kienbui1995/requesting-code-review
skills/requesting-code-review/SKILL.md
Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements
development
Updated Apr 24, 2026
$ install --global
skillsauthnpx skillsauth add kienbui1995/magic-powers requesting-code-reviewInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
Security Scan Results
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
3
Scanners Passed
9
Scanners in report
Clean
TrivyContainer and dependency vulnerability scanner
95%
Clean
SemgrepStatic code analysis for vulnerabilities
95%
Clean
mcp-scan (Snyk)Model Context Protocol security validation
95%
Skipped
Snyk (dep)Open source security scanning
50%
Skipped
Socket.devSupply chain security analysis
50%
Skipped
VirusTotalMulti-engine malware detection
50%
Skipped
CrowdStrikeAdvanced threat intelligence
50%
Skipped
OSV-ScannerOpen Source Vulnerability database check
50%
Skipped
OWASP Dep-Check
50%
Last scanned: Apr 24, 2026, 4:10 AM172.2s1 file scanned
SKILL.md
- name:
- requesting-code-review
- description:
- Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements
Requesting Code Review
Dispatch the reviewer agent (Haiku — fast and cheap) to catch issues before they cascade. The reviewer gets precisely crafted context — never your session history.
Core principle: Review early, review often.
When to Request Review
Mandatory:
- After each task in subagent-driven development
- After completing major feature
- Before merge to main
Optional but valuable:
- When stuck (fresh perspective)
- Before refactoring (baseline check)
- After fixing complex bug
How to Request
1. Get git SHAs:
BASE_SHA=$(git rev-parse HEAD~1) # or origin/main
HEAD_SHA=$(git rev-parse HEAD)
2. Dispatch reviewer agent with context:
- What was implemented
- Plan or requirements reference
- Base and head SHAs
- Brief description
3. Act on feedback:
- 🔴 Critical → fix immediately
- 🟡 Important → fix before proceeding
- 🟢 Minor → note for later
- Push back if reviewer is wrong (with reasoning)
Cost Advantage
Using the reviewer agent (Haiku) for code review is ~60x cheaper than using Opus. Reviews are fast, focused tasks — perfect for a smaller model. The reviewer has read-only tools (Read, Grep, Glob, Bash) which is all it needs.
Integration
- magic-powers:subagent-driven-development — auto-dispatches review after each task
- magic-powers:receiving-code-review — how to handle review feedback
- magic-powers:verification-before-completion — verify fixes after review
Related Skills
kienbui1995/xr-interface-design
content-media
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Use when designing for XR (AR/VR/MR), choosing interaction modes, or adapting 2D UI patterns for spatial computing
SKILL.mdUpdated Apr 24, 2026
kienbui1995/writing-skills
testing
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Use when creating new skills, editing existing skills, or verifying skills work before deployment
SKILL.mdUpdated Apr 24, 2026
kienbui1995/writing-plans
development
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Use when you have a spec or requirements for a multi-step task, before touching code
SKILL.mdUpdated Apr 24, 2026
kienbui1995/workflow-templates
development
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Use when executing a structured workflow — select and run a feature, bugfix, refactor, research, or incident template with correct agent and model assignments per phase.
SKILL.mdUpdated Apr 24, 2026