.agent/skills/skills/writing-plans/SKILL.md
Use when you have a spec or requirements for a multi-step task, before touching code
npx skillsauth add admin-baked/bakedbot-for-brands writing-plansInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Write comprehensive implementation plans assuming the engineer has zero context for our codebase and questionable taste. Document everything they need to know: which files to touch for each task, code, testing, docs they might need to check, how to test it. Give them the whole plan as bite-sized tasks. DRY. YAGNI. TDD. Frequent commits.
Assume they are a skilled developer, but know almost nothing about our toolset or problem domain. Assume they don't know good test design very well.
Announce at start: "I'm using the writing-plans skill to create the implementation plan."
Context: This should be run in a dedicated worktree (created by brainstorming skill).
Save plans to: docs/plans/YYYY-MM-DD-<feature-name>.md
Each step is one action (2-5 minutes):
Every plan MUST start with this header:
# [Feature Name] Implementation Plan
> **For Claude:** REQUIRED SUB-SKILL: Use superpowers:executing-plans to implement this plan task-by-task.
**Goal:** [One sentence describing what this builds]
**Architecture:** [2-3 sentences about approach]
**Tech Stack:** [Key technologies/libraries]
---
### Task N: [Component Name]
**Files:**
- Create: `exact/path/to/file.py`
- Modify: `exact/path/to/existing.py:123-145`
- Test: `tests/exact/path/to/test.py`
**Step 1: Write the failing test**
```python
def test_specific_behavior():
result = function(input)
assert result == expected
Step 2: Run test to verify it fails
Run: pytest tests/path/test.py::test_name -v
Expected: FAIL with "function not defined"
Step 3: Write minimal implementation
def function(input):
return expected
Step 4: Run test to verify it passes
Run: pytest tests/path/test.py::test_name -v
Expected: PASS
Step 5: Commit
git add tests/path/test.py src/path/file.py
git commit -m "feat: add specific feature"
## Remember
- Exact file paths always
- Complete code in plan (not "add validation")
- Exact commands with expected output
- Reference relevant skills with @ syntax
- DRY, YAGNI, TDD, frequent commits
## Execution Handoff
After saving the plan, offer execution choice:
**"Plan complete and saved to `docs/plans/<filename>.md`. Two execution options:**
**1. Subagent-Driven (this session)** - I dispatch fresh subagent per task, review between tasks, fast iteration
**2. Parallel Session (separate)** - Open new session with executing-plans, batch execution with checkpoints
**Which approach?"**
**If Subagent-Driven chosen:**
- **REQUIRED SUB-SKILL:** Use superpowers:subagent-driven-development
- Stay in this session
- Fresh subagent per task + code review
**If Parallel Session chosen:**
- Guide them to open new session in worktree
- **REQUIRED SUB-SKILL:** New session uses superpowers:executing-plans
testing
--- name: executive-brief description: Produce a concise executive brief or portfolio digest for a super user or operator — use when summarizing multi-account performance, cross-org anomalies, top actions needed, or weekly business status for leadership review. Trigger phrases: "executive summary", "weekly brief", "portfolio digest", "top actions this week", "what needs my attention", "board update", "cross-account summary". version: 0.1.0 owner: platform agent_owner: pops allowed_roles: - sup
development
--- name: anomaly-to-action-memo description: Interpret a detected anomaly or signal and produce a decision-ready action memo — use when an alert, metric deviation, or operational signal needs to be turned into a prioritized recommendation with evidence, owner, and next step. Trigger phrases: "what does this anomaly mean", "something looks off", "explain this alert", "revenue is down", "traffic dropped", "flag this for review", "what should we do about this". version: 0.1.0 owner: ops-intelligen
testing
--- name: brand-voice description: Apply BakedBot brand voice standards to any customer-facing content — use when generating or reviewing copy that must match a dispensary or brand's approved tone, language patterns, and messaging constraints. Trigger phrases: "does this match our voice", "write in our brand voice", "on-brand copy", "brand guidelines", "tone check". version: 0.1.0 owner: platform agent_owner: craig allowed_roles: - super_user - dispensary_operator - brand_operator outputs:
testing
--- name: sell-through-partner-analysis description: Analyze which retail dispensary partners are selling through a grower's products effectively, identify top performers and laggards, and produce a prioritized partner action plan. Use when a grower wants to know where their products move fastest, which partners need attention, and where to focus wholesale sales effort. Trigger phrases: "which partners are selling our product", "sell-through analysis", "partner performance", "where is inventory