plugins/utopia-studio-cobuild-fundraising/skills/financial-unit-economics/SKILL.md
Analyzes profitability per customer, product, or transaction to determine business model viability and scalability. Covers CAC, LTV, contribution margin, cohort analysis, and growth-readiness assessment. Use when evaluating business model viability, validating startup metrics (CAC, LTV, payback period), making pricing decisions, comparing business models, or when user mentions unit economics, CAC/LTV ratio, contribution margin, customer profitability, or break-even analysis.
npx skillsauth add The-Utopia-Studio/skills financial-unit-economicsInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Scenario: SaaS startup, $100/month subscription
Copy this checklist and track your progress:
Unit Economics Analysis Progress:
- [ ] Step 1: Define the unit
- [ ] Step 2: Calculate CAC
- [ ] Step 3: Calculate LTV
- [ ] Step 4: Assess contribution margin
- [ ] Step 5: Analyze cohorts
- [ ] Step 6: Interpret and recommend
Step 1: Define the unit
What is your unit of analysis? (Customer, product SKU, transaction, subscription). See resources/template.md.
Step 2: Calculate CAC
Total acquisition costs (sales + marketing) ÷ new units acquired. Break down by channel if applicable. See resources/template.md and resources/methodology.md.
Step 3: Calculate LTV
Revenue over unit lifetime minus variable costs. Use cohort data for retention/churn. See resources/template.md and resources/methodology.md.
Step 4: Assess contribution margin
(Revenue - Variable Costs) ÷ Revenue. Identify levers to improve margin. See resources/template.md and resources/methodology.md.
Step 5: Analyze cohorts
Track retention, LTV, payback by customer cohort (acquisition month/channel/segment). See resources/template.md and resources/methodology.md.
Step 6: Interpret and recommend
Assess LTV/CAC ratio, payback period, cash efficiency. Make recommendations (pricing, channels, growth). See resources/template.md and resources/methodology.md.
Validate using resources/evaluators/rubric_financial_unit_economics.json. Minimum standard: Average score ≥ 3.5.
Pattern 1: SaaS Subscription Model
Pattern 2: E-commerce / Transactional
Pattern 3: Marketplace / Platform
Pattern 4: Freemium / PLG (Product-Led Growth)
Pattern 5: Enterprise / High-Touch Sales
Fully-loaded CAC: Include all acquisition costs (sales salaries, marketing spend, tools, overhead allocation). Excluding sales team salaries is a common miss that inflates perceived economics.
True variable costs: Only include costs that scale with each unit (COGS, hosting per user, transaction fees). Exclude fixed costs (rent, core engineering). Accurate margins are essential for LTV.
Cohort-based LTV: Early cohorts are not the same as recent cohorts. Track retention curves by cohort. Base LTV on observed retention, not assumptions.
Use conservative time horizons: LTV is a prediction. For new products with limited data, weight recent cohorts more heavily and avoid projecting far beyond observed behavior.
Optimize both payback and LTV/CAC: High LTV/CAC but long payback (>18 months) strains cash. Fast payback (<6 months) allows rapid reinvestment.
Analyze at channel level: Blended metrics hide the truth. CAC and LTV vary by channel (paid search vs. referral vs. content). Break down separately to optimize spend.
Retention drives LTV exponentially: Improving monthly churn from 5% to 4% increases LTV by 25%. Retention improvements typically matter more than acquisition improvements.
Gross margin floor: SaaS needs >=60% gross margin, e-commerce >=40%, to be viable. Low margin means even high LTV/CAC ratios yield poor cash flow.
Common pitfalls:
Key formulas:
CAC = (Sales + Marketing Costs) ÷ New Customers Acquired
LTV (subscription) = ARPU × Gross Margin % ÷ Monthly Churn Rate
LTV (transactional) = AOV × Purchase Frequency × Gross Margin % × Lifetime (years)
Contribution Margin % = (Revenue - Variable Costs) ÷ Revenue
LTV/CAC Ratio = Lifetime Value ÷ Customer Acquisition Cost
Payback Period (months) = CAC ÷ (Monthly Revenue × Gross Margin %)
CAC Payback (months) = S&M Spend ÷ (New ARR × Gross Margin %)
Gross Margin % = (Revenue - COGS) ÷ Revenue
Customer Lifetime (months) = 1 ÷ Monthly Churn Rate
MRR (Monthly Recurring Revenue) = Sum of all monthly subscriptions
ARR (Annual Recurring Revenue) = MRR × 12
ARPU (Average Revenue Per User) = Total Revenue ÷ Total Users
NRR (Net Revenue Retention) = (Starting ARR + Expansion - Contraction - Churn) ÷ Starting ARR
Benchmarks (varies by stage and industry):
| Metric | Good | Acceptable | Poor | |--------|------|------------|------| | LTV/CAC Ratio | ≥5:1 | 3:1 - 5:1 | <3:1 | | Payback Period | <6 months | 6-12 months | >18 months | | Gross Margin (SaaS) | ≥80% | 60-80% | <60% | | Gross Margin (E-commerce) | ≥50% | 40-50% | <40% | | Monthly Churn (B2C SaaS) | <3% | 3-7% | >7% | | Monthly Churn (B2B SaaS) | <1% | 1-3% | >3% | | CAC Payback (SaaS) | <12 months | 12-18 months | >18 months | | NRR (SaaS) | ≥120% | 100-120% | <100% |
Decision framework:
| LTV/CAC | Payback | Recommendation | |---------|---------|----------------| | <1:1 | Any | Stop: Losing money on every customer. Fix model or pivot. | | 1:1 - 2:1 | >12 months | Caution: Marginal economics. Don't scale yet. Improve retention or reduce CAC. | | 2:1 - 3:1 | 6-12 months | Optimize: Unit economics acceptable. Focus on improving before scaling. | | 3:1 - 5:1 | <12 months | Scale: Good economics. Can profitably invest in growth. | | >5:1 | <6 months | Aggressive scale: Excellent economics. Raise capital, increase spend rapidly. |
Inputs required:
Outputs produced:
unit-economics-analysis.md: Full analysis with CAC, LTV, ratios, cohort breakdownscohort-retention-table.csv: Retention curves by cohortchannel-profitability.csv: CAC and LTV by acquisition channelrecommendations.md: Pricing, channel, growth recommendations based on metricsdata-ai
Raw mechanical interfaces fusing Swiss typographic print with military terminal aesthetics. Rigid grids, extreme type scale contrast, utilitarian color, analog degradation effects. For data-heavy dashboards, portfolios, or editorial sites that need to feel like declassified blueprints.
development
Teaches the AI to design like a high-end agency. Defines the exact fonts, spacing, shadows, card structures, and animations that make a website feel expensive. Blocks all the common defaults that make AI designs look cheap or generic.
development
Overrides default LLM truncation behavior. Enforces complete code generation, bans placeholder patterns, and handles token-limit splits cleanly. Apply to any task requiring exhaustive, unabridged output.
development
Senior UI/UX Engineer. Architect digital interfaces overriding default LLM biases. Enforces metric-based rules, strict component architecture, CSS hardware acceleration, and balanced design engineering.