.agent/skills/skills/verification-before-completion/SKILL.md
Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs - requires running verification commands and confirming output before making any success claims; evidence before assertions always
npx skillsauth add admin-baked/bakedbot-for-brands verification-before-completionInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Claiming work is complete without verification is dishonesty, not efficiency.
Core principle: Evidence before claims, always.
Violating the letter of this rule is violating the spirit of this rule.
NO COMPLETION CLAIMS WITHOUT FRESH VERIFICATION EVIDENCE
If you haven't run the verification command in this message, you cannot claim it passes.
BEFORE claiming any status or expressing satisfaction:
1. IDENTIFY: What command proves this claim?
2. RUN: Execute the FULL command (fresh, complete)
3. READ: Full output, check exit code, count failures
4. VERIFY: Does output confirm the claim?
- If NO: State actual status with evidence
- If YES: State claim WITH evidence
5. ONLY THEN: Make the claim
Skip any step = lying, not verifying
| Claim | Requires | Not Sufficient | |-------|----------|----------------| | Tests pass | Test command output: 0 failures | Previous run, "should pass" | | Linter clean | Linter output: 0 errors | Partial check, extrapolation | | Build succeeds | Build command: exit 0 | Linter passing, logs look good | | Bug fixed | Test original symptom: passes | Code changed, assumed fixed | | Regression test works | Red-green cycle verified | Test passes once | | Agent completed | VCS diff shows changes | Agent reports "success" | | Requirements met | Line-by-line checklist | Tests passing |
| Excuse | Reality | |--------|---------| | "Should work now" | RUN the verification | | "I'm confident" | Confidence ≠ evidence | | "Just this once" | No exceptions | | "Linter passed" | Linter ≠ compiler | | "Agent said success" | Verify independently | | "I'm tired" | Exhaustion ≠ excuse | | "Partial check is enough" | Partial proves nothing | | "Different words so rule doesn't apply" | Spirit over letter |
Tests:
✅ [Run test command] [See: 34/34 pass] "All tests pass"
❌ "Should pass now" / "Looks correct"
Regression tests (TDD Red-Green):
✅ Write → Run (pass) → Revert fix → Run (MUST FAIL) → Restore → Run (pass)
❌ "I've written a regression test" (without red-green verification)
Build:
✅ [Run build] [See: exit 0] "Build passes"
❌ "Linter passed" (linter doesn't check compilation)
Requirements:
✅ Re-read plan → Create checklist → Verify each → Report gaps or completion
❌ "Tests pass, phase complete"
Agent delegation:
✅ Agent reports success → Check VCS diff → Verify changes → Report actual state
❌ Trust agent report
From 24 failure memories:
ALWAYS before:
Rule applies to:
No shortcuts for verification.
Run the command. Read the output. THEN claim the result.
This is non-negotiable.
testing
--- name: executive-brief description: Produce a concise executive brief or portfolio digest for a super user or operator — use when summarizing multi-account performance, cross-org anomalies, top actions needed, or weekly business status for leadership review. Trigger phrases: "executive summary", "weekly brief", "portfolio digest", "top actions this week", "what needs my attention", "board update", "cross-account summary". version: 0.1.0 owner: platform agent_owner: pops allowed_roles: - sup
development
--- name: anomaly-to-action-memo description: Interpret a detected anomaly or signal and produce a decision-ready action memo — use when an alert, metric deviation, or operational signal needs to be turned into a prioritized recommendation with evidence, owner, and next step. Trigger phrases: "what does this anomaly mean", "something looks off", "explain this alert", "revenue is down", "traffic dropped", "flag this for review", "what should we do about this". version: 0.1.0 owner: ops-intelligen
testing
--- name: brand-voice description: Apply BakedBot brand voice standards to any customer-facing content — use when generating or reviewing copy that must match a dispensary or brand's approved tone, language patterns, and messaging constraints. Trigger phrases: "does this match our voice", "write in our brand voice", "on-brand copy", "brand guidelines", "tone check". version: 0.1.0 owner: platform agent_owner: craig allowed_roles: - super_user - dispensary_operator - brand_operator outputs:
testing
--- name: sell-through-partner-analysis description: Analyze which retail dispensary partners are selling through a grower's products effectively, identify top performers and laggards, and produce a prioritized partner action plan. Use when a grower wants to know where their products move fastest, which partners need attention, and where to focus wholesale sales effort. Trigger phrases: "which partners are selling our product", "sell-through analysis", "partner performance", "where is inventory