skills/ai-marketing-suite/skills/market-report/SKILL.md
# Marketing Report Generator (Markdown Format) ## Skill Purpose Generate a comprehensive, professionally formatted marketing report in Markdown. This skill compiles data from all previous audit and analysis results into a single, client-ready document with scores, findings, recommendations, and a prioritized action plan with revenue impact estimates. ## When to Use - User wants a full marketing report for a client or their own business - User has completed one or more audit skills and wants a
npx skillsauth add kennyolofsson23-netizen/claude-code-config skills/ai-marketing-suite/skills/market-reportInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Generate a comprehensive, professionally formatted marketing report in Markdown. This skill compiles data from all previous audit and analysis results into a single, client-ready document with scores, findings, recommendations, and a prioritized action plan with revenue impact estimates.
/market report or /market report <domain>Before generating the report, check for any existing audit data from previous skill runs. Look for these files in the project directory:
Possible data sources:
MARKETING-AUDIT.md -- from /market auditLANDING-CRO.md -- from /market landingSEO-AUDIT.md -- from /market seoBRAND-VOICE.md -- from /market brandCOMPETITOR-ANALYSIS.md -- from /market competitorsFUNNEL-ANALYSIS.md -- from /market funnelCONTENT-AUDIT.md -- from content analysisAD-AUDIT.md -- from /market adsSOCIAL-AUDIT.md -- from /market socialEMAIL-AUDIT.md -- from /market emailsIf no previous data exists, inform the user and offer to:
Score across 6 categories, each worth up to 100 points. The overall score is the weighted average.
Evaluate based on landing page analysis, CRO findings, and UX assessment.
| Factor | Points Available | Criteria | |---|---|---| | Page load speed | 15 | Under 2s = 15, Under 3s = 10, Under 5s = 5, Over 5s = 0 | | Mobile responsiveness | 15 | Fully responsive = 15, Mostly = 10, Partially = 5, Not = 0 | | Clear value proposition | 20 | Immediately clear = 20, Takes effort = 12, Vague = 5, Missing = 0 | | CTA effectiveness | 20 | Strong and clear = 20, Present but weak = 12, Unclear = 5, Missing = 0 | | Social proof | 15 | Multiple types = 15, Some = 10, Minimal = 5, None = 0 | | Form optimization | 15 | Optimized = 15, Adequate = 10, Needs work = 5, Broken = 0 |
Evaluate based on SEO audit findings.
| Factor | Points Available | Criteria | |---|---|---| | Title tags & meta descriptions | 15 | Optimized = 15, Present = 10, Partial = 5, Missing = 0 | | Header hierarchy (H1-H6) | 10 | Proper = 10, Mostly = 7, Needs work = 3, Missing = 0 | | Content quality (E-E-A-T) | 25 | Excellent = 25, Good = 17, Average = 10, Poor = 3 | | Technical SEO | 20 | No issues = 20, Minor issues = 13, Major issues = 7, Critical = 0 | | Internal linking | 15 | Strategic = 15, Present = 10, Minimal = 5, None = 0 | | Schema markup | 15 | Comprehensive = 15, Basic = 10, Minimal = 5, None = 0 |
Evaluate based on brand voice analysis and content audit.
| Factor | Points Available | Criteria | |---|---|---| | Brand voice consistency | 20 | Consistent = 20, Mostly = 13, Inconsistent = 7, No voice = 0 | | Content quality | 25 | Expert-level = 25, Good = 17, Generic = 10, Poor = 3 | | Content variety | 15 | Multiple formats = 15, Some = 10, Limited = 5, Single = 0 | | Publishing frequency | 15 | Regular cadence = 15, Sporadic = 10, Rare = 5, None = 0 | | Audience targeting | 25 | Precisely targeted = 25, Somewhat = 17, Broad = 10, Off-target = 3 |
Evaluate based on social media presence and engagement.
| Factor | Points Available | Criteria | |---|---|---| | Platform presence | 15 | Right platforms, active = 15, Present but inactive = 8, Missing key = 3 | | Content quality | 25 | Engaging and on-brand = 25, Adequate = 15, Low quality = 7, Poor = 0 | | Engagement rate | 25 | Above benchmark = 25, At benchmark = 17, Below = 10, Negligible = 3 | | Posting consistency | 15 | Regular schedule = 15, Sporadic = 10, Rare = 5, Abandoned = 0 | | Community building | 20 | Active community = 20, Some engagement = 13, Broadcast only = 7, None = 0 |
Evaluate based on email marketing assessment.
| Factor | Points Available | Criteria | |---|---|---| | List building mechanism | 20 | Multiple opt-ins = 20, One opt-in = 13, No visible opt-in = 5 | | Email design & content | 20 | Professional and engaging = 20, Adequate = 13, Needs work = 7 | | Automation sequences | 25 | Comprehensive = 25, Basic = 15, Minimal = 8, None = 0 | | Segmentation | 20 | Advanced = 20, Basic = 13, None = 5 | | Deliverability signals | 15 | Strong = 15, Adequate = 10, Concerning = 5, Problems = 0 |
Evaluate based on ad account audit (if applicable).
| Factor | Points Available | Criteria | |---|---|---| | Campaign structure | 20 | Well-organized = 20, Adequate = 13, Messy = 7, None = 0 | | Targeting quality | 25 | Precise and layered = 25, Good = 17, Broad = 10, Wasteful = 3 | | Ad creative quality | 25 | Compelling and varied = 25, Adequate = 17, Weak = 10, Poor = 3 | | Landing page alignment | 15 | Perfect match = 15, Good = 10, Misaligned = 5, Broken = 0 | | Tracking & attribution | 15 | Comprehensive = 15, Basic = 10, Minimal = 5, Missing = 0 |
Overall Score = (Website * 0.25) + (SEO * 0.20) + (Content * 0.15) + (Social * 0.15) + (Email * 0.15) + (Paid * 0.10)
Score Interpretation: | Score Range | Rating | Meaning | |---|---|---| | 85-100 | Excellent | Marketing is a competitive advantage. Optimize and scale. | | 70-84 | Good | Solid foundation with clear improvement opportunities. | | 55-69 | Average | Functional but leaving significant growth on the table. | | 40-54 | Below Average | Multiple areas need attention. Significant opportunity cost. | | 0-39 | Critical | Marketing is actively hurting growth. Immediate action required. |
For each of the 6 categories, provide:
Revenue Impact Estimation Framework:
Impact = (Estimated traffic change * Conversion rate change * Average deal value) * Confidence factor
Example:
- Current monthly traffic: 10,000
- Recommended SEO improvements could increase traffic 30%: +3,000 visits
- Current conversion rate: 2%, CRO could improve to 3%: +1% = +130 conversions
- Average deal value: $500
- Estimated monthly revenue impact: $65,000
- Confidence factor (conservative): 0.5
- Conservative estimate: $32,500/month additional revenue
If competitor data is available from /market competitors, include:
Competitive Positioning Matrix: | Factor | Client | Competitor 1 | Competitor 2 | Competitor 3 | |---|---|---|---|---| | Website Quality | X/10 | X/10 | X/10 | X/10 | | SEO Visibility | X/10 | X/10 | X/10 | X/10 | | Content Quality | X/10 | X/10 | X/10 | X/10 | | Social Presence | X/10 | X/10 | X/10 | X/10 | | Overall Position | Xth/4 | Xth/4 | Xth/4 | Xth/4 |
Competitive Advantages: What the client does better Competitive Gaps: Where competitors outperform the client Opportunities: Spaces competitors are not addressing
Summarize content findings across all channels:
Compile all conversion-related findings:
Summarize SEO health in a scannable format:
SEO Health Snapshot:
- Title Tags: [Optimized / Needs Work / Missing]
- Meta Descriptions: [Optimized / Needs Work / Missing]
- H1 Tags: [Proper / Issues / Missing]
- Image Alt Text: [Complete / Partial / Missing]
- Page Speed: [Fast / Moderate / Slow]
- Mobile-Friendly: [Yes / Partially / No]
- Schema Markup: [Present / Partial / Missing]
- Robots.txt: [Configured / Issues / Missing]
- Sitemap: [Present / Issues / Missing]
- HTTPS: [Yes / No]
- Core Web Vitals: [Pass / Needs Work / Fail]
Organize all recommendations into three tiers:
High impact, low effort changes. These should be implementable within 1-5 business days.
Format each item as:
- [ ] [Action item]: [Specific description]
- Impact: [HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW]
- Effort: [1-5 hours]
- Expected Result: [Specific outcome]
- Revenue Impact: [$X/month estimated]
Moderate impact, moderate effort. These require 1-4 weeks.
High impact, high effort. These are foundational changes that require planning and sustained effort.
Days 1-30: Foundation & Quick Wins
Days 31-60: Growth & Optimization
Days 61-90: Scale & Expand
Include methodology notes so the client understands how scores were derived:
Scoring Methodology:
Tools Used:
Glossary:
Generate a file called MARKETING-REPORT.md with:
# Marketing Report
## [Company/Domain Name]
### Prepared by: [Agent/Agency Name]
### Date: [Date]
---
## Executive Summary
### Overall Marketing Score: [X/100] -- [Rating]
[2-3 paragraph summary covering: current state assessment, top 3 findings, estimated revenue impact of implementing recommendations, and recommended first steps]
### Score Breakdown
| Category | Score | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| Website & Conversion | X/100 | [Rating] |
| SEO & Organic | X/100 | [Rating] |
| Content & Messaging | X/100 | [Rating] |
| Social Media | X/100 | [Rating] |
| Email & Automation | X/100 | [Rating] |
| Paid Advertising | X/100 | [Rating] |
| **Overall** | **X/100** | **[Rating]** |
### Top 3 Priority Actions
1. [Most impactful recommendation with revenue estimate]
2. [Second most impactful recommendation]
3. [Third most impactful recommendation]
---
## Detailed Findings
### 1. Website & Conversion [X/100]
[Deep-dive analysis with findings, what's working, gaps, recommendations]
### 2. SEO & Organic [X/100]
[Deep-dive analysis]
### 3. Content & Messaging [X/100]
[Deep-dive analysis]
### 4. Social Media [X/100]
[Deep-dive analysis]
### 5. Email & Automation [X/100]
[Deep-dive analysis]
### 6. Paid Advertising [X/100]
[Deep-dive analysis]
---
## Competitor Comparison
[Matrix and analysis]
---
## SEO Snapshot
[Health checklist]
---
## Conversion Optimization Summary
[Funnel analysis and CRO recommendations]
---
## Revenue Impact Summary
| Recommendation | Estimated Monthly Impact | Confidence | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|
| [Rec 1] | $X,XXX | High/Medium/Low | 1 |
| [Rec 2] | $X,XXX | High/Medium/Low | 2 |
| ... | ... | ... | ... |
| **Total Estimated Impact** | **$XX,XXX/month** | | |
---
## Prioritized Action Plan
### Quick Wins (This Week)
- [ ] [Action items with impact and effort]
### Medium-Term (This Month)
- [ ] [Action items]
### Strategic (This Quarter)
- [ ] [Action items]
---
## 30-60-90 Day Roadmap
[Week-by-week plan]
---
## Appendix
### Methodology
### Tools Used
### Glossary
### Data Sources
development
React and Next.js performance optimization guidelines from Vercel Engineering. This skill should be used when writing, reviewing, or refactoring React/Next.js code to ensure optimal performance patterns. Triggers on tasks involving React components, Next.js pages, data fetching, bundle optimization, or performance improvements.
testing
Full QA pass: run all tests, check types, catch regressions, write missing tests. Use when the user says "run tests", "QA", "verify changes", "check for regressions", "test everything", or "make sure it works".
development
Provides guidance for property-based testing across multiple languages and smart contracts. Use when writing tests, reviewing code with serialization/validation/parsing patterns, designing features, or when property-based testing would provide stronger coverage than example-based tests.
development
Initialize a new project with Kenny's universal conventions and stack-appropriate infrastructure. Use this skill whenever: setting up a new project, creating a new repo, scaffolding a new app, starting fresh on a new idea, 'init project', 'new project', 'set up a new app', 'create a project for X', or any variant of starting a new codebase from scratch. Also trigger when the user says 'bootstrap', 'scaffold', or 'kickstart'. This skill ensures every project gets the same quality gates and conventions while adapting infrastructure to the chosen stack.