skills/dev-workflow/greploop/SKILL.md
Iteratively improves a PR (GitHub) or MR (GitLab) until Greptile gives it a 5/5 confidence score with zero unresolved comments. Triggers Greptile review, fixes all actionable comments, pushes, re-triggers review, and repeats. Use when the user wants to fully optimize a PR/MR against Greptile's code review standards.
npx skillsauth add The-Utopia-Studio/skills greploopInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Iteratively fix a PR/MR until Greptile gives a perfect review: 5/5 confidence, zero unresolved comments.
Inspect the git remote URL to determine whether this is a GitHub or GitLab repository:
REMOTE_URL=$(git remote get-url origin)
if echo "$REMOTE_URL" | grep -qi "gitlab"; then
VCS="gitlab"
else
VCS="github"
fi
For self-hosted GitLab instances whose hostname doesn't contain "gitlab", the user can override by passing --vcs gitlab as an input.
GitHub:
gh pr view --json number,headRefName -q '{number: .number, branch: .headRefName}'
GitLab:
glab mr view --output json | jq '{iid: .iid, branch: .source_branch}'
Switch to the PR/MR branch if not already on it.
Key field differences:
number, headRefName, headRefOidiid, source_branch, shaRepeat the following cycle. Max 5 iterations to avoid runaway loops.
Push the latest changes (if any):
git push
Wait for checks to start after push:
sleep 5
GitHub — check if Greptile is already running before posting a new trigger comment:
GREPTILE_STATE=$(gh pr checks <PR_NUMBER> --json name,state | jq -r '.[] | select(.name | test("greptile"; "i")) | .state')
If Greptile is not already running (PENDING or IN_PROGRESS), request a fresh review:
if [ "$GREPTILE_STATE" != "PENDING" ] && [ "$GREPTILE_STATE" != "IN_PROGRESS" ]; then
gh pr comment <PR_NUMBER> --body "@greptile review"
fi
Then poll for the Greptile check run to complete:
HEAD_SHA=$(gh pr view <PR_NUMBER> --json headRefOid -q .headRefOid)
while true; do
GREPTILE_CHECK=$(gh api "repos/{owner}/{repo}/commits/$HEAD_SHA/check-runs" \
--jq '.check_runs[] | select(.name | test("greptile"; "i"))' 2>/dev/null)
if [ -z "$GREPTILE_CHECK" ]; then
echo "Waiting for Greptile check to appear..."
sleep 5
continue
fi
STATUS=$(echo "$GREPTILE_CHECK" | jq -r '.status // "completed"')
CONCLUSION=$(echo "$GREPTILE_CHECK" | jq -r '.conclusion // "pending"')
if [ "$STATUS" = "completed" ]; then
if [ "$CONCLUSION" = "success" ]; then
echo "Greptile check passed!"
else
echo "Greptile check completed with: $CONCLUSION"
fi
break
fi
echo "Waiting for Greptile... (status: $STATUS)"
sleep 10
done
GitLab — check if Greptile is already running before posting a trigger comment:
PIPELINES=$(glab api "projects/:fullpath/merge_requests/<MR_IID>/pipelines")
GREPTILE_RUNNING=$(echo "$PIPELINES" | jq '[.[] | select(.status == "running" or .status == "pending")] | length')
If no pipeline is running, post a trigger comment:
if [ "$GREPTILE_RUNNING" = "0" ]; then
glab mr note <MR_IID> --message "@greptile review"
fi
Then poll for the Greptile pipeline job to complete (see GitLab API reference):
HEAD_SHA=$(glab mr view <MR_IID> --output json | jq -r '.sha')
while true; do
PIPELINES=$(glab api "projects/:fullpath/merge_requests/<MR_IID>/pipelines")
# Find the most recent pipeline for this SHA
PIPELINE_ID=$(echo "$PIPELINES" | jq -r --arg sha "$HEAD_SHA" \
'[.[] | select(.sha == $sha)] | sort_by(.id) | last | .id // empty')
if [ -z "$PIPELINE_ID" ]; then
echo "Waiting for Greptile pipeline to appear..."
sleep 5
continue
fi
JOBS=$(glab api "projects/:fullpath/pipelines/$PIPELINE_ID/jobs")
GREPTILE_JOB=$(echo "$JOBS" | jq '.[] | select(.name | test("greptile"; "i"))')
if [ -z "$GREPTILE_JOB" ]; then
echo "Waiting for Greptile job to appear..."
sleep 5
continue
fi
JOB_STATUS=$(echo "$GREPTILE_JOB" | jq -r '.status')
if [ "$JOB_STATUS" = "success" ] || [ "$JOB_STATUS" = "failed" ] || [ "$JOB_STATUS" = "canceled" ]; then
echo "Greptile job completed with: $JOB_STATUS"
break
fi
echo "Waiting for Greptile... (status: $JOB_STATUS)"
sleep 10
done
Greptile may surface its score in two places — check both:
GitHub:
1. PR description (body):
gh pr view <PR_NUMBER> --json body -q '.body'
2. PR reviews:
gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/<PR_NUMBER>/reviews
Look for the most recent entry from greptile-apps[bot] or greptile-apps-staging[bot].
GitLab:
1. MR description (body):
glab mr view <MR_IID> --output json | jq -r '.description'
2. MR notes (comments):
glab api "projects/:fullpath/merge_requests/<MR_IID>/notes"
Filter for notes from the Greptile bot user (check the author.username field — the exact username may vary per installation; verify on first run).
For both platforms, parse the text for:
3/5 or 5/5 (or Confidence: 3/5).Use whichever source has the most recent score.
Also fetch all unresolved inline comments:
GitHub:
gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/<PR_NUMBER>/comments
GitLab:
glab api "projects/:fullpath/merge_requests/<MR_IID>/discussions"
Filter to DiffNote type discussions (notes[0].type == "DiffNote") from Greptile that are on the latest commit and not yet resolved ("resolved": false).
Stop the loop if any of these are true:
For each unresolved Greptile comment:
GitHub — fetch unresolved review threads and resolve all that have been addressed (see GraphQL reference):
gh api graphql -f query='
query($cursor: String) {
repository(owner: "OWNER", name: "REPO") {
pullRequest(number: PR_NUMBER) {
reviewThreads(first: 100, after: $cursor) {
pageInfo { hasNextPage endCursor }
nodes {
id
isResolved
comments(first: 1) {
nodes { body path author { login } }
}
}
}
}
}
}'
Resolve addressed threads:
gh api graphql -f query='
mutation {
t1: resolveReviewThread(input: {threadId: "ID1"}) { thread { isResolved } }
t2: resolveReviewThread(input: {threadId: "ID2"}) { thread { isResolved } }
}'
GitLab — fetch unresolved discussions and resolve each one (see GitLab API reference):
glab api "projects/:fullpath/merge_requests/<MR_IID>/discussions?per_page=100"
Filter for "resolved": false discussions. Then resolve each by its id:
glab api --method PUT \
"projects/:fullpath/merge_requests/<MR_IID>/discussions/<DISCUSSION_ID>" \
--field resolved=true
Repeat for each unresolved discussion ID. (GitLab has no batch resolution — loop through each one.)
git add -A
git commit -m "address greptile review feedback (greploop iteration N)"
git push
Wait for checks to start after push:
sleep 5
Then go back to step A.
After exiting the loop, summarize:
| Field | Value | | ------------------ | ---------- | | Platform | GitHub / GitLab | | Iterations | N | | Final confidence | X/5 | | Comments resolved | N | | Remaining comments | N (if any) |
If the loop exited due to max iterations, list any remaining unresolved comments and suggest next steps.
Greploop complete.
Platform: GitHub
Iterations: 2
Confidence: 5/5
Resolved: 7 comments
Remaining: 0
If not fully resolved:
Greploop stopped after 5 iterations.
Platform: GitLab
Confidence: 4/5
Resolved: 12 comments
Remaining: 2
Remaining issues:
- src/auth.ts:45 — "Consider rate limiting this endpoint"
- src/db.ts:112 — "Missing index on user_id column"
development
Create professional equity research earnings update reports (8-12 pages, 3,000-5,000 words) analyzing quarterly results for companies already under coverage. Fast-turnaround format focusing on beat/miss analysis, key metrics, updated estimates, and revised thesis. Includes 1-3 summary tables and 8-12 charts. Use when user requests "earnings update", "quarterly update", "earnings analysis", "Q1/Q2/Q3/Q4 results", or post-earnings report.
development
Updates a presentation with new numbers — quarterly refreshes, earnings updates, comp rolls, rebased market data. Use whenever the user asks to "update the deck with Q4 numbers", "refresh the comps", "roll this forward", "swap in the new earnings", "change all the $485M to $512M", or any request to swap figures across an existing deck without rebuilding it.
development
Real DCF (Discounted Cash Flow) model creation for equity valuation. Retrieves financial data from SEC filings and analyst reports, builds comprehensive cash flow projections with proper WACC calculations, performs sensitivity analysis, and outputs professional Excel models with executive summaries. Use when users need to value a company using DCF methodology, request intrinsic value analysis, or ask for detailed financial modeling with growth projections and terminal value calculations.
tools
Build professional financial services data packs from various sources including CIMs, offering memorandums, SEC filings, web search, or MCP servers. Extract, normalize, and standardize financial data into investment committee-ready Excel workbooks with consistent structure, proper formatting, and documented assumptions. Use for M&A due diligence, private equity analysis, investment committee materials, and standardizing financial reporting across portfolio companies. Do not use for simple financial calculations or working with already-completed data packs.