skills/ux-heuristic-review/SKILL.md
Evaluates implementation against usability heuristics — Nielsen's 10, Norman's principles, Krug's laws
npx skillsauth add xoai/sage ux-heuristic-reviewInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Evaluates the implementation against usability heuristics. Runs ALONGSIDE the
core quality-review skill at the review phase. When installed, this review
is mandatory — it cannot be skipped by the agent.
Evaluate the implementation against the four heuristics most likely to catch user-facing failures. Takes ~2 minutes per task.
Evaluate against all 10 Nielsen heuristics plus Norman's design principles. Takes ~10 minutes per major feature.
H2: Real-World Match — Does the interface use the user's language? Are icons and metaphors recognizable? Is information organized the way users think?
H4: Consistency — Are the same actions called the same thing everywhere? Do similar elements behave the same way? Does it follow platform conventions?
H6: Recognition over Recall — Are all available actions visible? Do forms show expected formats? Can users see previous selections when making new ones?
H7: Flexibility — Are there keyboard shortcuts for frequent actions? Can expert users bypass introductory steps? Does it remember preferences?
H8: Minimalism — Is there unnecessary text? Are visual elements serving a purpose? Is the visual hierarchy clear?
H10: Help — Is contextual help available for complex features? Are tooltips concise and useful?
In addition to Nielsen's heuristics, check:
Each finding gets a severity:
| Severity | Definition | Action | |----------|-----------|--------| | Catastrophic | User loses data or can't complete primary task | MUST fix before merge | | Major | User significantly confused or frustrated | SHOULD fix before merge | | Minor | User notices oddity but works around it | Fix in next iteration | | Cosmetic | Violates principle but minimal user impact | Note for polish |
## UX Heuristic Review: [feature name]
Date: [date]
Mode: [BUILD light / ARCHITECT full]
### Findings
1. [H9 - MAJOR] Error message on login form says "401 Unauthorized"
→ Should say: "Wrong email or password. Check your details and try again."
→ Fix: Update error handler in login-form.tsx
2. [H1 - CATASTROPHIC] No loading state on payment submission
→ User clicks "Pay" and sees no response for 3-5 seconds
→ Fix: Add loading spinner to submit button, disable during processing
### Summary
- Catastrophic: 1 (must fix)
- Major: 1 (should fix)
- GATE RESULT: FAIL (catastrophic finding blocks merge)
heuristic-evaluation.md — Full heuristic descriptions and checkpointsusability-principles.md — Krug's laws and Norman's principleserror-and-recovery-design.md — Error taxonomy for H5/H9 evaluationtesting
Root cause diagnosis with evidence, Reproducing test, Minimal patch
tools
Session resumption with context
tools
Configure Sage preset and project settings. Switch between base, startup, enterprise, or opensource constitution presets. Use when the user says "configure sage", "change preset", or "sage settings".
development
Brief (medium+ tasks), Spec, Implementation plan