.agents/skills/clarify/SKILL.md
Improve unclear UX copy, error messages, microcopy, labels, and instructions to make interfaces easier to understand. Use when the user mentions confusing text, unclear labels, bad error messages, hard-to-follow instructions, or wanting better UX writing.
npx skillsauth add youranreus/note clarifyInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Identify and improve unclear, confusing, or poorly written interface text to make the product easier to understand and use.
Invoke /impeccable — it contains design principles, anti-patterns, and the Context Gathering Protocol. Follow the protocol before proceeding — if no design context exists yet, you MUST run /impeccable teach first. Additionally gather: audience technical level and users' mental state in context.
Identify what makes the text unclear or ineffective:
Find clarity problems:
Understand the context:
CRITICAL: Clear copy helps users succeed. Unclear copy creates frustration, errors, and support tickets.
Create a strategy for clearer communication:
IMPORTANT: Good UX writing is invisible. Users should understand immediately without noticing the words.
Refine text across these common areas:
Bad: "Error 403: Forbidden" Good: "You don't have permission to view this page. Contact your admin for access."
Bad: "Invalid input" Good: "Email addresses need an @ symbol. Try: [email protected]"
Principles:
Bad: "DOB (MM/DD/YYYY)" Good: "Date of birth" (with placeholder showing format)
Bad: "Enter value here" Good: "Your email address" or "Company name"
Principles:
Bad: "Click here" | "Submit" | "OK" Good: "Create account" | "Save changes" | "Got it, thanks"
Principles:
Bad: "This is the username field" Good: "Choose a username. You can change this later in Settings."
Principles:
Bad: "No items" Good: "No projects yet. Create your first project to get started."
Principles:
Bad: "Success" Good: "Settings saved! Your changes will take effect immediately."
Principles:
Bad: "Loading..." (for 30+ seconds) Good: "Analyzing your data... this usually takes 30-60 seconds"
Principles:
Bad: "Are you sure?" Good: "Delete 'Project Alpha'? This can't be undone."
Principles:
Bad: Generic labels like "Items" | "Things" | "Stuff" Good: Specific labels like "Your projects" | "Team members" | "Settings"
Principles:
Every piece of copy should follow these rules:
NEVER:
Test that copy improvements work:
Remember: You're a clarity expert with excellent communication skills. Write like you're explaining to a smart friend who's unfamiliar with the product. Be clear, be helpful, be human.
tools
Post-epic review to extract lessons and assess success. Use when the user says "run a retrospective" or "lets retro the epic [epic]"
development
Implements any user intent, requirement, story, bug fix or change request by producing clean working code artifacts that follow the project's existing architecture, patterns and conventions. Use when the user wants to build, fix, tweak, refactor, add or modify any code, component or feature.
testing
Generate end to end automated tests for existing features. Use when the user says "create qa automated tests for [feature]"
development
Execute story implementation following a context filled story spec file. Use when the user says "dev this story [story file]" or "implement the next story in the sprint plan"