c.cohort_month
WHERE e.event_type = '[key_retention_event]'
GROUP BY 1, 2, 3
ORDER BY 1, 3;
development
Analyse competitor moves and translate them into strategic implications for your product roadmap. Use when a competitor announces a new feature, pricing change, partnership, or strategic shift, or when producing a periodic competitive intelligence report. Produces a categorised signal analysis with reactive-vs-proactive assessment, threat ratings, specific roadmap implications, and recommended responses with owners.
development
Build a community management playbook for a brand's social media channels. Use when asked to create guidelines for managing comments, DMs, and community interactions, define a moderation policy, or build response frameworks for social media community managers. Produces a complete playbook with response templates, escalation paths, moderation rules, and tone guidelines.
development
Activate a 4-stage coding discipline framework that forces Claude to plan before coding, isolate changes on a branch, write tests first, and self-review output twice before presenting it. Use when starting a complex coding task, when past Claude sessions produced broken first drafts, or when you want to prevent rework cycles. Produces a confirmed written plan, isolated feature branch, test-first implementation, and a double-reviewed output with a correctness and code-quality checklist.
development
Optimize an article for Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) — restructuring content so AI engines like ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Claude can extract, quote, and cite it. Rewrites headings as questions, drops 50-80 word answer capsules, audits paragraph length, and flags trust signals. Use when asked to AEO-optimize, make content AI-readable, improve AI citation chances, or adapt an article for answer engines.