skills/system-profile/SKILL.md
Profile a target (script, process, GPU, memory, interconnect) for performance analysis. Use when user says "profile", "benchmark", "bottleneck", or wants performance analysis.
npx skillsauth add wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep system-profileInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Profile the specified target and summarize the results. Target: $ARGUMENTS
You are a profiling assistant. Based on the user's target, choose appropriate profiling strategies, including writing instrumentation code when needed, then run profiling, analyze results, and produce a summary.
Parse $ARGUMENTS to understand what to profile. Examples:
If $ARGUMENTS is empty or unclear, ask the user.
Select from external tools and/or code instrumentation as appropriate. Don't limit yourself to the examples below — use whatever makes sense for the target.
External tools (check availability first):
cProfile, py-spy, line_profiler, perf stat, /usr/bin/time -vtracemalloc, memory_profiler, memraynvidia-smi, nvidia-smi dmon, nvitop, torch.profiler, nsysnvidia-smi topo -m, nvidia-smi nvlink, NCCL_DEBUG=INFOstrace -c, iostat, vmstatCode instrumentation — when external tools are insufficient, write and insert profiling code into the target. Typical scenarios:
Design the instrumentation based on what you observe in the code — don't use a fixed template.
Depending on the target, focus on some or all of these:
CPU overhead
Memory overhead
Interconnect & communication
GPU compute
When inserting code into the target:
# [PROFILE] comments)./profile_output/Part A — Profiling results (structured tables by dimension, as applicable):
Part B — Instrumentation changelog (MANDATORY): List every file that was modified or created for profiling purposes:
| File | Change type | What was added/modified | Line(s) | |------|-------------|------------------------|---------| | ... | modified | ... | ... | | ... | created | ... | — |
This allows the user to review and revert all instrumentation changes. Offer to clean up (remove all instrumentation) when the user is done.
development
Search GitHub Issues and Discussions for software errors, version compatibility problems, and exact error-string matches. Use for debugging and discovery only; results are not paper-citation evidence.
development
Search GitHub Issues and Discussions for software errors, version compatibility problems, and exact error-string matches. Use for debugging and discovery only; results are not paper-citation evidence.
testing
Run the Anti-Autoresearch integrity-forensics sweep (span-anchored evidence ledger → GPT auditors propose findings → deterministic rules-only adjudicator) against a paper via a SHA-pinned thin launcher — then convert the verdict into a typed policy gate (BLOCK/WARN/NO_NEW_BLOCKER) and an append-only obligations ledger. Use when user says "integrity forensics", "forensic audit this paper", "投稿前自查诚信", "审这篇论文的诚信", or says "anti-autoresearch" when the upstream repo's own skills are not installed. Also invoked by /paper-writing (submission self-forensics, default ON), /peer-review (forensic appendix), /resubmit-pipeline.
testing
Privileged applier that LANDS meta-optimize / corpus-audit patches the user approved — the ONLY skill permitted to mutate the skill corpus from a self-modification proposal, with cross-model jury and human approval at landing. Use when the user says "meta apply", "/meta-apply", "land the staged patches", "应用优化", after a /meta-optimize run.