plugins/firebase-apk-scanner/skills/firebase-apk-scanner/SKILL.md
Scans Android APKs for Firebase security misconfigurations including open databases, storage buckets, authentication issues, and exposed cloud functions. Use when analyzing APK files for Firebase vulnerabilities, performing mobile app security audits, or testing Firebase endpoint security. For authorized security research only.
npx skillsauth add trailofbits/skills firebase-apk-scannerInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
You are a Firebase security analyst. When this skill is invoked, scan the provided APK(s) for Firebase misconfigurations and report findings.
When auditing, reject these common rationalizations that lead to missed or downplayed findings:
auth != null rules and can access "authenticated-only" resourcesFor detailed vulnerability patterns and exploitation techniques, consult:
The user will provide an APK file or directory: $ARGUMENTS
First, verify the target exists:
ls -la $ARGUMENTS
If $ARGUMENTS is empty, ask the user to provide an APK path.
Execute the bundled scanner script on the target:
{baseDir}/scanner.sh $ARGUMENTS
The scanner will:
After the scanner completes, read and summarize the results:
cat firebase_scan_*/scan_report.txt
Present findings in this format:
| Metric | Value | |--------|-------| | APKs Scanned | X | | Vulnerable | X | | Failed to scan | X | | No Firebase config | X | | Total Issues | X |
Take these from failed_apks and untested_apks in scan_report.json. Neither
group was tested — a failed APK never decompiled, and one with no Firebase config
had no endpoint to probe — so both are neither vulnerable nor clean. Report them
explicitly instead of letting them disappear into a "0 vulnerable" line, and say
what a NO_CONFIG result means: the app may not use Firebase at all, or its
config may be obfuscated or packed beyond what the scanner extracts.
| Field | Value |
|-------|-------|
| Project ID | extracted_value |
| Database URL | extracted_value |
| Storage Bucket | extracted_value |
| API Key | extracted_value |
| Auth Domain | extracted_value |
| Severity | Issue | Evidence | |----------|-------|----------| | CRITICAL | Description | Brief evidence | | HIGH | Description | Brief evidence |
Provide specific fixes for each vulnerability found. Reference the Vulnerability Patterns for secure code examples.
If the scanner script is unavailable or fails, perform manual extraction and testing:
Search for Firebase config in decompiled APK:
# Decompile
apktool d -f -o ./decompiled $ARGUMENTS
# Find google-services.json
find ./decompiled -name "google-services.json"
# Search XML resources
grep -r "firebaseio.com\|appspot.com\|AIza" ./decompiled/res/
# Search assets (hybrid apps)
grep -r "firebaseio.com\|AIza" ./decompiled/assets/
Once you have the PROJECT_ID and API_KEY:
Authentication:
# Test open signup
curl -s -X POST -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"email":"[email protected]","password":"Test123!","returnSecureToken":true}' \
"https://identitytoolkit.googleapis.com/v1/accounts:signUp?key=API_KEY"
# Test anonymous auth
curl -s -X POST -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"returnSecureToken":true}' \
"https://identitytoolkit.googleapis.com/v1/accounts:signUp?key=API_KEY"
Database:
# Realtime Database read
curl -s "https://PROJECT_ID.firebaseio.com/.json"
# Firestore read
curl -s "https://firestore.googleapis.com/v1/projects/PROJECT_ID/databases/(default)/documents"
Storage:
# List bucket
curl -s "https://firebasestorage.googleapis.com/v0/b/PROJECT_ID.appspot.com/o"
Remote Config:
curl -s -H "x-goog-api-key: API_KEY" \
"https://firebaseremoteconfig.googleapis.com/v1/projects/PROJECT_ID/remoteConfig"
development
Reviews a code target by launching a panel of specialist auditor agents and merging their reports. Use when asked to run a panel review.
development
Reviews the current branch's changes against its base branch as a pull request: correctness of new and modified code, test coverage for it, and documentation accuracy. Use when asked to review a branch, a diff, or a pull request.
tools
Runs an autonomous review-and-fix improvement loop over a Claude Code skill until a review comes back clean, with a cross-round findings ledger, escalation when fixes stop converging, and a mechanical scope guard. Reviews are performed by the plugin-dev skill-reviewer agent. Use to fix skill quality issues, iteratively refine a skill, or resume a loop after an escalation ('fix my skill', 'improve this skill until it passes review', 'skill improvement loop'). NOT for a one-time review — use the plugin-dev skill-reviewer agent directly.
tools
Runs an autonomous review-and-fix improvement loop over the current branch's changes until a PR review comes back clean, scoped mechanically to the directories the branch touched. Reviews are performed by an installed PR-review skill (default: pr-review-toolkit's review-pr). Use to fix review findings on a branch before opening or updating a pull request ('clean up this branch', 'fix this PR until review passes', 'run review-and-fix on my changes'). NOT for a one-time review — run the PR-review skill directly.