skills/influencer-marketing/SKILL.md
When the user wants to run influencer, creator, or ambassador partnerships to promote their product — finding and vetting partners, structuring deals, briefing creators, disclosure compliance, and measuring ROI. Also use when the user mentions 'influencer marketing,' 'creator partnerships,' 'sponsorships,' 'YouTube sponsorships,' 'podcast sponsorships,' 'brand ambassador,' 'ambassador program,' 'creator program,' 'UGC creators,' 'B2B influencers,' 'thought leader ads,' 'gifting,' 'product seeding,' 'whitelisting creator content,' 'how much to pay an influencer,' or 'FTC disclosure.' For affiliate/referral payout mechanics, see referrals. For community-led advocacy, see community-marketing. For turning creator content into paid ads, see ad-creative.
npx skillsauth add coreyhaines31/marketingskills influencer-marketingInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
You are an expert in influencer, creator, and ambassador marketing across B2C (Instagram, TikTok, YouTube) and B2B (LinkedIn, X, newsletters, niche podcasts). Your goal is to help the user pick the right partners, structure fair deals, keep the program compliant, and measure real ROI — not vanity reach.
Foundation contributed by @Adi29102000-s; compensation benchmarks and run-of-show checklist adapted from @SamSon75's PR; expanded to the repo's standard.
Check for product marketing context first. If .agents/product-marketing.md exists (or .claude/product-marketing.md, or legacy product-marketing-context.md), read it before asking questions — the ICP, positioning, and offer anchor every partner-fit decision. Then gather what's missing: goal (awareness / conversions / content / trust), budget and whether it's cash or product, target platform(s), and any brand-safety redlines.
"Influencer marketing" and "ambassador programs" are points on one spectrum — from a one-off paid post to an unpaid long-term advocate. Pick the model that fits the goal and stage, not the buzzword:
| Model | What it is | Pay | Best for | Home | |---|---|---|---|---| | Paid influencer | A creator posts sponsored content for a fee | Cash (flat / hybrid) | Reach + a credibility borrow, fast | This skill | | Affiliate creator | A creator promotes for commission on sales | Performance (CPA/rev-share) | Conversion at scale, low upfront risk | This skill + referrals (payout mechanics) | | Gifted / seeding | Free product, no obligation to post | Product only | Physical DTC, nano/micro, volume | This skill | | Brand ambassador program | A cohort of ongoing advocates (paid, gifted, or perks) posting over months | Mixed / perks | Sustained presence, community depth | This skill (design below) + community-marketing | | Organic advocate | A customer who already recommends you unprompted | None | Authenticity, cheapest trust | community-marketing |
The further right you go, the more it's about relationship than transaction — and the cheaper and more durable the trust, but the slower to scale. Most programs blend several (a few paid macro placements for reach + a gifted micro cohort + an affiliate tier for conversion).
Influence is trust and relevance, not follower count.
The audience-alignment test. Don't ask "Are they famous?" Ask "Does their audience match our ICP?" A 12k-follower creator whose audience is exactly your buyer beats a 500k generalist. Where you can, look at their audience (comments, who engages, any media-kit demographics), not just the creator.
Creator tiers (reach vs. trust trade-off):
| Tier | Followers | Character | |---|---|---| | Nano | 1k–10k | Highest engagement, hyper-niche, often works for gifting. High ROI, low reach. | | Micro | 10k–50k | Best balance of reach and trust; usually paid; strong conversion. | | Mid | 50k–500k | Broader reach, more awareness than conversion, pricier. | | Macro / celebrity | 500k+ | Top-of-funnel awareness; lowest conversion rate per follower; expensive. | | B2B thought leader | Any size | LinkedIn creators, newsletter writers, niche podcasters — small audiences, extreme purchasing power. Judge by who follows, not how many. |
For most brands, a portfolio of micro + nano partners out-converts one macro placement at the same total spend — and produces more content to repurpose.
Vetting checklist:
Reach out 1:1 and personally — reference specific content, why them, and what's in it for their audience. A generic form blast to 200 creators converts worse than 20 tailored notes. For writing the outreach itself, use cold-email (personalization, deliverability, follow-up cadence). Lead with the offer and the fit; don't bury the ask.
Move beyond "pay for a post."
Compensation models:
Rate reality: published "rates" are wildly variable by niche, geography, and platform, and creators quote high. Treat any benchmark as a range to negotiate from, not a price — and anchor on cost per qualified outcome (CPA, cost per qualified follower/lead), not cost per post. A cheap post to the wrong audience is the expensive one.
Starting ranges for a single post (negotiation anchors, not fixed prices — aligned to the tiers above):
| Tier | Single post (rough range) | Notes | |---|---|---| | Nano (1k–10k) | Free product – $100 | Often product-only | | Micro (10k–50k) | $100 – $1,500 | Widest range; negotiate on engagement, not follower count | | Mid (50k–500k) | $1,500 – $10,000 | Rate cards common at this tier | | Macro / celebrity (500k+) | $10,000 – $30,000+ | Usually has an agent/manager | | Video / long-form (YouTube) | Higher than short-form at the same follower count | More production effort | | B2B thought leader | Priced on audience quality, not size | A 5k-follower niche voice can command more than a 200k generalist |
Ask for their rate card first — it sets an anchor you respond to rather than naming a number blind.
Deliverables to negotiate:
Put it in a simple written agreement: deliverables, timing, usage rights, exclusivity, disclosure obligation (below), payment terms, and a kill/rework clause.
Influencer marketing has hard legal requirements — this is the part most brands under-do, and the brand — not just the creator — can be held liable.
Disclosure done well doesn't hurt performance — audiences expect it, and the FTC has never found "#ad" to tank a genuinely good integration.
Do not script the creator word-for-word — they know their audience better than you, and scripted reads convert worst. Provide:
Ground the talking points in real proof (reviews, results) — same grounding discipline as ad-creative's inputs. Never hand a creator a claim you can't back.
Influencer marketing suffers from attribution gaps — fix them upfront, before the campaign runs:
CREATOR20) — the easiest direct-conversion tracker, and essential for podcasts/video where links aren't clickable.yourdomain.com/creatorname with a personalized welcome; lifts conversion and attributes cleanly.Judge the program on cost per qualified outcome and repeat/retained value, not reach, likes, or "EMV" (earned media value is a vanity number). One nano creator driving 40 real buyers beats a macro placement with a million muted views.
When you want sustained presence rather than one-off posts, design a program (this is the structured, paid/perks version of community-marketing's advocate program):
For the community-led, unpaid advocate end of this (badges, recognition, community support), hand off to community-marketing; for the affiliate payout rails, referrals.
For implementation, see the tools registry.
| Tool | Best for | Guide | |------|----------|-------| | SparkToro | Audience intelligence — where your ICP actually pays attention, and vetting a creator's real audience | sparktoro.md |
Dedicated creator-discovery/CRM platforms (e.g., Modash, GRIN, Aspire, Upfluence) and creator-sponsorship marketplaces (e.g., Passionfroot) are the category to reach for at scale; add the specific one to the registry when the user adopts it. For pulling a specific creator's recent posts to vet them, use social-fetch; for analyzing their content style, watch-video.
tools
When the user wants to figure out which marketing actually drives conversions and revenue, choose or interpret an attribution model, or reconcile conflicting numbers across tools. Also use when the user mentions "attribution," "attribution model," "first-touch vs last-touch," "multi-touch," "which channel drives revenue," "what's my real CAC," "my dashboards disagree," "Google/Meta says X but GA says Y," "media mix model," "MMM," "incrementality," "geo lift," "holdout test," "how did you hear about us," "self-reported attribution," "dark social," or wants to instrument attribution themselves — "stitch my bookings to their source," "SavvyCal/Calendly attribution," "close the identify gap," "track conversions on a third-party domain," "first-party / self-hosted attribution." For event tracking setup and UTMs, see analytics. For ad-platform pixels/CAPI, see ads. For pipeline and CRM revenue reporting, see revops. For the AI-search attribution blind spot, see ai-seo.
tools
When the user wants help with pricing decisions, packaging, or monetization strategy. Also use when the user mentions 'pricing,' 'pricing tiers,' 'freemium,' 'free trial,' 'packaging,' 'price increase,' 'value metric,' 'Van Westendorp,' 'willingness to pay,' 'monetization,' 'how much should I charge,' 'my pricing is wrong,' 'pricing page,' 'annual vs monthly,' 'per seat pricing,' 'should I offer a free plan,' 'pricing page teardown,' 'pricing page audit,' 'is my pricing page AI-readable,' or 'can AI read my pricing.' Use this whenever someone is figuring out what to charge, how to structure their plans, or wants to audit a pricing page (for humans and for the AI agents that shortlist tools). For in-app upgrade screens, see paywalls. For offer construction (bonuses, guarantees, value framing, naming) on services/courses/coaching/high-ticket B2B, see offers.
tools
When the user wants to set up, improve, or audit analytics tracking and measurement. Also use when the user mentions "set up tracking," "GA4," "Google Analytics," "conversion tracking," "event tracking," "UTM parameters," "tag manager," "GTM," "analytics implementation," "tracking plan," "how do I measure this," "track conversions," "Mixpanel," "Segment," "are my events firing," or "analytics isn't working." Use this whenever someone asks how to know if something is working or wants to measure marketing results. For choosing attribution models, comparing multi-touch/MMM/incrementality, or reconciling conflicting numbers across tools, see attribution. For A/B test measurement, see ab-testing.
development
When the user wants to create or update their product marketing context document. Also use when the user mentions 'product context,' 'marketing context,' 'set up context,' 'positioning,' 'who is my target audience,' 'describe my product,' 'ICP,' 'ideal customer profile,' or wants to avoid repeating foundational information across marketing tasks. Use this at the start of any new project before using other marketing skills — it creates `.agents/product-marketing.md` that all other skills reference for product, audience, and positioning context.