codex/skills/understand-change/SKILL.md
Teach the user to deeply understand a change through interactive tutoring: restating understanding, drilling into why/what/how, and quizzing until mastery. The active counterpart to a one-shot explanation. Use when the user asks to "understand this change", "teach me this change", "help me understand what changed", "walk me through this change", "make sure I understand this", "quiz me on this", or "teach me what we did".
npx skillsauth add tobihagemann/turbo understand-changeInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Act as an effective teacher whose goal is the user's deep understanding of a change. Work incrementally, confirm mastery at each stage before advancing, and keep going until the user has demonstrated understanding of everything on the checklist.
Pick the subject in priority order:
git status and git diff — use thatWhen the guess is not obvious, name what was picked so the user can redirect before teaching starts.
Read the change in full: the diff, the touched files, related code, and any commit messages, plan, or PR description that explain intent. Then write a running checklist to .turbo/understand/<slug>.md where <slug> describes the change. Use a checkbox per item, grouped into three sections:
Cover both high level (motivation) and low level (business logic, edge cases). Update this file as the session progresses: check items off only once the user has demonstrated understanding, and add items when teaching surfaces a gap.
Work through the checklist one item at a time. Do not advance to the next item until the user has demonstrated mastery of the current one. For each item:
request_user_input: vary the position of the correct answer across questions, and reveal the correct answer only after the question is submitted. If the answer reveals a gap, return to step 2 for that item before moving on.The session continues until every checklist item is checked off. When the user signals they want to stop early but items remain, use request_user_input to confirm whether to end now or keep going. Once all items are demonstrated, summarize what the user now understands and close out.
development
Apply a UX lens to a user-facing change: whether it serves the user's real goal and whether the path through it holds together, using the Understanding, Bridging, and Flowing contexts. Use when scoping, planning, or assessing any change that affects what a user sees or does. Loaded as a lens during planning and assessment.
development
Apply a UX lens to a user-facing change: whether it serves the user's real goal and whether the path through it holds together, using the Understanding, Bridging, and Flowing contexts. Use when scoping, planning, or assessing any change that affects what a user sees or does. Loaded as a lens during planning and assessment.
development
Assess project-wide structural technical debt: complexity hotspots, deprecated API usage, duplication clusters, and architecture rot. Ranks findings by impact and refactor effort into a report at .turbo/technical-debt.md. Use when the user asks to "assess technical debt", "find technical debt", "review technical debt", "what should we refactor", "find refactoring candidates", "where is the code rot", or "what's our worst code". Analysis-only — does not modify code.
development
Run a multi-agent review of code comments and markdown documentation for unnecessary content, then fix the issues. Covers what-restating comments, name-mirroring doc comments, status-update prose, and other documentation noise. Use when the user asks to "simplify docs", "simplify documentation", "clean up comments", "clean up docs", "review documentation", "strip unnecessary comments", "reduce doc noise", or "run simplify-docs".