skills/spm/cwm-tasks-generation/SKILL.md
Generate task breakdowns from requirements or user stories with structured task lists, dependencies, assignments, and effort estimates
npx skillsauth add happy-technologies-llc/happy-servicenow-skills cwm-tasks-generationInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
This skill covers generating structured task breakdowns from requirements, user stories, or high-level project descriptions in ServiceNow CWM:
When to use: When starting a new project phase, converting approved requirements into executable tasks, breaking down epics or user stories, or restructuring a project plan for replanning.
project_manager, program_manager, or admincom.snc.project_management (Project Portfolio Management) or CWM workspacepm_project_task, planned_task tablesspm/cwm-doc-generation for status reporting, spm/acceptance-criteria for defining done criteriaReview the input requirements or user stories to identify work components.
MCP Approach:
Tool: SN-Read-Record
Parameters:
table_name: pm_project
sys_id: [PROJECT_SYS_ID]
fields: sys_id,number,short_description,description,planned_start_date,planned_end_date,project_manager,methodology
If requirements are stored as stories or demand items:
Tool: SN-Query-Table
Parameters:
table_name: rm_story
query: product=[PROJECT_SYS_ID]^state!=cancelled
fields: sys_id,number,short_description,description,acceptance_criteria,story_points,priority
limit: 50
Decomposition Framework:
| Requirement Type | Decomposition Approach | |-----------------|----------------------| | Epic / Feature | Break into user stories, then tasks | | User Story | Break into implementation tasks (design, build, test, deploy) | | Technical Requirement | Break into analysis, implementation, validation tasks | | Business Process | Break into process steps, each becoming a task | | Integration | Break into design, develop, test, certify tasks |
Create the hierarchical task structure with parent-child relationships.
PROJECT: [Project Name]
|
+-- Phase 1: [Phase Name]
| +-- WP 1.1: [Work Package]
| | +-- Task 1.1.1: [Task]
| | +-- Task 1.1.2: [Task]
| +-- WP 1.2: [Work Package]
| | +-- Task 1.2.1: [Task]
| +-- Milestone: [Phase 1 Complete]
|
+-- Phase 2: [Phase Name]
| +-- WP 2.1: [Work Package]
| ...
Build the top-level phase containers.
MCP Approach:
Tool: SN-Create-Record
Parameters:
table_name: pm_project_task
data:
project: [PROJECT_SYS_ID]
short_description: "Phase 1: Requirements and Design"
description: "Gather detailed requirements, create solution design, and obtain stakeholder approval"
state: pending
priority: 2
planned_start_date: "2026-04-01"
planned_end_date: "2026-04-30"
top_task: true
wbs: "1"
REST Approach:
POST /api/now/table/pm_project_task
Body: {
"project": "[PROJECT_SYS_ID]",
"short_description": "Phase 1: Requirements and Design",
"description": "Gather detailed requirements, create solution design, and obtain stakeholder approval",
"state": "pending",
"priority": "2",
"planned_start_date": "2026-04-01",
"planned_end_date": "2026-04-30",
"top_task": "true",
"wbs": "1"
}
Build detailed tasks under each phase.
MCP Approach:
Tool: SN-Create-Record
Parameters:
table_name: pm_project_task
data:
project: [PROJECT_SYS_ID]
parent: [PHASE_TASK_SYS_ID]
short_description: "Conduct stakeholder interviews"
description: "Schedule and conduct interviews with 8 key stakeholders to gather requirements for the new system"
state: pending
priority: 2
planned_start_date: "2026-04-01"
planned_end_date: "2026-04-05"
estimated_work_duration: "3 days"
assigned_to: [USER_SYS_ID]
assignment_group: [GROUP_SYS_ID]
wbs: "1.1"
skill: "Business Analysis"
REST Approach:
POST /api/now/table/pm_project_task
Body: {
"project": "[PROJECT_SYS_ID]",
"parent": "[PHASE_TASK_SYS_ID]",
"short_description": "Conduct stakeholder interviews",
"state": "pending",
"planned_start_date": "2026-04-01",
"planned_end_date": "2026-04-05",
"estimated_work_duration": "3 days",
"assigned_to": "[USER_SYS_ID]",
"wbs": "1.1"
}
Standard Task Templates per Requirement Type:
| User Story Task | Est. Effort | Skills Needed | |----------------|-------------|---------------| | Requirements Analysis | 4-8 hrs | Business Analyst | | Solution Design | 8-16 hrs | Architect/Tech Lead | | Implementation/Build | 16-40 hrs | Developer | | Unit Testing | 4-8 hrs | Developer | | Integration Testing | 8-16 hrs | QA Engineer | | User Acceptance Testing | 4-8 hrs | BA + End Users | | Documentation | 4-8 hrs | Tech Writer/BA | | Deployment | 2-4 hrs | DevOps/Admin |
Create predecessor/successor relationships between tasks.
MCP Approach:
Tool: SN-Update-Record
Parameters:
table_name: pm_project_task
sys_id: [TASK_SYS_ID]
data:
predecessor: [PREDECESSOR_TASK_SYS_ID]
predecessor_type: "FS"
Dependency Types:
| Type | Code | Meaning | Example | |------|------|---------|---------| | Finish-to-Start | FS | B starts after A finishes | Build after Design | | Start-to-Start | SS | B starts when A starts | Testing starts with Build | | Finish-to-Finish | FF | B finishes when A finishes | Documentation finishes with Build | | Start-to-Finish | SF | B finishes when A starts | Rarely used |
Common Dependency Patterns:
Requirements Analysis (FS) -> Solution Design (FS) -> Implementation
Implementation (FS) -> Unit Testing (FS) -> Integration Testing
Integration Testing (FS) -> UAT (FS) -> Deployment
Documentation (SS) -> Implementation (parallel start)
Create milestone tasks at key project checkpoints.
MCP Approach:
Tool: SN-Create-Record
Parameters:
table_name: pm_project_task
data:
project: [PROJECT_SYS_ID]
parent: [PHASE_TASK_SYS_ID]
short_description: "MILESTONE: Design Review Approved"
state: pending
milestone: true
planned_end_date: "2026-04-15"
duration: "0"
predecessor: [DESIGN_TASK_SYS_ID]
wbs: "1.5"
Recommended Milestones:
| Milestone | Trigger | Gate Criteria | |-----------|---------|---------------| | Requirements Approved | All requirements reviewed | Sign-off from sponsor | | Design Complete | Architecture and design reviewed | Technical review passed | | Development Complete | All features built | Code review passed, unit tests green | | Testing Complete | All test cycles done | No P1/P2 defects open | | Go-Live Ready | Deployment validated | Stakeholder approval obtained |
Apply estimation techniques to each task.
Estimation Methods:
| Method | When to Use | Approach | |--------|------------|----------| | Analogous | Similar past project exists | Compare to historical task durations | | Parametric | Quantifiable work units | Multiply unit count by per-unit effort | | Three-Point | Uncertainty is high | (Optimistic + 4*Likely + Pessimistic) / 6 | | Expert Judgment | Novel or complex work | Consult SME for estimate |
Apply estimates to tasks:
Tool: SN-Update-Record
Parameters:
table_name: pm_project_task
sys_id: [TASK_SYS_ID]
data:
estimated_work_duration: "16 hours"
planned_start_date: "2026-04-07"
planned_end_date: "2026-04-09"
work_notes: "Estimate based on three-point: Opt=12h, Likely=16h, Pess=24h. PERT=16.3h"
Match tasks to team members based on skills and availability.
MCP Approach:
Tool: SN-Query-Table
Parameters:
table_name: pm_resource_plan
query: project=[PROJECT_SYS_ID]^state=active
fields: sys_id,resource,role,planned_hours,actual_hours,remaining_hours,start_date,end_date
limit: 30
Tool: SN-Update-Record
Parameters:
table_name: pm_project_task
sys_id: [TASK_SYS_ID]
data:
assigned_to: [USER_SYS_ID]
assignment_group: [GROUP_SYS_ID]
Review the generated task structure for completeness and feasibility.
Validation Checklist:
TASK BREAKDOWN VALIDATION:
- [ ] All requirements have corresponding tasks
- [ ] No orphan tasks (every task has a parent or is top-level)
- [ ] Dependencies form a valid DAG (no circular dependencies)
- [ ] Critical path identified and reasonable
- [ ] All tasks have effort estimates
- [ ] All tasks have assigned resources
- [ ] Milestones placed at phase boundaries
- [ ] Resource loading does not exceed capacity
- [ ] Buffer/contingency included (10-20% of total effort)
- [ ] Task descriptions are clear and actionable
MCP Approach to verify:
Tool: SN-Query-Table
Parameters:
table_name: pm_project_task
query: project=[PROJECT_SYS_ID]^assigned_to=NULL^milestone=false
fields: number,short_description,wbs,state
limit: 100
Produce a summary of the generated task breakdown.
=== TASK BREAKDOWN SUMMARY ===
Project: [number] - [name]
Generated: [date]
STRUCTURE:
Phases: [count]
Work Packages: [count]
Tasks: [count]
Milestones: [count]
EFFORT SUMMARY:
Total Estimated Effort: [hours] hours
Total Duration: [days] business days
Critical Path Duration: [days] business days
RESOURCE ALLOCATION:
| Resource | Role | Allocated Hours | Utilization |
|----------|------|----------------|-------------|
| [name] | [role] | [hours] | [%] |
DEPENDENCY MAP:
[Task A] -> [Task B] -> [Task C] (Critical Path)
[Task D] -> [Task E] (Parallel Stream)
MILESTONES:
| Milestone | Date | Dependencies |
|-----------|------|-------------|
| [name] | [date] | [predecessor tasks] |
| Tool | Purpose | When to Use | |------|---------|-------------| | SN-Query-Table | Find existing tasks, resources, requirements | Discovery and validation | | SN-Create-Record | Create project tasks and milestones | Building the task breakdown | | SN-Update-Record | Set dependencies, assign resources, update estimates | Task configuration | | SN-Read-Record | Get project details and individual task records | Context gathering | | SN-Get-Table-Schema | Discover pm_project_task fields | Initial setup |
| Issue | Cause | Resolution |
|-------|-------|------------|
| Tasks not rolling up to parent | Parent reference not set | Verify parent field on child tasks points to correct parent sys_id |
| Duration calculation incorrect | Work calendar not configured | Check project work schedule; verify business days vs calendar days |
| Circular dependency error | Task A depends on B which depends on A | Review dependency chain; remove or restructure circular references |
| Resource over-allocation | Same person assigned overlapping tasks | Stagger task dates or reassign to balance workload |
| WBS numbering gaps | Tasks created out of order | Re-sequence WBS numbers after all tasks are created |
| Milestone showing duration | Duration field not set to zero | Update milestone tasks to set duration=0 and milestone=true |
Requirement: "Build a customer self-service portal with account management, ticket submission, and knowledge base search."
Generated Breakdown:
Phase 1: Design (2 weeks)
1.1 UX Research & Wireframes - 24h - UX Designer
1.2 Technical Architecture - 16h - Architect
1.3 API Design - 12h - Tech Lead
1.4 Design Review - MILESTONE
Phase 2: Development (4 weeks)
2.1 Account Management Module - 40h - Developer A
2.2 Ticket Submission Module - 32h - Developer B
2.3 KB Search Integration - 24h - Developer A
2.4 UI Implementation - 40h - Frontend Dev
2.5 Code Complete - MILESTONE
Phase 3: Testing (2 weeks)
3.1 Integration Testing - 24h - QA Engineer
3.2 UAT Execution - 16h - BA + Users
3.3 Performance Testing - 12h - QA Engineer
3.4 Test Complete - MILESTONE
Phase 4: Deployment (1 week)
4.1 Production Setup - 8h - DevOps
4.2 Data Migration - 12h - DBA
4.3 Go-Live - MILESTONE
Requirement: "Integrate ServiceNow ITSM with Jira for bi-directional incident synchronization."
Generated Breakdown:
Phase 1: Analysis (1 week)
1.1 Map field mappings SN <-> Jira - 8h - BA
1.2 Define sync rules and conflict resolution - 8h - Tech Lead
1.3 Requirements Signed Off - MILESTONE
Phase 2: Build (3 weeks)
2.1 Configure IntegrationHub spoke - 16h - Developer
2.2 Build SN-to-Jira sync flow - 24h - Developer
2.3 Build Jira-to-SN webhook handler - 24h - Developer
2.4 Error handling and retry logic - 12h - Developer
2.5 Integration Complete - MILESTONE
Phase 3: Validate (1 week)
3.1 End-to-end sync testing - 16h - QA
3.2 Edge case and error testing - 8h - QA
3.3 Validation Complete - MILESTONE
Phase 4: Rollout (3 days)
4.1 Production configuration - 4h - Admin
4.2 Historical data sync - 8h - Developer
4.3 Go-Live - MILESTONE
spm/cwm-doc-generation - Generate status reports from project dataspm/acceptance-criteria - Define acceptance criteria for tasksspm/agile-story-generation - Generate user stories from requirementsspm/project-insights - Analyze project performance metricsspm/planning-summarization - Summarize planning datatesting
Manage supplier onboarding, qualification, performance monitoring, and offboarding with auditable lifecycle controls
tools
Identify emerging risks, prioritize intake signals, and route candidates into formal GRC risk assessment workflows
documentation
Screen inbound documents for completeness, policy risk, and routing readiness before extraction or case workflows
testing
Generate concise task summaries with status, timeline, blockers, SLA risk, and recommended next actions