skills/research/paper-review/latte-review-guide/SKILL.md
Automate systematic literature reviews with LatteReview AI agents
npx skillsauth add wentorai/research-plugins latte-review-guideInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
LatteReview is a low-code Python package that uses AI agents to automate systematic literature reviews. It handles title/abstract screening, full-text assessment, data extraction, and PRISMA-compliant reporting — tasks that typically consume hundreds of researcher-hours. Supports multiple LLM backends (Anthropic, OpenAI, local models).
pip install lattereview
from lattereview import ReviewProject
# Create a new review project
project = ReviewProject(
name="ML in Medical Imaging Review",
research_question="What deep learning architectures are used for "
"medical image segmentation?",
inclusion_criteria=[
"Uses deep learning for medical image segmentation",
"Published in peer-reviewed venue",
"Reports quantitative evaluation metrics",
],
exclusion_criteria=[
"Review/survey articles",
"Non-English publications",
"Conference abstracts only",
],
)
# Import from various sources
project.import_papers("scopus_export.csv", source="scopus")
project.import_papers("pubmed_export.csv", source="pubmed")
# Or from a DataFrame
import pandas as pd
df = pd.read_csv("papers.csv")
project.import_from_dataframe(df,
title_col="title",
abstract_col="abstract",
year_col="year",
)
print(f"Imported {project.total_papers} papers")
from lattereview.agents import ScreeningAgent
# Configure screening agent
screener = ScreeningAgent(
llm_provider="anthropic",
model="claude-sonnet-4-20250514",
criteria=project.inclusion_criteria,
exclusion=project.exclusion_criteria,
)
# Title/abstract screening
results = screener.screen(
project.papers,
mode="title_abstract",
confidence_threshold=0.7,
)
# Results include: decision, confidence, reasoning
for paper in results[:3]:
print(f"{paper.title}")
print(f" Decision: {paper.decision} "
f"(confidence: {paper.confidence:.2f})")
print(f" Reason: {paper.reasoning}")
from lattereview.agents import ExtractionAgent
extractor = ExtractionAgent(
llm_provider="anthropic",
fields={
"architecture": "Deep learning architecture used",
"dataset": "Medical imaging dataset",
"modality": "Imaging modality (CT, MRI, X-ray, etc.)",
"dice_score": "Best Dice similarity coefficient reported",
"sample_size": "Number of images/patients",
},
)
extracted = extractor.extract(project.included_papers)
# Export structured data
extracted.to_csv("extracted_data.csv")
# PRISMA flow diagram
project.generate_prisma_diagram("prisma.png")
# Summary statistics
summary = project.summarize()
print(f"Screened: {summary['screened']}")
print(f"Included: {summary['included']}")
print(f"Excluded: {summary['excluded']}")
# Use different LLM providers
screener = ScreeningAgent(
llm_provider="openai",
model="gpt-4o",
)
# Local models via Ollama
screener = ScreeningAgent(
llm_provider="ollama",
model="llama3",
base_url="http://localhost:11434",
)
# Simulate dual-reviewer screening for reliability
results = screener.dual_screen(
project.papers,
models=["claude-sonnet-4-20250514", "gpt-4o"],
agreement_threshold=0.8,
)
# Papers with disagreement flagged for human review
conflicts = [p for p in results if p.agreement < 0.8]
print(f"{len(conflicts)} papers need human adjudication")
documentation
Write Tsinghua University theses using the ThuThesis LaTeX template
development
Templates, formatting rules, and strategies for thesis and dissertation writing
documentation
Set up LaTeX templates for PhD and Master's thesis documents
documentation
Write SJTU theses using the SJTUThesis LaTeX template with full compliance