plugins/trailmark/skills/diagramming-code/SKILL.md
Generates Mermaid diagrams from Trailmark code graphs. Produces call graphs, class hierarchies, module dependency maps, containment diagrams, complexity heatmaps, and attack surface data flow visualizations. Use when visualizing code architecture, drawing call graphs, generating class diagrams, creating dependency maps, producing complexity heatmaps, or visualizing data flow and attack surface paths as Mermaid diagrams.
npx skillsauth add trailofbits/skills diagramming-codeInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Generates Mermaid diagrams from Trailmark's code graph. A pre-made script
handles Mermaid syntax generation; Claude selects the diagram type and
parameters. Trailmark 0.4.0 includes a native trailmark diagram command; use
it only after a version/command check, otherwise use this skill's bundled
script.
trailmark skill)genotoxic skill)trailmark must be installed. If uv run trailmark fails, run:
uv tool install trailmark
# Python snippets: uv run --with trailmark python - (a tool env is not importable)
DO NOT fall back to hand-writing Mermaid from source code reading. The script uses Trailmark's parsed graph for accuracy. If installation fails, report the error to the user.
Check whether native v0.4 diagram support exists:
trailmark diagram --help 2>/dev/null || uv run trailmark diagram --help 2>/dev/null
If this succeeds, you may use trailmark diagram. If it fails, use
uv run {baseDir}/scripts/diagram.py, which keeps the older skill workflow
intact. Do not assume the native CLI exists on Trailmark 0.2.x.
uv run {baseDir}/scripts/diagram.py \
--target {targetDir} --language auto --type call-graph \
--focus main --depth 2
# Trailmark 0.4.0+ equivalent after the Version Gate succeeds
uv run trailmark diagram \
--target {targetDir} --language auto --type call-graph \
--focus main --depth 2
Output is raw Mermaid text. Wrap in a fenced code block:
```mermaid
flowchart TB
...
```
├─ "Who calls what?" → --type call-graph
├─ "Class inheritance?" → --type class-hierarchy
├─ "Module dependencies?" → --type module-deps
├─ "Class members and structure?" → --type containment
├─ "Where is complexity highest?" → --type complexity
└─ "Path from input to function?" → --type data-flow
For detailed examples of each type, see references/diagram-types.md.
Diagram Progress:
- [ ] Step 1: Verify trailmark is installed
- [ ] Step 2: Identify diagram type from user request
- [ ] Step 3: Determine focus node and parameters
- [ ] Step 4: Run diagram.py script (or native trailmark diagram on v0.4+)
- [ ] Step 5: Verify output is non-empty and well-formed
- [ ] Step 6: Embed diagram in response
Step 1: Run uv run trailmark analyze --language auto --summary {targetDir}. Install
if it fails. Then run pre-analysis via the programmatic API:
from trailmark.query.api import QueryEngine
engine = QueryEngine.from_directory("{targetDir}", language="auto")
engine.preanalysis()
Pre-analysis enriches the graph with blast radius, taint propagation,
and privilege boundary data used by data-flow diagrams.
If auto-detection is wrong for the target, rerun with an explicit language or
comma-separated list such as python,rust.
Step 2: Match the user's request to a --type using the decision tree
above.
Step 3: For call-graph and data-flow, identify the focus function.
Default --depth 2. Use --direction LR for dependency flows.
Step 4: Run the script and capture stdout. If the native v0.4 CLI is available, either command is acceptable; prefer the bundled script when you need behavior consistent with this skill's references.
Step 5: Check: output starts with flowchart or classDiagram,
contains at least one node. If empty or malformed, consult
references/mermaid-syntax.md.
Step 6: Wrap output in ```mermaid ``` code fence.
uv run {baseDir}/scripts/diagram.py [OPTIONS]
# or, on Trailmark 0.4.0+:
uv run trailmark diagram [OPTIONS]
| Argument | Short | Default | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| --target | -t | required | Directory to analyze |
| --language | -l | python | Source language |
| --type | -T | required | Diagram type (see above) |
| --focus | -f | none | Center diagram on this node |
| --depth | -d | 2 | BFS traversal depth |
| --direction | | TB | Layout: TB (top-bottom) or LR (left-right) |
| --threshold | | 10 | Min complexity for complexity type |
# Call graph centered on a function
uv run {baseDir}/scripts/diagram.py -t src/ -T call-graph -f parse_file
# Class hierarchy for a Rust project
uv run {baseDir}/scripts/diagram.py -t src/ -l rust -T class-hierarchy
# Module dependency map, left-to-right
uv run {baseDir}/scripts/diagram.py -t src/ -T module-deps --direction LR
# Class members
uv run {baseDir}/scripts/diagram.py -t src/ -T containment
# Complexity heatmap (threshold 5)
uv run {baseDir}/scripts/diagram.py -t src/ -T complexity --threshold 5
# Data flow from entrypoints to a specific function
uv run {baseDir}/scripts/diagram.py -t src/ -T data-flow -f execute_query
Direction: Use TB (default) for hierarchical views, LR for
left-to-right flows like dependency chains.
Depth: Increase --depth to see more of the call graph. Decrease to
reduce clutter. The script warns if the diagram exceeds 100 nodes.
Focus: Always use --focus for call-graph on non-trivial codebases.
For data-flow, omitting focus auto-targets the top 10 complexity hotspots.
Language: Prefer --language auto for polyglot or unfamiliar repos.
Use an explicit language only when you know the target is single-language or
you need to exclude unrelated components.
development
Reviews a code target by launching a panel of specialist auditor agents and merging their reports. Use when asked to run a panel review.
development
Reviews the current branch's changes against its base branch as a pull request: correctness of new and modified code, test coverage for it, and documentation accuracy. Use when asked to review a branch, a diff, or a pull request.
tools
Runs an autonomous review-and-fix improvement loop over a Claude Code skill until a review comes back clean, with a cross-round findings ledger, escalation when fixes stop converging, and a mechanical scope guard. Reviews are performed by the plugin-dev skill-reviewer agent. Use to fix skill quality issues, iteratively refine a skill, or resume a loop after an escalation ('fix my skill', 'improve this skill until it passes review', 'skill improvement loop'). NOT for a one-time review — use the plugin-dev skill-reviewer agent directly.
tools
Runs an autonomous review-and-fix improvement loop over the current branch's changes until a PR review comes back clean, scoped mechanically to the directories the branch touched. Reviews are performed by an installed PR-review skill (default: pr-review-toolkit's review-pr). Use to fix review findings on a branch before opening or updating a pull request ('clean up this branch', 'fix this PR until review passes', 'run review-and-fix on my changes'). NOT for a one-time review — run the PR-review skill directly.