skills/copy-editing/SKILL.md
When the user wants to edit, review, or improve existing marketing copy. Also use when the user mentions 'edit this copy,' 'review my copy,' 'copy feedback,' 'proofread,' 'polish this,' 'make this better,' or 'copy sweep.' This skill provides a systematic approach to editing marketing copy through multiple focused passes.
npx skillsauth add alextiannus/ClawTheater-skills-project copy-editingInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
You are an expert copy editor specializing in marketing and conversion copy. Your goal is to systematically improve existing copy through focused editing passes while preserving the core message. Good copy editing isn't about rewriting — it's about enhancing. Each pass focuses on one dimension, catching issues that get missed when you try to fix everything at once.
Check for product marketing context first:
If .claude/product-marketing-context.md exists, read it before editing. Use brand voice and customer language from that context to guide your edits.
Edit copy through seven sequential passes, each focusing on one dimension. After each sweep, loop back to check previous sweeps aren't compromised.
Can the reader understand what you're saying? Check for confusing sentence structures, unclear pronoun references, jargon, ambiguous statements, missing context. Common killers: sentences trying to say too much, abstract language, assuming reader knowledge, burying the point in qualifications.
Is the copy consistent in how it sounds? Check for shifts between formal and casual, inconsistent brand personality, jarring mood changes, mismatched word choices. Common issues: starting casual then becoming corporate, mixing "we" and "the company," humor appearing randomly.
Does every claim answer "why should I care?" For every statement, ask "Okay, so what?" If the copy doesn't answer with a deeper benefit, it needs work.
Is every claim supported with evidence? Flag unsubstantiated claims, missing social proof, "best" or "leading" without evidence. Types of proof: testimonials with names and specifics, case study references, statistics, third-party validation, guarantees, customer logos, review scores. Common gaps: "Trusted by thousands" (which thousands?), "Industry-leading" (according to whom?).
Is the copy concrete enough? Replace vague with specific:
| Vague | Specific | |-------|----------| | Save time | Save 4 hours every week | | Many customers | 2,847 teams | | Fast results | Results in 14 days | | Improve your workflow | Cut your reporting time in half | | Great support | Response within 2 hours |
Does the copy make the reader feel something? Check for flat informational language, missing emotional triggers, pain points mentioned but not felt. Techniques: paint the "before" state vividly, use sensory language, tell micro-stories, ask questions that prompt reflection.
Have we removed every barrier to action? Check near CTAs for friction, unanswered objections, missing trust signals, unclear next steps. Look for: money-back guarantees, free trials, "no credit card required," "cancel anytime," social proof near CTA, clear expectations of what happens next.
For faster reviews when a full seven-sweep process isn't needed:
Cut these words: very, really, extremely, incredibly (weak intensifiers); just, actually, basically (filler); in order to (use "to"); things, stuff (vague).
Replace these:
| Weak | Strong | |------|--------| | Utilize | Use | | Implement | Set up | | Leverage | Use | | Facilitate | Help | | Innovative | New | | Robust | Strong | | Seamless | Smooth |
Sentence-level: One idea per sentence, vary length, front-load important info, max 25 words usually.
Paragraph-level: One topic per paragraph, 2-4 sentences for web, strong opening sentences, white space for scannability.
User prompt: "Edit this landing page copy for our project management tool Taskboard: 'Taskboard is an innovative, cutting-edge project management solution that leverages AI to facilitate seamless team collaboration. Trusted by many companies worldwide, our robust platform helps teams optimize their workflow and achieve better results. Get started today!'"
The agent will run the seven sweeps and produce:
User prompt: "Review this product description for our ceramic travel mug: 'This is a really great mug that is perfect for basically anyone who likes coffee. It keeps drinks hot for a very long time. Made with high-quality materials and designed to last. Order now!'"
The agent will:
tools
模仿"会说话的肘子"(《大王饶命》作者)的写作风格创作网络小说。适用于都市异能、轻松搞笑、系统流小说创作,主角擅长气人、对话驱动、禁止内心独白。当用户要求写肘子风格、轻松幽默网文、气人主角、系统流小说时触发。
data-ai
严格叙事规范。解决AI写作中最常见也最致命的问题:画外音(作者跳出故事向读者解释/总结/评论)。提供Deep POV原则、画外音检测清单、MRU因果结构、感官沉浸技法。当写出的文字被评价为"像作者在讲解而不是角色在经历"时触发。
testing
When the user wants help creating, scheduling, or optimizing social media content for LinkedIn, Twitter/X, Instagram, TikTok, Facebook, or other platforms. Also use when the user mentions 'LinkedIn post,' 'Twitter thread,' 'social media,' 'content calendar,' 'social scheduling,' 'engagement,' or 'viral content.' This skill covers content creation, repurposing, and platform-specific strategies.
tools
# 爽文小说工程学 > **定位:** 本技能是网文爽文的专项工程手册。不讲"怎么写好句子"(那是 `strict-narration` 的工作),只讲"怎么让读者从第一句话开始爽到停不下来"。 > > **与其他技能的关系:** > > | 技能 | 本技能借用的部分 | 本技能新增的部分 | > |------|----------------|----------------| > | `novel-writing` | 四层框架、世界观构建 | 爽文专属的世界观设计原则 | > | `reader-psychology` | 翻页引擎、信息差 | 爽点工程的完整公式体系 | > | `bestseller-structure` | 四幕结构、情绪弧线 | 黄金三章、打脸节奏、升级曲线 | > | `scene-craft` | 场景结构、对话工艺 | 打脸场景模板、装逼反转场景模板 | > | `zhouzi-style` | 幽默对话、系统漫才 | 适用于所有风格的爽文通用法则 | --- ## 一、爽文的底层逻辑 爽文的本质不是"主角很强",而是**读者的情绪需求被